Post a Comment
"Intel GMA 900 graphics" Maybe to make porting OS X onto it much more easily?
First, please tell me you didn't just post that! Seriously. ;-)
Second, if for some bizarre reason they did, they should have used a GMA950, like the Mac mini. In that very same article, a ThinkPad with a GMA950 had *twice* the FPS as the Alienware Sentia m3200:
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/sentia-m3200.ars/5
In any case, US$1,477 is way too much for what this machine delivers.
"If you're like me-not rich and in need of a tan-then that last claim is a big sell and the idea of not having to settle for the Lada of laptops if you're on a budget is significant."
Too bad Alienware are more or less just rebranding such "Lada" laptops, eh?
As the owner of a "Lada" laptop (I'm guessing he is talking of non-brand/unbranded laptops) I can honestly say I much rather buy a "Lada" for ~$500 than an Alienware with a fancy case for ~$1000.
Sure, it's just a sleek mousepad with their logo on it. But it's not just any mousepad: it's a Func Surface 1030. This is a household name in gaming and it's still the king of accurate optical pads in my opinion.
Wow! a Mousepad! I was like "wow thats a nice mousepad", and then I looked at mine.. and it was exactly the same. Except mine cost me $10 on sale and has an "Allsop" logo on it instead.
(for reference http://www.allsop.com/mouse-pads/pc-gamers-mouse-pads/model-27814/c... you cant even see the logo 99% of the time.)
And my Windows laptop cost me less than a $1000USD - two years ago, its 12" and less than an inch thick. Good old Averatec.
Edited 2006-04-04 17:46



