Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 16th Oct 2005 10:25 UTC
Features, Office OpenOffice.org made available for free download a third release candidate of Version 2.0 of its popular open-source office suite Friday. The release includes bug fixes only and no new features.
Order by: Score:
...and no new features.
by dylansmrjones on Sun 16th Oct 2005 11:42 UTC
dylansmrjones
Member since:
2005-10-02

Weeeeeh ;) ... That's nice ;)

Off to downloading ;)

Reply Score: 1

Thanks, openoffice devs!
by Anonymous on Sun 16th Oct 2005 12:10 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

I would really like to say a big "THANK YOU" to all those people involved in the development of openoffice!! Openoffice is our present and future!!

Reply Score: 0

On MacOS X?
by Anonymous on Sun 16th Oct 2005 12:17 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

This doesn't seem to be available on other platforms than Linux and Windows. Or am I mistaken?

Reply Score: 0

RE: On MacOS X?
by Anonymous on Sun 16th Oct 2005 12:30 UTC in reply to "On MacOS X?"
Anonymous Member since:
---
RE: On MacOS X?
by endy on Sun 16th Oct 2005 12:34 UTC in reply to "On MacOS X?"
endy Member since:
2005-09-02

The native OS X verison is on the way but apparently they are having trouble finding developers so it will be a few months late.

http://www.techweb.com/wire/26801994

Reply Score: 2

RE: On MacOS X?
by molnarcs on Sun 16th Oct 2005 17:15 UTC in reply to "On MacOS X?"
molnarcs Member since:
2005-09-10

On FreeBSD since yesteday.

Reply Score: 1

Issue #55330
by saxiyn on Sun 16th Oct 2005 13:29 UTC
saxiyn
Member since:
2005-07-08

The article refers to #i55330#. For the curious, here's the link:

http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55330

This was caused by compatibility hack for OOo 1.0 series, which saved *transparency* instead of *opacity* in svg:stroke-opacity attribute. Ugh.

Reply Score: 1

StarOffice8 vs. OO2
by Anonymous on Sun 16th Oct 2005 13:36 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

I am guessing that since StarOffice 8 was already released and OO is still fixing bugs before release that OO would be the more stable of the two?

Reply Score: 0

RE: StarOffice8 vs. OO2
by Anonymous on Sun 16th Oct 2005 13:56 UTC in reply to "StarOffice8 vs. OO2"
Anonymous Member since:
---

StarOffice is released for Windows, Linux and Solaris only, therefore any bugs in OpenOffice that pertain to other platforms are not relevant to SO8. I believe most of the bugs fixed on this RC3 are Mac related, therefore not relevant to SO.

Reply Score: 1

RE[2]: StarOffice8 vs. OO2
by Accident on Sun 16th Oct 2005 14:19 UTC in reply to "RE: StarOffice8 vs. OO2"
Accident Member since:
2005-07-29

StarOffice has other features that are not availible in OOo.

Reply Score: 1

Rotten download page
by Marcellus on Sun 16th Oct 2005 15:02 UTC
Marcellus
Member since:
2005-08-26

I went to the download page... Selected language, then OS, and then I could select download site...
'Lo and behold, that particular site didn't have RC3.
Click the back button to go back to select a new download site.
The list is empty, but language and os is still selected.
Not until I deselected and reselected os, did I get to pick a new download site.

Reply Score: 1

Still no installer
by skamp on Sun 16th Oct 2005 15:47 UTC
skamp
Member since:
2005-07-06

Still no binary installer, only RPM's.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Still no installer
by Morty on Sun 16th Oct 2005 16:19 UTC
Morty
Member since:
2005-07-06

Well if you click on the RPM(on modern RPM based distributions at lest) in you filemanger it opens the binary installer or package manger as it's sometimes called.

Reply Score: 1

RE[2]: Still no installer
by Anonymous on Mon 17th Oct 2005 06:09 UTC in reply to "RE: Still no installer"
Anonymous Member since:
---

As you said, "on modern RPM based distributions at lest" and you forgot to say while in X with a "good" filemanager ;)
It's really ugly to use a RPM on non RPM based distributions... I hope OO developers will consider making a binary installer or at least use Autopackage.

Reply Score: 0

v StarOffice8 vs. OO2
by Anonymous on Sun 16th Oct 2005 16:23 UTC
RE: StarOffice8 vs. OO2
by DigitalAxis on Sun 16th Oct 2005 16:40 UTC in reply to "StarOffice8 vs. OO2"
DigitalAxis Member since:
2005-08-28

Wow, reverse NIH syndrome.

Reply Score: 1

RE: StarOffice8 vs. OO2
by pojo on Sun 16th Oct 2005 19:11 UTC in reply to "StarOffice8 vs. OO2"
pojo Member since:
2005-10-05

Gee, that's funny. I didn't know that Sun had an office near Flint Michigan.

Do you telecommute?

dig -x 68.62.33.1
pcp09086491pcs.flint01.mi.comcast.net.

Reply Score: 1

RE[2]: StarOffice8 vs. OO2
by Anonymous on Sun 16th Oct 2005 21:19 UTC in reply to "RE: StarOffice8 vs. OO2"
Anonymous Member since:
---

Not in Flint, but in Detroit. They really are not that far apart.

Reply Score: 0

RE: StarOffice8 vs. OO2
by Anonymous on Mon 17th Oct 2005 01:15 UTC in reply to "StarOffice8 vs. OO2"
Anonymous Member since:
---

LOL man you are such a lier saying you work for Sun. OOo is a great Office Suit I do all my University stuff in it and do presentations in front of whole class in MS Office based pcs and everything works fine.

Reply Score: 0

First impression...
by Marcellus on Sun 16th Oct 2005 16:52 UTC
Marcellus
Member since:
2005-08-26

Speed in Writer and Calc seems to have increased a lot since I last tried OOo/SO, but the Math part... horribly slow. Takes around a second from last input to seeing the result.

Haven't had time to actually USE these programs yet, but my first general impression is that it's getting better, but still have a long long way to go.

Reply Score: 1

Roadmap 3.0?
by Haicube on Sun 16th Oct 2005 17:07 UTC
Haicube
Member since:
2005-08-06

OOo 2.0 is all fine and dandy, even though I find it to lack quite a few features. Knowing it's a bit early, but are there any roadmap to 3.0 and what is planned 'til then?

What especially interests me is the charting engine. I hope they start doing some miracles here, as everything it puts out now doesn't look good (if you ask me)

Reply Score: 1

Bullshit
by Anonymous on Sun 16th Oct 2005 17:31 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

---The funny thing is I work for Sun and was told do not use OpenOffice since it was written by a bunch of hackers and is full of bugs!

Bullshit. The vast majority of Oo is programmed by Sun, not "hackers".

Sounds like FUD to me.

Reply Score: 0

...
by suryad on Sun 16th Oct 2005 17:35 UTC
suryad
Member since:
2005-07-09

Great. I wish performance were higher than the current releases....but oh well. And I thought Sun bought the core code from a bunch of hackers...

Reply Score: 1

Re: Bullshit
by Haicube on Sun 16th Oct 2005 20:36 UTC
Haicube
Member since:
2005-08-06

I'm not so sure you're right here. As far as I heard, OOo (Star Office) was actually bought by Sun a long time ago from some other company. Most of the stuff which was developed before Sun bought it is actually still there.

reading some notes from current developers, some are a bit irritated over "leftover" code from the ol' days. Not sure how much substance is in there, but that's what I've heard.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Re: Bullshit
by Anonymous on Mon 17th Oct 2005 00:25 UTC in reply to "Re: Bullshit"
Anonymous Member since:
---

Sun bought Star Office (a commercial, closed-source product at that time) from Star Division, a German company.
Then they open-sourced the f--ker and called the result "OpenOffice.org".

Reply Score: 0

sweet!
by Anonymous on Sun 16th Oct 2005 23:32 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

I just downloded & tested out on my Gentoo box...man it's NICE! Fast, clean, and Base is damn nice! Combine OOo w/ Evolution for email and you've got a complete office suite which most definitely rivals MS Office...and you can't beat the price.

Reply Score: 0

Why would I want to complain?
by Anonymous on Mon 17th Oct 2005 00:45 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

Thanks OpenOffice developers for all youe hard work on deveoping an extreemly complex application. Double thanks for letting me have a Office suit for free, I cannot complain about it in any way because it's free.

Yes I know, what part of FREE dont people get?, because now I can do professional letters, slideshows on my computer for FREE. MS Office is great but for desktop users it's a complete waste of money.

Reply Score: 0

Not trying to spread FUD...
by JonO on Tue 18th Oct 2005 00:59 UTC
JonO
Member since:
2005-09-23

...but the first word document I tried to open in OO.org2 was corrupted. Abiword handled it fine. :-(

Reply Score: 1