Windows uses a file system called NTFS, today's Linux distributions primarily use ext3, and like two warring tribes, the two barely speak. Fortunately, there's a handy tool from Paragon Software Group called NTFS for Linux, which acts like an interpreter for these battling nations. For Linux users hampered by lack of communication with Windows, Paragon's NTFS for Linux presents an elegant and effective solution.
Post a Comment
Member since:
---
The author claims that a valid security concern is that you could boot off a Linux CD and get full readwrite access to the NTFS partition. The only flaw in this reasoning is that you can do exactly the same thing with Windows. You can build a functional Windows XP system into a bootable CD, which allows you the same priviledges.
Member since:2005-07-06
Member since:---
Member since:---
Member since:
---
Member since:---
Member since:2005-07-06
Member since:---
Member since:---
Member since:2005-07-06
*Sigh* not this again! Windows vista will continue to use NTFS. Winfs is a file storage subsystem that will run ontop of NTFS. see here for more details http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winfs
Member since:---
I prefer using captive-ntfs which uses WXP original driver to read/write ntfs filesystems without any limitations and of course is FREE, why I would be using linux (Open source) to waste 150$ in additional software to access privative file systems??
There are free alternatives that work fine
Member since:---
Member since:2005-07-06
Member since:
2005-06-29
Member since:2005-07-07
Member since:
2005-08-26
This open source project provides the same functionality: http://www.jankratochvil.net/project/captive/
Member since:---
and yet another one, used to work perfectly for me 1.5 years ago, it must be even more advanced now: http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/
Member since:
---
And here's yet another open source alternative to this software.
http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/
Member since:2005-07-06
No it isn't.
The only write support these free versions offer is:
Quote:
Still read-only, but with safe file overwrite support on all Windows versions without changes to the file size (uncompressed, unencrypted, nonsparse files only).
In other words, a write support which isn't a proper write support at all.
Other people in this topic talk about captive ntfs which uses wine to write to ntfs. Great but have you ever looked at the speed? Last time i tried my writing speed was 600 Kbyte/sec and reading speed 3 Mbyte a sec.
This "should" be the first product that offers fast read and write support for ntfs probably as fast as you could read/write to an ext3 partition. That's why i'm really interested in seeing some benchmarks.
A last thing: captive ntfs development has stopped.
Member since:---
Actually, Paragon's NTFS for Linux is anything but new. Here's a review from PCMag from almost a year ago: http://www.linux-magazine.com/issue/49/Mounting_NTFS_Partitions.pdf
Notice the reading speed. Although it couldn't be compared to Captive's speed (have they tested only a single file which happened to fail?), transfer rate is slow. Slower than on new mp3 players. Writing ain't a big thing either.
Notice that on Paragons website, new updates have bugfixes only, nothing related to speed.
Don't blame Paragon though, I guess nothing more can be done since you need to use reverse engineering just try to gasp an idea on how NTFS works.
If you seriously need dual booting, the best you can do is to have Windows on one or several FAT32 partitions. Use the reading support the linux kernel has to read from NTFS partitions. If you need to write, go with Captive, and use it only when necessary.
Attempting to go beyond that is just trying to use NTFS for something it isn't meant to do: be used on Linux. Really, it wasn't designed to be dual booted on other OSes, so it is a great that open-source support got this far.
Member since:
2005-07-06
Member since:---
Member since:---
Member since:
---
Member since:2005-07-06
Member since:
---
Using Captive NTFS is illegal as long as you don't have a licence of Microsoft Windows.
The NTFS support in the Linux kernel is read-only, not read/write. It can safely overwrite files, but that's it. It cannot create files or directories.
So if you need a real NTFS driver for Linux and you don't need Windows (or don't want to support Microsoft for whatever reason), the Paragon tool is the cheapest (or only) solution, even for $70. No, it doesn't cost $150.
Member since:---
Member since:2005-07-07
i HAD a copy of windows, in a PC with a second HDD.
When I sold the PC (Including Windows licence), I kept the HDD.
Now I need to read from it and alter the files on it.
I had a PC with an external data drive (NTFS). Now that I no longer have the Windows licence, I still want to use the external drive, and it has data on it.
I use a second HDD which I would like to be read/writable from my friend's Windows PC as well as my Linuc PC. AS his PC will not read/write to ext3, I use NTFS.
More needed?
Member since:---
If you kept a HDD and you did no use windows, you can use NTFS kernel module to read data, then format it and restore the info.
If you want to share a HDD with your friends (you using linux, you friends using windows) do what everybody does, use FAT32 filesystem in the HDD to share.
Yes!! more needed
Member since:---
> If you want to share a HDD with your friends (you using
> linux, you friends using windows) do what everybody
> does, use FAT32 filesystem in the HDD to share.
FAT32 has serious flaws. Yes, I already had a case where NTFS was the only possibility to store my data because FAT32 couldn't handle large amounts of small files properly.
Why shouldn't I use NTFS? Correct answer: The only reason is that Linux can't write on it.
- Morin
Member since:2005-07-06
Member since:---
Member since:
2005-06-29
I had already heard about this s/w, and that it can have full access, but read in a review some time ago that it did have some problems (with lots of files if I remember), and that speed wasn't all that great too.
I was hoping that this 'review' had some benchmarks and at least some level of testing beyond 'works for me', but it seems that it's only repeating the stuff you can probably find at paragon's website...
Member since:
---
Member since:
---
Member since:2005-06-29
Member since:
---
Member since:2005-07-07
"I" don't have Windows installed, but I do have several older HDD with back-up data on, in FAT32 and NTFS.
My friend keeps trashing his PC and is willing to bring it over to me and pay me to fix it. Booting to a Linux environment to run diagnostics/anti-virus/etc is handy. NTFS support needed.
Anyone else think that THEY don't need NTFS support? Are you ALL going to tell the rest of us what WE need?
It would be nice if all OSSs talked to all file systems. But they don't. Some of us find it useful to have the facility to read a non-native fs.
Member since:---
Member since:
---
Member since:2005-07-08
Paragon sell other products based on the same technology ("Paragon NTFS for Windows 98" for example), so it falls into the same category as the nVidia drivers I think.
(See http://kerneltrap.org/node/1735 for Linus' stance on the matter.)
Member since:
---
Member since:
---
1. Captive driver is slow, requires access to a Windows binary file, doesn't work on non x86 machines.
2. Free NTFS driver for Linux doesn't have stable, complete write support.
3. There are plenty of reasons why a Linux machine might need to access an NTFS drive.
I also don't get why people think software fine-print and law are the same thing, and that using a file against Microsoft's wishes is "illegal". Who makes the laws in your country anyway?
Member since:2005-07-24
I also don't get why people think software fine-print and law are the same thing, and that using a file against Microsoft's wishes is "illegal". Who makes the laws in your country anyway?
I'm assuming you're talking about the files distributed with Windows. Those files are Microsoft's Intellectual Property (whether you like it or not), which means they're protected by IP laws.
These laws do say you can't do anything with those files unless you have permission to do so. When you buy Windows, MS gives you permission to use those files, but under their conditions. That's called a license.
Now you're bound to those conditions, and yes, that's also protected by law.
Member since:2005-07-06
Member since:---
Member since:2005-08-18
"These laws do say you can't do anything with those files unless you have permission to do so. When you buy Windows, MS gives you permission to use those files, but under their conditions. That's called a license."
As much as MS, and other companies, laywers wants you to think so that's not the case.
An EULA is not a legally binding document and even if it was it cant pre-empt the fundamental rights you have as a citizen. You can use the files that comes with windows in any way you want to do whatever you want. You can even modify them.
What you can NOT do is redistribute the original files (or your modified ones) without consent from the copyright holder, in this case Microsoft.
Perhaps the DMCA changes this somewhat but the DMCA has no legal validity outside U.S borders and is therefore of no relevance to most people.
Member since:---
I don't get it as well.
Captive driver is slow, requires access to a Windows binary file, doesn't work on non x86 machines.
I only understand the argument that it's slow. But I don't get why the other two points you make are a problem. I assume that if you need access to an NTFS partition you have an x86 machine and a copy of Windows anyway.
There are plenty of reasons why a Linux machine might need to access an NTFS drive.
That's the main point I don't get. Can you explain which computing scenario requires access to an NTFS partition if the Windows operating system isn't involved at all? Does NTFS provide you with anything that Linux' native file systems don't offer?
Member since:---
Member since:---
Member since:2005-07-06
Member since:---
If you _do_ use NTFS on something you want to share across multiple platforms, then you deserve all the trouble it'll give you.
How wise is it to use a proprietary fs to exchange information?
If the information is on an usb-device, you might as well use ext2 or ext3 - or perhaps fat32. Worrying about security in regard to fs on USB-stickers is like worrying about security in regard to fs on floppy disks... who gives a damn?
dylansmrjones
kristian AT herkild DOT dk
Member since:2005-07-11
Member since:
---
Member since:
---
Member since:
---
Does this paragon product allows you to clone ntfs partitions?Otherwise this link might be interesting,after all it's free:
http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/man/ntfsclone.html
Member since:
---
This sounds like a handy utility to have.
Valuable and worth the money for commercial use.
Now those of us who just run Linux at home would also find this useful but I think it costs too much, I mean we can live without writing to NTFS, it isnt hard to have a FAT32 partition for information interchange, so this is just a nice to have convenience - how about a non commercial download for a lot less?
Member since:
2005-07-06
Windows uses a file system called NTFS, today's Linux distributions primarily use ext3, and like two warring tribes, the two barely speak.<Br>
I know, it must have been a party friday, or just a slow saturday morning :] Anyway, first, distributions don't use any filesystem primarily, at most they give you half a dozen choices with one or another as default. That may be ext3, or not. As for Windows not supporting any linux file system natively, correct (only one or two third party drivers and apps exist, like limited ext2/ext3 read/write and a reiser driver with very limited features and fequent BSOD), as for Linux not supporting Windows file systems, not really correct (think fat,vfat with read/write and reading ntfs natively, without third party support).<Br>
That said, this Paragon stuff looks cool, but I wouldn't pay for such a thing, instead I'll remain with my usual fat32 buffer partitions for data transfer.
What I would pay for is a full-featured (with access rights, full read/write support, no BSOD) native xfs filesystem driver for Windows.
Member since:
---
Actually, I use Linux and xp. Sharing filesystems has always been a problem until now. Why not format all you're drives with ext3 on linux and mount theses (read/write) with windows ?
better check this tool : http://www.fs-driver.org/ it works admirably.
note : captive solution works but it's sooo slow...
Member since:
---
And this other Paragon's product ?
Mount Everything 3.0
http://www.mount-everything.com/
It costs "only" $39.95.
Does it permit linux access NTS partitions ?
Member since:
2005-07-08
I'll accept that there are some cases where open formats/protocols/standards are a bad idea, but right now I can only think of military situations. Filesystem formats should be open. All of the linux filesystems are: ext2, ext3, ReiserFS, JFS, XFS, Reiser4, etc. FAT16 and FAT32 are. But NTFS is not. And yet this article portrays ext3 (the predominant Linux filesystem, it adds) as one of two "warring parties" that don't talk to one another.
The EU ruling was about media and communications, because that's where the "money" is right now. But the umbrella of interoperability should cover local filesystems, too.
I think the name Captive-NTFS is fitting. Why does our society, our law, allow us to be cative to a proprietary format? Why do "English as the national language" bills get shot down year after year in the US House of Representatives, and yet we are willing to make NTFS our global proprietary filesystem?
Member since:
---
No more to say: http://www.fs-driver.org
Now you can share a hard disk with a windows-friend without problem... or even in your oun network with read/write support, no 4GB limitation and no risks!
There are not limitations...
Thanks "Elclaudio" for the info! 
