OSNews

It runs on a real hard drive instead of flash and it only has the few libs installed, so I expect it to boot in less than 15 seconds. It is running Qt Embedded with a custom UI btw.

My zaurus C3000 has a real hard drive and still takes at least 1m30 to boot. Good news is suspend. 2 seconds. I normally never do a real boot.

Your Zaurus runs the full OS, while these PMPs only need the bare minimum. My Linux-based phones which are also using a custom UI on top of Qt Embedded usually boot between 15 and 30 seconds. I expect this PMP with hard drive to be equally fast to boot.

Someone should mention the zaurus costs around twice as much.

>It sucks watching movies on such a small screen.

This is the same for all PMPs. I am personally used to watching stuff on small screens, although the 604's screen is pretty big compared to most PMPs in the market.

>Battery life just isn't there. One or two movies tops.

They can easily pull out two 2-hour movies. And this is what the competition can do too. It's impossible to offer better battery life with the current battery technology. Decoding movies naturally takes too much CPU, much more than decoding music. I guess you should revisit the idea in 20 years time.

Edited 2006-09-07 20:31

I realize the thing about the screen size is the same with all PMPs, certainly I'm not faulting the archos SPECIFICALLY for that, I'm faulting all small-screened video devices, archos included.

About the battery life, I'm telling you - I own an AV700, and I'm lucky to get two full length movies out of it. Maybe if I really ran the screen at a low brightness or something I could safely do 2x2 hour movies. Or, maybe if I used a really low compression scheme so it didn't tax the processor as much.

Just because the device is "on par" with the competition, doesn't mean it doesn't suck. It just means they *all* suck, which tells me I shouldn't be purchasing such things until they stop sucking.

You are right though, we probably won't see anything good until a new energy storage medium crops up. Super caps, some of the new battery techs, etc. Hope we see a portable cold fusion device the size of a quarter soon, I'm tired of waiting on my 100" 1080p portable projector that fits in my pocket.

>I'm tired of waiting on my 100" 1080p portable projector that fits in my pocket.

I am afraid that this won't be the future...
The future is geared towards video through Bluetooth to eye-wear that can simulate large widescreen TVs. The Bluetooth consortium has already created the video profile (called GAVDP) and the first mass-market device that supports it is the Sony Ericsson K800i cellphone. Now, we are waiting for PMPs that support the GAVDP profile *and* eyewear devices that also support it. The audio/video is sent through Bluetooth 2.0+EDR from the PMP to the eyewear device and when you wear it you feel that you are in front of a huge TV or cinema. Of course, it means that you can't watch and drive, but you aren't supposed to do that with PMPs either...

Edited 2006-09-07 20:58

That's the equivilant, and it's just as good for me. That is, when they figure out how to cram 1080p worth of pixels for a 100" pseudo-display into lcds/whatever tech that fit in glasses.

I don't think that 1080p will work with current Bluetooth speeds. But if they use something as efficient as h.264 then you could have as high resolutions as 480p wirelessly with Bluetooth 2.0+EDR (on both devices, receiver and sender).
My fear is not the actual speeds and devices to achieve this transfer rate, but the fact that GAVDP might not use an efficient algorithm in terms of bitrate as let's say, as h.264 is. You see, the video is re-encoded to the GAVDP format right after it was decoded by the actual PMP (the "sender"). The key to success here is that the re-encoding must be done as efficiently as at least h.264 is, in order to fit good quality/picture-size on 100 KB/sec that Bluetooth 2.0+EDR usually maxes out at.

I personally could care less about the bluetooth. Get me a set of 1080p glasses that simulate a 100" screen, put a wire on them, and run it to my little device, and I'll be happy. You can wait for bluetooth 4.75 or something, I'll take my wired glasses now. (Fat chance, unfortunately.)

Good ideas though, and all of what you said I agree with. The tech just isn't there yet.

Make a search on google about "video glasses". There are about 5-6 such products right now. It's a new technology, and atm they only support the iPod (in terms of input). They simulate 50" screens, and they usually have either QVGA dual screens in them. Far from HDTV quality, but as we said, the tech is not there as of yet. I expect this idea to really take off in the next 2-3 years though. I wouldn't be surprised if Apple themselves offers such a product to accompany their iPods.