Post a Comment
"We even had on the PowerPC this thing called Virtual PC that lets you get Windows capability over on their hardware."
He sounds disappointed with this whole Mactel thing, even if it's between the lines.
And next day it will be "We even had on the PowerPC this thing called Office..."
It better be better than Windows Mobile 5. I'm thoroughly dissapointed in my handheld's software (except Excel, it's exceptional as usual).
So far I've:
locked up activesync.
wished for a disconnect button on activesync.
put activesync in infinite "looking for changes.." loops several times.
put file explorer into a cpu intensive infinite loop changing a folder's name (while having its contents open). Had to do a hard reboot to stop it.
locked the handheld up while in "hibernate". Had to pull the battery to get it back.
lost data during a sync operation (a folder was inexplicably emptied of its sub folders but not files).
wished for a find function in IE.
And I've only had it since Christmas.
I'd blame the handheld, but most of it works perfectly; it's only a few Microsoft programs that are completely broken.
Anyway, that's mostly off topic; but this news item is mostly not about Operating Systems anyway. So I feel vindicated
.
Not going to happen any time soon.
While it may be fine for computer monitors where the signal only has to go a foot or two over a wire, and doesn't need to be stored indefinately, television signals actually have to be broadcast, and stored for long periods of time, both in a home format (hd-dvd, blu-ray, etc), and also stored by the networks and cable stations.
Neither group would take well to having to upgrade recording, playback, and monitors every few years. Most people don't even have HDTVs yet, and far too few stations outside of cities have hdtv broadcast ability of any decent level. Having them switch would probably cost enough to drive over the air network affiliates to go out of business and make most people balk.
Within my price range all the monitors could handle 1280x1024 for as long as I can remember having 17" monitors. My last one was supposed to be able to support up to that high, but it was a cheapo monitor that wouldn't handle it for some annoying reason, I'm glad I replaced it :-) .
Indeed, but what would be even cooler if you ask me is not making higher resolutions, it's actually widening the colours available.
Today we're stuck with RGB. Why not aim for a CMYK monitor which might enable more colours and make things more real. I'm not an expert on these things, but going for an even more wide format would even be cooler. In Offset Printshops they got like 7 colours and stuff, and they have Pantone colours available for instance. This is what really would make things hot if you ask me.
This, however would probably be very difficult for programmers to utilize, but it might be possible. Assuming someone makes a CMYK --> RGB translator which works actively in the gfx card to translate all old code before getting sent to the monitor.
I hope this becomes the next real thing, it's really what differs analogue from digital as far as my eyes can see for now. =)
Edited 2006-01-10 12:00



