Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th Aug 2006 11:19 UTC, submitted by René Rebe
Linux T2 SDE 6.0.0 has been released with various prebuilt .iso images for AMD64, i386, PPC, PPC64, and SPARC64. The various architectures include support for Intel Macs as well as Sun's T1 Niagara CPU, and ship with Xorg 7.0, GCC 4.1.1, KDE 3.5.4, GNOME 2.14.3, and much more. T2 SDE is not just a common Linux distribution - it is a flexible open source System Development Environment. T2 allows the creation of custom distributions. Currently the Linux kernel is used - but they are expanding to MINIX, Hurd, OpenDarwin, and OpenBSD.
Order by: Score:
Is it like RockLinux ?
by compukid on Fri 25th Aug 2006 11:37 UTC
compukid
Member since:
2005-12-17

Is it like RockLinux? http://www.rocklinux.org

Reply Score: 3

RE: Is it like RockLinux ?
by RandomGuy on Fri 25th Aug 2006 12:23 UTC in reply to "Is it like RockLinux ?"
RandomGuy Member since:
2006-07-30

"T2 started as a community driven fork from the ROCK Linux Project with the aim to create a decentralized development and clean a framework for spin-off projects and customized distributions. Another goal was to provide a more continous release stream for stable security updates."

From their homepage. So I'd guess the short answer is yes.

Reply Score: 2

hurd
by deanlinkous on Fri 25th Aug 2006 11:43 UTC
deanlinkous
Member since:
2006-06-19

Currently the linux kernel is used but they are expanding to ..... hurd? Is the HURD a kernel?

Reply Score: 1

RE: hurd
by bkavanaugh on Fri 25th Aug 2006 14:07 UTC in reply to "hurd"
bkavanaugh Member since:
2005-07-07
RE[2]: hurd
by deanlinkous on Fri 25th Aug 2006 14:28 UTC in reply to "RE: hurd"
deanlinkous Member since:
2006-06-19

The Hurd is a collection of servers that run on the Mach microkernel to implement file systems, network protocols, file access control, and other features that are implemented by the Unix kernel or similar kernels (such as Linux).

Reply Score: 2

RE[3]: hurd
by Michael on Fri 25th Aug 2006 15:08 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: hurd"
Michael Member since:
2005-07-01

Pedantry, thy name is deanlinkous.

That should read Hurd+Mach then, not that Hurd runs on anything else (does it?).

Reply Score: 1

RE[4]: hurd
by deanlinkous on Fri 25th Aug 2006 15:20 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: hurd"
deanlinkous Member since:
2006-06-19

:) Is that a compliment.
I just don't see a collection of servers being a kernel. It does provide some of the services that a larger kernel would but the hurd itself isn't a kernel. Oh and yes hurd does run on other microkernels or it is a WIP.

Reply Score: 1

RE[4]: hurd
by twenex on Fri 25th Aug 2006 16:36 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: hurd"
twenex Member since:
2006-04-21

Until L4 replaces Mach, it's officially "GNU/Mach HURD", I believe.

Mach runs on the processor, it's the HURD that runs on top of Mach.

Reply Score: 1

RE[5]: hurd
by deanlinkous on Sat 26th Aug 2006 05:21 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: hurd"
deanlinkous Member since:
2006-06-19

L4? I thought the last thought was about using the coyotos kernel stuff? I am sooooo lost when it comes to exactly what the herd working on the hurd is doing it wouldn't surprise me if we were back fullcircle to a mach based kernel.

Reply Score: 1

Who's more meta?
by Wes Felter on Fri 25th Aug 2006 16:11 UTC
Wes Felter
Member since:
2005-11-15

Now that we have so many meta-distros (T2, Gentoo, rPath, etc.) I think it's time for a meta-meta-distro that allows you to build any of them...

Reply Score: 4

RE: Who's more meta?
by twenex on Fri 25th Aug 2006 16:40 UTC in reply to "Who's more meta?"
twenex Member since:
2006-04-21

Oh no, then we'll soon have 5 meta-meta-distros and pretty soon after that we'll have to build a meta-meta-meta-distro!

Edited 2006-08-25 16:41

Reply Score: 1

uh
by deanlinkous on Fri 25th Aug 2006 16:17 UTC
deanlinkous
Member since:
2006-06-19

How about MoMeta? Hey you want MoMeta on that sandwich?
Maybe a website with a bunch of checkboxes and you go thru and select which parts you want and it rolls it into a iso for you?

Reply Score: 1

RE: uh
by twenex on Fri 25th Aug 2006 16:41 UTC in reply to "uh"
twenex Member since:
2006-04-21

There used to be a site that would compile a custom kernel for you if you clicked on checkboxes. Wonder what happened to it...

Reply Score: 1

RE: uh
by kernelpanicked on Mon 28th Aug 2006 05:29 UTC in reply to "uh"
kernelpanicked Member since:
2006-02-01

Deleted Comment

Edited 2006-08-28 05:30

Reply Score: 1

I wait for the openbsd...
by fithisux on Fri 25th Aug 2006 20:53 UTC
fithisux
Member since:
2006-01-22

flavor

Reply Score: 1