Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 18:49 UTC, submitted by tedmg09130913
Mozilla & Gecko clones "The first security and stability update to Mozilla Firefox 1.5 has been released. It is recommended that all Firefox users upgrade to this latest version. Downloads are available from GetFirefox.com. The update is also available for other systems and languages. More details can be found in the Mozilla Firefox 1.5.0.1 release notes."
Order by: Score:
Notable Fixes
by DittoBox on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 19:23 UTC
DittoBox
Member since:
2005-07-08

If you're interested in a list of notable fixes:
http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/releases/1.5.0.1.html

Reply Score: 4

update
by blah_ect on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 19:42 UTC
blah_ect
Member since:
2005-07-26

Please remember to use the built in update feature with firefox instead of downloading the entire 1.5.0.1 binary like I did ;) For the impatient, under the "Help" menu is "Check for Update..."

-blah_ect

Reply Score: 4

RE: update
by jjmckay on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 19:44 UTC in reply to "update"
jjmckay Member since:
2005-11-11

I tried the built in update function that and it failed to connect. Also the http primary download timed out. The FTP link worked though, once I browsed to the correct location in the FTP directory tree.

Reply Score: 2

RE[2]: update
by chemical_scum on Fri 3rd Feb 2006 13:48 UTC in reply to "RE: update"
chemical_scum Member since:
2005-11-02

the built in update function that and it failed to connect

The built in update function worked fine for me. It autoupdadted Firefox on both my XP system at work, over broadband through the corporate firewall, and on my Linux box at home through dialup.

Reply Score: 1

RE: update
by Temcat on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 22:45 UTC in reply to "update"
Temcat Member since:
2005-10-18

Grayed out for me :-(

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051111 Firefox/1.5

Reply Score: 1

RE[2]: update
by ThawkTH on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 22:51 UTC in reply to "RE: update"
ThawkTH Member since:
2005-07-06

Me too...

Kanotix 2005-04 HD install...

Hmmmm...Update is completely grayed out.

Is this a precaution to make sure apt handles updates?

Todd

Reply Score: 1

RE[2]: update
by DittoBox on Fri 3rd Feb 2006 03:16 UTC in reply to "RE: update"
DittoBox Member since:
2005-07-08

Are you two sure you've got permissions setup properly? That is, are you running as administrator/root.

For those running *nix it's important to remember that your distribution may have disabled this, and that you'll want to use binaries or sources provided by your distro maintainer instead, as they're specialized for your distro.

For those running windows it's likely you're not running as adinistrator or the user who installed firefox originally, and thus you don't have the proper permissions to install updates to the binaries.

HTH

Reply Score: 1

Is it better than 1.07?
by bornagainenguin on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 20:00 UTC
bornagainenguin
Member since:
2005-08-07

I ask because I keep falling back to 1.07 instead of 1.5 for the simple reason that 1.5 is constantly timing out on me in situations where 1.07 will be fine or fly in.

Does anyone know if its worth mucking with?

--bornagainpenguin

Reply Score: 2

RE: Is it better than 1.07?
by kamper on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 20:21 UTC in reply to "Is it better than 1.07?"
kamper Member since:
2005-08-20

I ask because I keep falling back to 1.07 instead of 1.5 for the simple reason that 1.5 is constantly timing out on me in situations where 1.07 will be fine or fly in.

Does anyone know if its worth mucking with?


Given that this is a bugfix release, I think it would make sense to at least give it a try.

Reply Score: 3

Went Ok.
by Leoandru on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 20:06 UTC
Leoandru
Member since:
2006-01-15

Got a notification while I was browsing last night, I when through with the upgrade and restarted firefox. After a few hours of browsing I was running through my processes to kill an app when I noticed that Firefox was only using 30 Mb of Ram. I kept it open all night and the memory was stable around 30 - 35. Nice.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Went Ok.
by Finalzone on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 20:14 UTC in reply to "Went Ok."
Finalzone Member since:
2005-07-06

56.3 to 56.9 Mb of Ram usage with 12 opened tabs. Running on Fedora Rawhide. Interesting enough, I got fedora version at the same time of this announcement. Looks like Mozilla are more coordinated than ever.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Went Ok.
by A.H. on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 20:52 UTC in reply to "Went Ok."
A.H. Member since:
2005-11-11

I looked at my Task Manager and noted that Firefox was using about 65 Megs of RAM with only 3 tabs open. I close FF and reopened it with the same 3 tabs and now it's taking only 29 Megs.

Reply Score: 2

Not the last update
by nelvana2005 on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 20:07 UTC
nelvana2005
Member since:
2005-07-29

Another severe problem:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=324253
It is still not fixed so one more update is needed.

Reply Score: 2

Old?
by Fass on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 20:09 UTC
Fass
Member since:
2005-11-05

I got this over a week ago through the auto-update feature. Any reason why the "official" release took so long?

Reply Score: 1

RE: Old?
by smitty on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 20:40 UTC in reply to "Old?"
smitty Member since:
2005-10-13

It just became official. If you got it last week, then you are updating on the "beta" channel. That happens automatically if you installed the 1.5 beta and then upgraded to 1.5 final. There is a setting in firefox that will let you change this if you want. Otherwise your updates are all going to be betas.

Reply Score: 5

Memory
by Bobmeister on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 20:12 UTC
Bobmeister
Member since:
2005-07-06

One of the issues addressed, according to the release notes, were the memory leaks...so it does seem like they are addressing this issue (although it's not been a big issue for me as it is to many)...so for THAT REASON ALONE, it might be worth the fix.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Memory
by smitty on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 20:42 UTC in reply to "Memory"
smitty Member since:
2005-10-13

2 memory leaks were fixed, including 1 that may have been a major problem. But there are still many more to go and I can confirm that I'm still getting memory leaks although they seem to be happening slower than before. They've recently come up with a tool for finding these memory leaks so I expect many more fixes in the following months.

Reply Score: 3

RE: Memory
by Sartoris on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 23:31 UTC in reply to "Memory"
Sartoris Member since:
2005-07-07

Firefox(1.5.0.1) is using 102 Megs of memory right now with only one tab open. I still have to close the browser to make it release memory from closed tabs it seems.

Reply Score: 2

One bad thing with firefox 1.5
by Toad on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 20:41 UTC
Toad
Member since:
2005-11-27

Venkman javascript debugger is not yet fixed for 1.5; that I find is quite a miss, the most important tool/extension (for me) in firefox doesn't work.
Otherwise I am pleased with 1.5

Reply Score: 1

Nothin' for *nix
by ma_d on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 21:21 UTC
ma_d
Member since:
2005-06-29

Looks like only Windows users get to use the update feature most of the time... Oh well, I suppose I'll have to wait a week for it to pass through testing on my dist.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Nothin' for *nix
by Finalzone on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 21:51 UTC in reply to "Nothin' for *nix"
Finalzone Member since:
2005-07-06

Already have that version on Fedora Rawhide. =) Some users even create their package version from spec for their favorite distros.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Nothin' for *nix?
by glarepate on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 23:33 UTC in reply to "Nothin' for *nix"
glarepate Member since:
2006-01-04

I'm on Slackware 10.2 and got a notice this morning shortly after I started it up that the udate was downloaded and ready and that I could install it now or later. I read a litle more here on OSNews, closed it out and restarted it and I'm upgraded.

Reply Score: 1

RE[2]: Nothin' for *nix?
by ma_d on Fri 3rd Feb 2006 05:57 UTC in reply to "RE: Nothin' for *nix?"
ma_d Member since:
2005-06-29

Seems Arch is upgraded already too. Rare.

Reply Score: 1

RE[2]: Nothin' for *nix?
by Dark_Knight on Fri 3rd Feb 2006 18:11 UTC in reply to "Nothin' for *nix"
Dark_Knight Member since:
2005-07-10
rakamaka
Member since:
2005-08-12

When Average Joe installs FF and starts browsing...
By Default FF, saves password, saves forms filled, saves cache, save cookies

Although it has option of clear private data, how many average users know about it after installation?

saved passwd,cookies,forms are hackers delight. If under assumption of FF more secure by default, average Joe might be storing sensitive info in computer....

I clear manually everyhing at exiting browser. But that's way safest browser should be..by default

Reply Score: 2

Kroc Member since:
2005-11-10

Or they can use IE, where all their saved forms, passwords and cookies can be stolen without any prompts. What would you like, an apple or an orange?

Reply Score: 1

Wrawrat Member since:
2005-06-30

Not using these features would actually be safer, since you can forget to clear the private data cache.

But I'd like to remind you that Firefox is asking you to enable one of these features before using it on a web page, e.g. it asks you to enable saved passwords just before using it for the first time. I didn't used MSIE for a while, but it used to behave the same way. Same thing for Konqueror.

So... what's your point?

Reply Score: 3

glarepate Member since:
2006-01-04

When I do a fresh install of FF it asks me if I want to save passwords. And even though I am set to save pws in my Preferences when I go to a new site and log in for the first time it asks me again, it doesn't presume. If yours doesn't do this maybe FF thinks you are an average joe and it thinks I'm not. (^;

More likely you need to do a fresh install instead of installing over the existing version. Maybe rename your .mozilla/firefox (for *nixes anyway, YFFDNMV) directory too. FF is a lot better at updating your extensions and plugins nowadays but you can still test the results that way.

Either way there is a checkbox to use to turn this off in Preferences. You may also set it to clear any saved data when FF closes. Same for Saved Forms and cache.

[pointlessoverkill]
If you are on Windows the Prefs. are accessed from the Tools menu. On Linux it's on the Edit menu. I suspect that all *nixes access Prefs the same way (especially if you run the Linux binary in FreeBSD) but can't say so for sure.
[/pointlessoverkill]

Reply Score: 1

Never used autoupdate
by libray on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 21:53 UTC
libray
Member since:
2005-08-27

By installing via the standard means, you update your OS's package manager and what it thinks you have installed. The auto update feature does not support this.

I'm using pkgsrc on NetBSD and Solaris and through its security auditing tool, audit-packages, it checks my installed version of packages against known vulnerable packages. Auto update may be nice to have , like other types, but if it does not support system auditing, then its no good for me.

Reply Score: 3

Automatic
by SlackerJack on Thu 2nd Feb 2006 23:24 UTC
SlackerJack
Member since:
2005-11-12

Firefox prompted me for the update but i'm running it the tared version inside /home. Running Gentoo here and the update worked great.

Reply Score: 1

Works for me
by CharAznable on Fri 3rd Feb 2006 00:22 UTC
CharAznable
Member since:
2005-07-06

Worked perfectly both in Windows XP and in Ubuntu.

Reply Score: 1

once again extensions break though ;-p
by ayembee on Fri 3rd Feb 2006 08:27 UTC
ayembee
Member since:
2005-09-15

i have an extension that works without problem in every verison of firefox from 0.9 through to 1.5 (and netscape, flock, mozilla/etc). however, firefox version 1.5.0.1 breaks it, even after a version bump to install.rdf, with an error message "Firefox could not install this item because of a failure in Chrome Registration. Please contact the author about this problem"

well i AM the author, and i haven't got the faintest idea why what is nominally a minor point release would suddenly break it. is there any way of getting an error message that is actually useful (eg: what part of chrome registration failed) or somehow debugging it?

extension is here: http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/10222974/

(and yes, i tried bumped the maxversion in there (at that link its currently just 1.5, i tried with 1.5.0.* and 1.6 on my local pc, but didn't help)

Reply Score: 1

Manyon Member since:
2006-02-04

The error message you are getting is reffered to in a supposed bug fix. Having a look here may help

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311480

Reply Score: 1

Nice.
by JonO on Fri 3rd Feb 2006 15:27 UTC
JonO
Member since:
2005-09-23

I've been modded down before for simply saying that the 1.5 release has been horrid for me, so maybe now I can redeem myself. ;-) Only a minor update, but it has fixed quite a few of my issues...memory usage is still more then I'd like, but many leaks have been fixed. Stability is improved, and rendering speed is a bit higher. Plus a few pages that used to send Firefox into a seizure seem to work fine now.

For myself and my purposes, Opera and Konqueror both are superior, but a few of my FF complaints are fixed. Maybe the next few updates can bring me back.

Reply Score: 2

snozzberry
Member since:
2005-11-14

Downside of using BeatnikPad's processor-optimized Deer Park 1.5 builds is that they don't appear to be aware of these patches or able to integrate them. In other words, you're dependent on Neil Lee continuing to rebuild the entire package for these architectures and downloading the entire package, not patches (one of the largest reasons for FF 1.5's existence).

Neil's site:
http://www.beatnikpad.com

Reply Score: 1

Firewall Collision
by stfranklin on Fri 3rd Feb 2006 18:32 UTC
stfranklin
Member since:
2006-02-03

When I opened the extension window, Firefox notified me that a new version was available and offered to install it automatically. I agreed, it exited, installed the file, and then tried to reopen itself. It collided with Zone Alarm and rather than allowing Zone Alarm to ask if I wanted to let Firefox access the web, it just locked up the system. I was not impressed.

Reply Score: 1

rcsteiner
Member since:
2005-07-12

Sometimes things work just fine in terms of text entry, but sometimes many of the keys drop out and start doing stuff I do not want. The apostrophe and forward slash keys bring up the Find bar, arrow navigation in edit boxes and on pages will not work, etc. It happened in the middle of this message, even, which is ANNOYING.

I am going to drop back to 1.07 again (which did not have this issue).

Reply Score: 1

All of mine worked fine
by caulktel on Sat 4th Feb 2006 04:52 UTC
caulktel
Member since:
2005-09-21

Slackware 10.2, Win XP, OS 10.4.4, all updated just fine. On the Mac I surfed for hours last night, FF was only using 38 meg of ram with one tab opened. I think they have improved the memory leak problem a bunch.

Reply Score: 1