Linked by Andrew Youll on Sun 24th Jul 2005 21:01 UTC, submitted by Falko Timme
Internet & Networking This is a very detailed tutorial about how to use Fedora Core 4 to set up a server, with numerous screenshots to aid you along the way.
Order by: Score:
Why?
by Buck on Sun 24th Jul 2005 22:01 UTC
Buck
Member since:
2005-06-29

Why would you want to set up a server with a Fedora Core, other than for experimentation and education purposes?

Reply Score: 1

RE: Why?
by the_trapper on Sun 24th Jul 2005 22:19 UTC in reply to "Why?"
the_trapper Member since:
2005-07-07

I'd have to agree, Fedora Core is not really your best choice in the server space. The only reason you might want to use it on a server is for applications that require cutting-edge functionality not yet available elsewhere.

A better choice for those needing a RedHat-ish Linux server would be RedHat Enterprise Linux or one of its many free derivatives such as CentOS http://www.centos.org/

Reply Score: 1

RE[2]: Why?
by Anonymous on Mon 25th Jul 2005 08:32 UTC in reply to "RE: Why?"
Anonymous Member since:
---

SourceForge and Wikipedia currently use Fedora as server FYI.
I agree that Fedora Core is not a good choice in a large enterprise environment though.

Reply Score: 0

why use fc
by Anonymous on Sun 24th Jul 2005 22:05 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

anybody upgrade server 3 times every year?

Reply Score: 0

RE: why use fc
by orestes on Sun 24th Jul 2005 23:55 UTC in reply to "why use fc"
orestes Member since:
2005-07-06

Fedora releases twice a year, and no one is holding a gun to your head forcing you to upgrade.

Reply Score: 1

RE: why use fc
by Anonymous on Mon 25th Jul 2005 08:28 UTC in reply to "why use fc"
Anonymous Member since:
---

Not true, FC5 is scheduled for 9 months i.e. February 2006 because of major incoming change like Ananconda.

Reply Score: 0

Not exactly the 'perfect setup' !
by rklrkl on Sun 24th Jul 2005 22:35 UTC
rklrkl
Member since:
2005-07-06

I was bemused to see that the author only created /, /boot and swap partitions - I think this isn't too clever for a server setup myself. I usually create a "/otheros" partition which is set to the same size as "/" (which I'm now setting to 6GB for servers to make sure there's at least 2GB free after OS installation) - this allows me to cold install a later OS should I want to upgrade at a later date and still have an immediate fallback to the original OS (I never "warm upgrade" a production server straight into its current "/" partition - too risky, IMHO).

Whatever space is left (usually the vast majority if you've got a reasonably large RAID setup), I call "/data", so that I can store non-system files away from "/" (or, where necessary, soft-link across from / to /data for some trees).

BTW, I think Fedora Core 4 is a little bit too "new" to employ on a production server yet - I'd put it on a test server and let it stew for a bit (especially to pick up the inevitably bug fixes that come in the first few months of its life). It's why I'm running Fedora Core 2 still on a lot of my boxes (despite the whinges from people out there, it's pretty stable and I think good enough for production services, as is probably FC3 - which, let's not forget, is what RHEL 4 is based on).

Reply Score: 2

Odd
by Anonymous on Mon 25th Jul 2005 02:00 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

Server...screenshots...anaconda

There must be a mechanism for unassisted deployment.

Reply Score: 0

RE: Odd
by shotsman on Mon 25th Jul 2005 08:20 UTC in reply to "Odd"
shotsman Member since:
2005-07-22

If I am correct in understanding your requirement, there is a method for installing "unassisted" it is called kickstart and has been a feature of RedHat Linux/RHEL/Fedora for years.
I Use it all the time. Do a sample install with the GUI, tick the relevant box to generate your kickstart file. At the end, save to floppy/cd/medium of choice and you can use it over and over again.
One of my top criteria for building a production system is all about repeatability. By using a ks file then you are sure that you can build the same underlying core system time and time again quickly and easily.
I use Fedora for servers. Yes they are not in a production environment but the "bleeding edge" nature of the distro is just what I want so that I can get a taste of what is to come in RHEL etc and can make my code ready for future versions of RHEL.
I also like the improved HW coverage OOTB in Fedora.

Reply Score: 1

Why?
by rm6990 on Mon 25th Jul 2005 02:36 UTC
rm6990
Member since:
2005-07-04

Why would you use Fedora Core on a server, why not use CentOS? They are essentially the same, but CentOS has a longer life than Fedora releases.

Reply Score: 1

Fedora Core 4 is not a good choice
by pravda on Mon 25th Jul 2005 03:13 UTC
pravda
Member since:
2005-07-06

No software is certified to run on Fedora Core 4. It simply does not make sense to use the bleeding edge version of Red Hat on a server.

Unless you are just playing around. Then it doesn't really matter. And you can put a GUI on the server...

Reply Score: 1

Fedore Core 4 is a fine choice
by Matzon on Mon 25th Jul 2005 06:06 UTC
Matzon
Member since:
2005-07-06

meh, my server is Fedora Core 4, having been network updated from Fedora Core 2 - works like a charm.

Since it's for personal use, I don't care all that much about uptime, but I have yet to see it crash, it's been running perfect.

As for a more advanced server, you wouldn't use this guide anyway. Which is what botheres me - it comes off as a n00b guide, yet it does a LOT of stuff that are irrelevant for newbies.

Reply Score: 1

v LOL
by Anonymous on Mon 25th Jul 2005 07:22 UTC
good guide
by Anonymous on Mon 25th Jul 2005 11:04 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

For me as a home user, this is a perfect description on how to get my own server up an running, it nice with a complete guide from start to finish.

/Anders Keis Hansen

Reply Score: 0