Linked by Adam S on Thu 20th Oct 2005 18:19 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes Today, we roll out the OSNews Meta Blog. We are trying something new. Whereas OSNews proper is moderated and logged, the OSNews Meta Blog is here solely to discuss the site, without bombing an unrelated news thread. It's unmoderated, anonymous, and, perhaps best of all.... XHTML compliant. For details, please visit this post.
Order by: Score:
v RE
by Anonymous (Staff) on Thu 20th Oct 2005 19:05 UTC
Why call it Meta Blog...
by Anonymous (Staff) on Thu 20th Oct 2005 19:17 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---
Fans: 0

When the practical reality (assuming people actually are tempted to use it instead of spewing in standard threads) is that it is OSNews Graffiti, complete with the pissing matches like street gangs engage in? ;)

Forum?
by ZaNkY (1.92) on Thu 20th Oct 2005 20:20 UTC
ZaNkY
Member since:
2005-10-18
Fans: 0

lol, Looks like a good idea... Looks somewhat i like a mini forum to me.....

I'll check it out later today.

--ZaNkY

Finally
by TaterSalad (2.76) on Thu 20th Oct 2005 20:20 UTC
TaterSalad
Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 3

I get to swear and cuss up a storm and no one will know its me ;)

Meta blogs? (off-topic)
by Anonymous (Staff) on Thu 20th Oct 2005 20:25 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---
Fans: 0

At one point, I thought I invented the idea of a metablog, but now I see it here.

In my case, it was an extravagance of wishing to stop polluting my personal weblog (which I intended to be of a certain sort of writing) with site update news (i.e. "I just updated to Wordpress 1.5 and updated my theme!") Having studied philosophy, I thought "metablog" was a clever term.

I've thought to myself before, hey, this is a good idea. Maybe real sites should do this. Like OSNews, Slashdot, and FARK could all keep their news about their own sites constrained to one area so as to not pollute their content.

This, however, is the first site I've actually seen doing this. Can I ask, where'd you get the idea? What other sites have metablogs?

(keeping myself anonymous as to not embarrass myself by claiming to have invented something I'm sure I didn't)

RE: Meta blogs? (off-topic)
by Adam S (Staff) on Thu 20th Oct 2005 21:08 UTC in reply to "Meta blogs? (off-topic)"
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01
Fans: 16

Can I ask, where'd you get the idea?

From our our beta site. We used to host beta.osnews.com, and there were some people that had really good input. The current osnews site is very kludgy, and I really wanted a place to be able to speak to users about the site without being so pretentious as to mash it in with real news. So a "meta blog" was a great idea.

Hopefully, people will use it. I have a lot of things I'd like to discuss there.

Nested
by Anonymous (Staff) on Thu 20th Oct 2005 21:08 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---
Fans: 0

How about having comments nested. It makes it easier when following a discussion.

.02c worth; add salt to taste and stir.

Printer-friendly
by BrianH (2.4) on Thu 20th Oct 2005 21:27 UTC
BrianH
Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 1

Since you are experimenting with XHTML, why not have a print media section for making the regular page printer friendly when printed, instead of a seperate printer-friendly page? It works, and this seems like a good site to experiment with it.

RE: Printer-friendly
by BrianH (2.4) on Thu 20th Oct 2005 21:28 UTC in reply to "Printer-friendly"
BrianH Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 1

I meant a print media section in your CSS style code.

RE[2]: Printer-friendly
by Adam S (Staff) on Thu 20th Oct 2005 22:15 UTC in reply to "RE: Printer-friendly"
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01
Fans: 16

Good idea. Write the stylesheet, and I'd be happy to include the @import statement.

I may experiment with that at some point, but for now, I'd invite you to have a stab at it.

Possible bug
by sappyvcv (2.36) on Thu 20th Oct 2005 23:35 UTC
sappyvcv
Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 11

I emailed this to Adam, so sorry for "cross-posting" (sort of), but it's a weird bug.

"I've been trying to post a comment in the article "Moderation: Ain't What it Should Be", but can not.

Using Opera and Firefox, I get "You did not correctly confirm the text in the image" every single time. With IE, it simply says "Cannot display the page".

I posted earlier fine, and since it does this across browsers, I have a feeling there's something on the server end."

RE: Possible bug
by Adam S (Staff) on Thu 20th Oct 2005 23:42 UTC in reply to "Possible bug"
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01
Fans: 16

It's a browser bug. IE can't display a URL that long. I will have to change the app to not pass that much info in a URL.

I should have it ironed out tomorrow. Try using Firefox, it will work. You should be using Firefox anyway ;)

RE[2]: Possible bug
by sappyvcv (2.36) on Thu 20th Oct 2005 23:43 UTC in reply to "RE: Possible bug"
sappyvcv Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 11

I said that I tried firefox, same problem as Opera. It's not a browser issue.

And don't tell me to use Firefox, I'm a diehard Opera user damn it! <shakes fist>

RE[3]: Possible bug
by dylansmrjones (2.6) on Fri 21st Oct 2005 00:18 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Possible bug"
dylansmrjones Member since:
2005-10-02
Fans: 21

I have the same problem as sappyvcv. I'm using FireFox 1.0.7 [danish].

I don't believe it's a browser issue at all.

RE: Possible bug
by ckknight (1.52) on Thu 20th Oct 2005 23:53 UTC in reply to "Possible bug"
ckknight Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 0

Same issue, and I have a pretty big comment.

On another note, the [br] tag doesn't work unless I have a closing [/br] tag, which is just odd.

RE[2]: Possible bug
by Adam S (Staff) on Thu 20th Oct 2005 23:58 UTC in reply to "RE: Possible bug"
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01
Fans: 16

Don't use br. Just press enter - line breaks are preserved.

RE[3]: Possible bug
by ckknight (1.52) on Thu 20th Oct 2005 23:59 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Possible bug"
ckknight Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 0

That does not show up in the preview, it looks like I just have one big blob if I don't use the [br]'s.

RE[4]: Possible bug
by Adam S (Staff) on Fri 21st Oct 2005 00:00 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Possible bug"
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01
Fans: 16

ok, thanks. i'll look into that.

RE: Possible bug
by Adam S (Staff) on Fri 21st Oct 2005 00:38 UTC in reply to "Possible bug"
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01
Fans: 16

try now. see what happens.

there is a big that i can reproduce that ALWAYS says the first try with the image is incorrect, but subsequent tries work. I'm attacking that now... thus far, unsuccessfully.

RE[2]: Possible bug
by sappyvcv (2.36) on Fri 21st Oct 2005 00:42 UTC in reply to "RE: Possible bug"
sappyvcv Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 11

Nope. Tried 4 times with each browser.

Ditto
by Anonymous (Staff) on Thu 20th Oct 2005 23:50 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---
Fans: 0

>>> I said that I tried firefox,

same here...

RE: Possible bug
by Anonymous (Staff) on Fri 21st Oct 2005 00:00 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---
Fans: 0

Actually, in the preview linebrakes were completely ignored for me. Even writing [br] and [/br] by hand.

RE[2]: Possible bug
by Adam S (Staff) on Fri 21st Oct 2005 00:02 UTC in reply to "RE: Possible bug"
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01
Fans: 16

that's fixed.