Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Sep 2005 16:29 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless As expected, Palm has announced the Treo 700w, a Windows Mobile powered smartphone with a square 240x240 resolution. Top brass from Palm, Microsoft (including Bill Gates) and Verizon Wireless gathered in San Fransisco this morning to launch the device. Palm noted that this project has been in the works for, "a couple of years" and that it was one of the worst kept secrets in the industry. In addition, here (.pdf) are some Windows Mobile UI design tips and tricks. Update: Here is the official press release.
Order by: Score:
Widows Mobile?
by AdamW on Mon 26th Sep 2005 17:11 UTC
AdamW
Member since:
2005-07-06

uh, heh.

on another topic, 240x240? What the heck is up with that?

Reply Score: 0

RE: Widows Mobile?
by Eugenia on Mon 26th Sep 2005 17:35 UTC in reply to "Widows Mobile?"
Eugenia Member since:
2005-06-28

Exactly. I am pissed about this too. Not so because the resolution is smaller than a regular PocketPC smartphone, but because by being so MANY PPC applications and especially games won't run on this Treo (the standard PPC resolution is 240x320 and all apps have been tested for that alone -- in the BEST case you will get scrollbars, in the WORST case the app will crash). Same goes for HP's new phones that do the same thing btw, they go down to 240x240 in order to get space for a keyboard instead of have the keyboard sliding out. ;)

Reply Score: 5

At last !!!
by Anonymous on Mon 26th Sep 2005 17:14 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

I hope to upgrade my Treo.

Reply Score: 0

hmm
by Anonymous on Mon 26th Sep 2005 17:42 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

240x240 is a bit low of a resolution to do anything useful and the "keyboard" is very tiny but the real concern that immediately becomes apparent is that Windows Mobile is a power hog in comparison to Symbian, Linux, Palm OS, etc. which explains why Palm doesn't want to comment on the battery life of this phone.

Reply Score: 0

RE: hmm
by Eugenia on Mon 26th Sep 2005 17:47 UTC in reply to "hmm"
Eugenia Member since:
2005-06-28

Anonymous, please don't talk without knowing the facts. Windows Mobile 5 in particular does not live in RAM anymore (it turns it off on standby), and usually WM5 PDAs and phones now have about 20% better battery life than PPC2003 even when compared on the SAME hardware/batteries. So while the square resolution IS a problem, I don't expect the battery life to be one. As for the keyboard being too small, well, you can't make it infinitely big when you have a size restrain, now can you?

Reply Score: 5

eugenia:
by AdamW on Mon 26th Sep 2005 17:49 UTC
AdamW
Member since:
2005-07-06

since you're reading this, can you fix the problem my post originally referred to? the text describes the phone as "Widows Mobile" powered...

Reply Score: 0

RE: eugenia:
by Eugenia on Mon 26th Sep 2005 18:15 UTC in reply to "eugenia:"
Eugenia Member since:
2005-06-28

This is correct. It is Windows Mobile 5 powered.

Reply Score: 5

RE[2]: eugenia:
by AdamW on Mon 26th Sep 2005 19:03 UTC in reply to "RE: eugenia:"
AdamW Member since:
2005-07-06

Yes. Wi_N_dows Mobile powered. Not Widows Mobile.

Reply Score: 0

v RE[3]: eugenia:
by Anonymous on Mon 26th Sep 2005 19:40 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: eugenia:"
Does the PocketPC
by Anonymous on Mon 26th Sep 2005 17:49 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

Have a reasonable API? After a 'significant emotional event' with a .pst file, I decline to install Outlook. Will there be some sort of Palm Desktop, or are is Palm really the pwned by Redmond?

Reply Score: 0

RE: Does the PocketPC
by Eugenia on Mon 26th Sep 2005 18:16 UTC in reply to "Does the PocketPC"
Eugenia Member since:
2005-06-28

There is C/C++, .NET C# and VB to choose from. The API is ok.

As for a Palm Desktop equivelant, PocketPCs don't need that because MS has desktop apps that can really sync to the PPC. So yeah, Outlook is needed. OExpress doesn't work and Thunderbird doesn't work either.

Reply Score: 5

RE[2]: Does the PocketPC
by smitty_one_each on Tue 27th Sep 2005 01:18 UTC in reply to "RE: Does the PocketPC"
smitty_one_each Member since:
2005-07-07

Well, if there is VB, that implies COM, which in turn means that Python can spare me the Guantanamo Bay/Outlook experience.

Reply Score: 1

RE[2]: Does the PocketPC
by kaiwai on Tue 27th Sep 2005 06:12 UTC in reply to "RE: Does the PocketPC"
kaiwai Member since:
2005-07-06

As for a Palm Desktop equivelant, PocketPCs don't need that because MS has desktop apps that can really sync to the PPC. So yeah, Outlook is needed. OExpress doesn't work and Thunderbird doesn't work either.

So basically us MacOS X users are given the royal screw job by Palm? so whats the alternative now for those of us who aren't part of the 'status quo'?

Reply Score: 1

RE[3]: Does the PocketPC
by CPUGuy on Tue 27th Sep 2005 12:35 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Does the PocketPC"
CPUGuy Member since:
2005-07-06

A PalmOS based device, which Palm still makes, and will continue to make.

Reply Score: 1

RE[3]: Does the PocketPC
by Anonymous on Tue 27th Sep 2005 17:53 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Does the PocketPC"
Anonymous Member since:
---

A P910i, working perfectly with OsX

Reply Score: 0

Bummer
by Anonymous on Mon 26th Sep 2005 18:30 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

Hmmm I seriously considered a Treo - bummer, seems like a perfect time to take my business to Symbian.

Reply Score: 1

No thanks
by Anonymous on Mon 26th Sep 2005 18:37 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

I will stick to my Treo650 with Palm OS thanks. And with it, my nice 320x320 display.

Reply Score: 1

Palm Is Dead, Long Live Palm
by CharAznable on Mon 26th Sep 2005 18:37 UTC
CharAznable
Member since:
2005-07-06

Microsoft will have to pry my Treo 650 from my cold, dead fingers!!!

Reply Score: 1

Death knell for PalmOS?
by Anonymous on Mon 26th Sep 2005 18:49 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

Since industry pundits have been making funeral plans for traditional PDAs for more than a year, and since smart phones have been destined to take their place, and since Palm just announced its newest smart phone is running that awful Windows Mobile, then how much longer will Palm be putting money into PalmOS? This is indeed a sad day.

And before you ask what's so awful about it, it's from Microsoft, that's what. They truly are trying to take over, and the world industry is just rolling over and exposing its soft white underbelly to the overlords from Redmond. It's sickening.

Maybe this will open a hole for Linux/Qtopia powered smart phones. Can't hurt to dream.

Reply Score: 0

RE: Death knell for PalmOS?
by CPUGuy on Mon 26th Sep 2005 22:52 UTC in reply to "Death knell for PalmOS?"
CPUGuy Member since:
2005-07-06

Well, perhaps Palm found that Windows Mobile works better.

Also, Palm does not develop PalmOS, PalmSource does, which is a completely separate company. So, in essance, Palm is just a hardware company offering an alternative.

Reply Score: 1

idea suggestion for palm
by mini-me on Mon 26th Sep 2005 20:10 UTC
mini-me
Member since:
2005-07-06

Preload this puppy with WM5 as you have done now
On CD ROM provide flash files for WM5, Palm5 and Linux (palm6 - whatever). Let the user choose his OS - since the hardware specs between a Palm based and a Windows based device won't be different ;)

Now get hard to work on making a GSM/UMTS device ;)

Reply Score: 1

I only want to know...
by Anonymous on Mon 26th Sep 2005 21:50 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

... if it BSOD.
/me so happy with my Treo 650 ;)

Reply Score: 0

luck I guess
by Anonymous on Mon 26th Sep 2005 23:02 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

I have been lucky with my 650...only about 5 crashes in 9 months. Not bad. Works as advertised, and I use a lot software and games. The only complains i hear, is that people get some echo when I speak. Mail works fine. Will try to use another year and a half.

Reply Score: 0

I hate PPC
by Anonymous on Mon 26th Sep 2005 23:06 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

I was forced to go to PPC about 3 months ago by my employer. Since then I have lost all data 4 times. In fact, about 30 min after hearing about this deal between palm and Microsoft, my PPC when blank, reset, and lost all data.

Reply Score: 0

RE: I hate PPC
by CPUGuy on Tue 27th Sep 2005 03:06 UTC in reply to "I hate PPC"
CPUGuy Member since:
2005-07-06

Sounds more like faulty hardware than software.

Reply Score: 1

RE[2]: I hate PPC
by Calroth on Wed 28th Sep 2005 06:34 UTC in reply to "I hate PPC"
Calroth Member since:
2005-07-07

I was forced to go to PPC about 3 months ago by my employer. Since then I have lost all data 4 times.

I wonder how many more crashes it will take before you will figure out how to make backups.

No crash is acceptable. But seriously. There are backup programs, you can restore your handheld in 10 minutes. Your hands are not tied. Make backups.

Reply Score: 1

hrm..
by helf on Mon 26th Sep 2005 23:33 UTC
helf
Member since:
2005-07-06

I was all upset over this as well.. But it would be nice to be able to run a ssh session, irc/aim/what not AND be able to do web searches all at once. I probably wont upgrade from my treo 600 for a long while.. Still sucks that they are going the windows route.

I really wish their was a properly multitasking Palm OS...

Maybe my next phone will be symbian powered ;)

Reply Score: 1

RE: hrm..
by collinm on Mon 26th Sep 2005 23:41 UTC in reply to "hrm.."
collinm Member since:
2005-07-15

the next step for palm is using linux....

after that palm os will be multitasking

Reply Score: 1

RE[2]: hrm..
by CPUGuy on Tue 27th Sep 2005 14:25 UTC in reply to "RE: hrm.."
CPUGuy Member since:
2005-07-06

Palm's CEO said they have no current plans for Linux or Symbian devices.

Reply Score: 1

RE: hrm..
by CPUGuy on Tue 27th Sep 2005 03:07 UTC in reply to "hrm.."
CPUGuy Member since:
2005-07-06

They are mantaining both lines (WM and PalOS).

Reply Score: 1

v you have to hand it to bill...
by Anonymous on Mon 26th Sep 2005 23:47 UTC
Question
by Anonymous on Tue 27th Sep 2005 00:33 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

I hear a lot of whining about Palm going with Windows Mobile 5 ... but have any of you even tried WM5?

Reply Score: 0

RE: Question
by Anonymous on Tue 27th Sep 2005 00:47 UTC in reply to "Question"
Anonymous Member since:
---

Yes i did and it sucked

Reply Score: 0

RE: Question
by Anonymous on Tue 27th Sep 2005 03:03 UTC in reply to "Question"
Anonymous Member since:
---

Yes, I have some experience with WM5 and it sucks. It is a total power hog and not very stable either. Forget about a decent battery life with WM5. Both, Linux and Palm OS are significantly better choices for a mobile device, particularly Linux: More performance at less power, longer battery life, more stable, more secure, smaller memory footprint, more flexible.

Reply Score: 1

RIP Palm
by Anonymous on Tue 27th Sep 2005 03:26 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

How many companies manage to survive after partnering with Microsoft? I doubt Palm will be one of the select few.

Reply Score: 0

RE: RIP Palm
by Anonymous on Tue 27th Sep 2005 10:17 UTC in reply to "RIP Palm"
Anonymous Member since:
---

How many companies manage to survive after partnering with Microsoft? I doubt Palm will be one of the select few.

Apple?

Reply Score: 0

This is a SAD day
by Anonymous on Tue 27th Sep 2005 03:41 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

I will never use a treo with windows. I do hope that this is just one model and not all the treo's to come. This way I will always buy the one with out windows. I love my 600, I get my company emails and more. We use Lotus Notes and I get all my PIM info synced wirelessly. So I do not know what corporate market they need to capture there is even software that works with exchange. Sounds to me like what they need is some good sales people and marketing with support. These lazy companies just want other people to do there work for them.

A sad day...

Reply Score: 2

PalmOS - The reason for buying
by Haicube on Tue 27th Sep 2005 06:20 UTC
Haicube
Member since:
2005-08-06

This is just such a strange move that started to worry me a while back.

The whole reason why someone would go buy a Palm is because the UI is simply superior to Windows Mobile / CE. This takes it's upper edge away completely, and I think it's safe to say that Palm will continue to go downhill from where they are now. This is the same thing as saying "Yo won Windows".

This is a very sad day indeed =(

Reply Score: 1

Bye Bye Palm OS
by devnull on Tue 27th Sep 2005 06:31 UTC
devnull
Member since:
2005-07-06

Like the above poster said, the reason many people will choose Palm OS over Windows or Symbian is the way its working, the looks and the simplicity.

By putting Windows Mobile on a Palm the is no reason, except for looks, to take a Palm device anymore.
I hope they(Palm) see this a a transformation journey and get ready for the real thing Palmux!

Reply Score: 1

I doubt Palm will keep releasing PalmOS
by Anonymous on Tue 27th Sep 2005 07:20 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

Along with this losing move of delivering Treo+WM5, 240x240px, the next products palm are releasing (Zire 22 and Tungsten X) will be Palm0S 5.4 powered.It seems Palm is stucked in a non-innovation cycle. Treo 700 should have been Cobalt-Powered and not WM5!!!!
Cobalt (The would-be 6.0) exists just as emulation software,and development is discontinued. and I haven´t seen any Linux progress since the Linux adventure announce from Palm.
One of the first things we should have witnessed is an official Palm Desktop for Linux operating systems. Instead of that,the Linux community is constantly struggling to make Desktop PIM apps compatible with the palm gadgets. I don´t see a true will to support Linux on the part of Palm. Also I´m sure the agreement with MS includes some blockade to the Linux way imposed by Gates.
This way not only Microsoft wins the whole mobile computing gadget´s market, it also bans Linux compatibility with these devices. So the Linux-Palm tandem will eventually die, and if you want to use a Desktop PC+PDA they want to force you into windows as the only available way to go.
Moreover PalmSource has recently acquired by the japanese company that manufactures the NetFront browser, so expect no more OS development from then either (at least outside the asia market)
The only alternative way from now on is Sharp Zaurus+Qtopia.
Wish Palm had dealed with Trolltech instead of MS.
The Death of Palm is a long-announced one:
Since Sony discontinued their Clié products, that technologically speakin where the hardware spearhead for the palm computing platform, there have been too many fails and delays: Palm was veeery late to release any WiFi enabled handheld, ant it failed altogether at releasing Palm OS6 (Cobalt).
I wish I was wrong, but I´m afraid we are witnessing the death of the palm-computing mobile platform, ant that the Zire 22 and Tungsten X will be their last products.
Rest In Peace, Palm.

Reply Score: 0

Palm is on it´s way to the grave
by Anonymous on Tue 27th Sep 2005 14:46 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

Ms will extract any remaining lifeforce out of Palm.

Reply Score: 0

It's dead
by Anonymous on Tue 27th Sep 2005 17:49 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

Let's switch to Symbian, now.

Reply Score: 0

no way
by Anonymous on Tue 27th Sep 2005 22:37 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

My Treo 650 has never once crashed after months of solid use. I'm sticking with this, I moved away from my (VERY) last Windows powered device (imate jam) to the 650 and have never looked back. I won't go there again, it's _downright clunky_ that WM OS...

Reply Score: 0

come on PALM...
by Anonymous on Wed 28th Sep 2005 00:49 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

Since you are now going with Windows why not let go of BeOS. Let it loose out into the wild and let the community have at it...please.

Reply Score: 0

eh
by Anonymous on Wed 28th Sep 2005 05:03 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

1) palm does not own palmOS at all
2) windows mobile (formerly called pocketPC) is cheaper to license!
3) windows devices have been outselling palm ones.


... hmm.. if you were a company called palm in this position what would you do?

They should have renamed palmOS something else because ACCESS ltd just cashes in on Palm, Inc's trademark

Reply Score: 0

PalmOS please
by Anonymous on Thu 29th Sep 2005 19:19 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

As the saying goes: when Microsoft finally markets something that doesn't suck, it'll be a vacuum cleaner.
I'll stick with my 650 and PalmOS, thanks.

Reply Score: 0