Post a Comment
I respect you guys as a tech site, but in a purely economical snese, Google did no snatching. Considering the condensed state of the shares concentrated in the hands of a few key investors, Google's sway over AOL is minimal. Heck, one man, Carl Icahn, has more influence with his shares than Google does.
Barring that, however, Microsoft could still buy more shares itself, expecially as current investors jump off a percieved sinking ship. The next 6-18 months will be very interesting over at AOL/Time Warner, especially if the possible AOL spinoff occurs. If such an IPO is facilitated, look for another ticker symbol, MSFT, to purchase large quantities. Many of us in the tech community do not like AOL, granted, but their name itself is unforgetable and thus holds value.
Part of the deal was that google would favor AOL content in searches. I guess they only abide by their moto of do no evil when it suits them.
Oh pulease, they'll do what they've always done, shove it in a big blue box at the top showing that its THEIR suggestion because its THE content THEY'RE providing - there is nothing unethical about that.
As for the deal, AOL TIme Warner needed a partner who had its internet shit together and I'm sorry, AOL is hardly what I would call a company who has its internet shit together, from their bloated website, crap media content, unstable and unreliable instant messaging, I'm not surprised!
Google will have a large presence at the 2006 Southern California Linux Expo, SCALE 4x. In addition to being a Silver Sponsor of this year's show. They will exhibit on the expo floor and ahve provided 2 speakers Chris Dibona and Dan Kegel.
For more details see: http://www.socallinuxexpo.org/speakers.php
It's all downhill for Google's reputation as an open, innovative and dynamic company. They were bought by the devil when they did their IPO and now they are getting in bed with AOL-TimeWarner.
It's no secret that Google wants to be in our hearts and minds as much as Microsoft and TimeWarner and other big corporation.
Atleast if your going to comment on something atleast know what your talking about, Google has been in bed with TW for years.
Who do you think provides AOL Search, Google make a big profit from providing the AOL Search service.
It makes perfect sence for Google to invest in a company that makes them alot of money
I don't see why people are making such a big fuss about this, since there is not enough information to panic about yet.
Just like the article states, it is not known if Google is going to favor AOL content in the searches themselves or alongside. If its the former, I *would* panic. But if its the latter, it would be just an issue of seeing AOL content together with the text ads. That I don't really care, since the searches themselves would not be affected.
Logic tells me that it is the latter. I don't see a reason why Google would go for the former, especially since AOL is not doing that well anyways.
- Seiken
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/research/cm/cm05/telecommunications.pdf
is where you can find the information on the UK. AOL is not a force.
The long term puts on Google are looking better and better every day.




.