Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 12th Sep 2006 18:08 UTC
Apple Apple held a special event for the press today. Most of the event was about iPods; prettier colours, bigger capacities, you know the drill. For the really interesting stuff, you had to sit out the whole thing: Apple gave us a sneak peek of a product coming in 2007. In Q1 2007, Apple will release a settop box, half the size of the Mac Mini, to which you can stream content. It has a built-in power supply, USB, ethernet, 802.11 'wireless component video', optical audio, HDMI ports, and old RCA stereo audio ports. It sports a Front Row-like interface, and can be controlled using the Apple remote. Its codename is 'iTV'; a different name will be chosen. It will work with iTunes on Macs and PCs, and it will cost USD 299. Update: Eugenia and I both blogged about the product announcements. Eugenia loves the gapless playback, and I miss adherence to industry standards.
Order by: Score:

RE: Apple To Launch Settop Box
by ronaldst on Tue 12th Sep 2006 18:19 UTC
ronaldst
Member since:
2005-06-29

This I want to see.

To think MS already has a device like this (the XBox360.) Too bad MS won't make good of it. :rolleyes:

RE[2]: Apple To Launch Settop Box
by n4cer on Tue 12th Sep 2006 19:05 UTC in reply to "RE: Apple To Launch Settop Box"
n4cer Member since:
2005-07-06

To think MS already has a device like this (the XBox360.) Too bad MS won't make good of it. :rolleyes:

Could you elaborate more on the "won't make good of it" part? How is this product unlike the stand-alone Media Center extenders or (as you point out) the extender functionality of the 360?

ronaldst Member since:
2005-06-29

2 things:

IIRC that feature is only available to users with Microsoft Windows XP Media Center Edition. Home and Pro users are outta luck.

And MS doesn't hype it as a feature.

MS just shoot itself in the foot right there and then. ;)

RE[4]: Apple To Launch Settop Box
by n4cer on Tue 12th Sep 2006 19:32 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Apple To Launch Settop Box"
n4cer Member since:
2005-07-06

IIRC that feature is only available to users with Microsoft Windows XP Media Center Edition. Home and Pro users are outta luck.

While that's true for XP, it isn't for Vista. MCE will be included in 2 of the 3 SKUs available for home users (Home Premium and Ultimate).

And MS doesn't hype it as a feature.

They've hyped it both in the OEM channel (XP MCE is an OEM-only product until Vista) and as one of the main selling points for the XBOX 360 premium package, especially since the 360 was the first extender to support streaming HD content.

v RE[4]: Apple To Launch Settop Box
by tomcat on Tue 12th Sep 2006 22:32 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Apple To Launch Settop Box"
johnnytomatoe Member since:
2006-06-14

And did you know that most PC users don't EVER upgrade their machine to a newer OS? They just buy a new machine when they feel they need a new one or the one they are using just dies beyond all help.

These people may be running XP and sadly a lot of their machines will not run Vista the way Microsoft wants everyone to see it... no Aero for a lot of people out there.

Many people will probably continue running XP until its EOL comes up and even after it like people with 98. Maybe the included Media Center will push them to buy a new machine so they can actually use the full potential of their Xbox 360.... or maybe not....

RE[6]: Apple To Launch Settop Box
by tomcat on Tue 12th Sep 2006 23:38 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Apple To Launch Settop Box"
tomcat Member since:
2006-01-06

Irrelevant. XP has 80% market share. It had 0% five years ago. The fact of the matter is that Vista will have the same market share (or more) within five years, too. I daresay that the market penetration will be far greater than Apple's STB.

hobgoblin Member since:
2005-07-06

strangely, i have helped people around here move from win98 to winxp for years...

RE[4]: Apple To Launch Settop Box
by Kabal on Wed 13th Sep 2006 03:01 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Apple To Launch Settop Box"
Kabal Member since:
2005-07-09

IIRC that feature is only available to users with Microsoft Windows XP Media Center Edition. Home and Pro users are outta luck.

Windows Media Player 11 Beta on XP lets you stream video to your 360 without MCE, apparently. I'm yet to try it.

NotParker Member since:
2006-06-01

"IIRC that feature is only available to users with Microsoft Windows XP Media Center Edition. Home and Pro users are outta luck."

Windows Media Connect is free for XP users.

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=e93a0ba1-1...

And WM 11 has WMC built in.

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/devices/wmconnect/def...

MCE 2005 not needed.

Edited 2006-09-13 03:14

Burst.com
by jeanmarc on Tue 12th Sep 2006 18:23 UTC
jeanmarc
Member since:
2005-07-06

Apple infringe the Burst.com patents, they should take a licence before streaming..

http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/060105/0105456.html

RE: Burst.com
by jeanmarc on Tue 12th Sep 2006 19:33 UTC in reply to "Burst.com"
jeanmarc Member since:
2005-07-06

Thanks for mod me down but don't you think weird, than the 'iTV' allow movies and TV shows downloaded to a computer THEN play..Who said Apple need a licence ?
Burst.com is not a patent troll : http://www.businessweek.com/@@a3l1kIcQNCD69h0A/magazine/content/06_...

iTV
by BigZaphod on Tue 12th Sep 2006 18:30 UTC
BigZaphod
Member since:
2005-07-06

I've wanted one of these from Apple for years. Looking forward to it! I wonder if one will be able to stream a DVD from, say, a laptop to this thing... It'd be nice not to have to have an actual DVD player anymore. :-)

iTunes 7
by sig33kde on Tue 12th Sep 2006 18:41 UTC
sig33kde
Member since:
2006-04-04

Has anyone else jumped the gun and installed itunes 7?

... I don't like it. Waste of visual space especially with the left side bar, they arent using the standard apple widgets (scroll bars, etc) - looks almost like a java app. *shrugs* there are more things that I am not crazy about, but I was curious if anyone else had similar feelings

RE: iTunes 7
by aesiamun on Tue 12th Sep 2006 18:48 UTC in reply to "iTunes 7"
aesiamun Member since:
2005-06-29

I'm playing with it now. The left column seems like it wastes a lot more space, I agree. But that album flipping view is fantastic. I really like the way it responds, that and free album artwork downloads.

I can't help but be reminded of WMP11 with the long album list view that's included...it's slow like WMP11's too ;)

RE: iTunes 7
by parrotjoe on Tue 12th Sep 2006 20:42 UTC in reply to "iTunes 7"
parrotjoe Member since:
2005-07-06

You can change the width of the left hand column - put the curser on the right side of the scroll bar and it will change so you can make it the width you want. Also, always remember you can hide the Mini-Store by going to the View menu and choosing that.

RE: iTunes 7
by MonkeyPie on Tue 12th Sep 2006 23:03 UTC in reply to "iTunes 7"
MonkeyPie Member since:
2005-07-06

I just installed it on my Mac here... and didn't like the scroll bars at first (because it was an unexpected change I guess)... but I think that I have grown accustomed to them now and kind of prefer them this way. Of course when you say "standard" Mac widgets, remember that we are about to get a new version of OS X. This could be a hint at some of the new stuff we will be getting.

As for the width of the Source Column.... are you looking for something to complain about? Because if you are, don't complain about the size of it. If you use a screen measurement tool, you will find that the default width for the new one is actually narrower than the default for 6.0.5.

JRM7

RE[2]: iTunes 7
by ThawkTH on Wed 13th Sep 2006 00:42 UTC in reply to "RE: iTunes 7"
ThawkTH Member since:
2005-07-06

I seem to be having issues with iTunes 7... Everything plays fine etc etc unless I start doing something else that uses any real cpu/resources - browsing firefox, talking in trillian. Both things that I've ALWAYS done listening to music in iTunes. I know my 512 mb RAM and Athon XP 2000+ aren't amazing, but with a sound blaster audigy 2 and clean/function XP Pro, I'd guess it would handle things better than this....

I'll play around a bit to see if it's an issue of mine or a bug for more users. Too bad there's no iTunes bugzilla, so I can at least see what issues others are having ;)

RE: iTunes 7
by Gryzor on Wed 13th Sep 2006 12:12 UTC in reply to "iTunes 7"
Gryzor Member since:
2005-07-03

not yet.. but this is loved:

Library Backup

A new "Back Up to Disc" menu lets you easily back up your entire iTunes library to CD or DVD.

Edited 2006-09-13 12:14

Interesting but I'll pass
by Bit_Rapist on Tue 12th Sep 2006 18:56 UTC
Bit_Rapist
Member since:
2005-11-13

It looks interesting but I've got a modded xbox that basically does this and much more.

The price seems a bit steep for what you get but I'm sure it will perform quite well and will be a good addition for people who want this functionlity from apple.

Gapless playback
by Eugenia on Tue 12th Sep 2006 19:01 UTC
Eugenia
Member since:
2005-06-28

At last, gapless playback on iTunes and the 80GB iPod! Now my husband will get one (he wouldn't touch it if the iPod wouldn't support gapless playback, mostly because of "The Dark Side of the Moon").

RE: Gapless playback
by XemonerdX on Tue 12th Sep 2006 20:54 UTC in reply to "Gapless playback"
XemonerdX Member since:
2005-07-03

At last, gapless playback on iTunes and the 80GB iPod! Now my husband will get one (he wouldn't touch it if the iPod wouldn't support gapless playback, mostly because of "The Dark Side of the Moon").
Why can't he just rip it to a single mp3?

RE[2]: Gapless playback
by Nutela on Wed 13th Sep 2006 12:32 UTC in reply to "RE: Gapless playback"
Nutela Member since:
2006-02-09

Oh that's intelligent.

Looks like Jobs is following through
by jtrapp on Tue 12th Sep 2006 19:02 UTC
jtrapp
Member since:
2005-07-06

Transitioning Apple from a computer company to a media company. It took 10 years, but he appears to be pulling it off.

"If I were running Apple, I would milk the Macintosh for all it's worth -- and get busy on the next great thing...."
-- Steve Jobs, Fortune, Feb. 19, 1996

cutterjohn Member since:
2006-01-28

"Transitioning Apple from a computer company to a media company. It took 10 years, but he appears to be pulling it off."

I wouldn't say a media company, but more likely a consumer electronics company.

I am now awaiting, with baited breath, the announcement of iGameDeck (Pippin II), a 4th entrant into the console wars. (It's fun to speculate, but I seriously doubt that Apple could pull it off...)

Oh, and BTW wrt this particular announce: *YAWN* (...and it is really just a logical extension of whats that audio streaming wireless based gadget that they made several years ago... nice for the people who get all hot and bothered about generic consumer electronics though, I guess...)

I hope is records TV
by Touvan on Tue 12th Sep 2006 19:03 UTC
Touvan
Member since:
2006-09-01

From the screenshot and the price this looks like just a TV version of an iPod. If this has TiVo or DVR like capabilities, I'd be all over this. I'm not sure an iPod that hooks up to the TV is enough for me though.

iTV has no storage
by Wes Felter on Tue 12th Sep 2006 21:03 UTC in reply to "I hope is records TV"
Wes Felter Member since:
2005-11-15

All the storage and recording (EyeTV) is done on your Mac; iTV just displays stuff.

Silent media player
by Dave_K on Tue 12th Sep 2006 19:05 UTC
Dave_K
Member since:
2005-11-16

One thing that appeals about this is the lack of noise it seems to offer. I assume that this will not need a fan, and there wouldn't even be noise from a spinning disc.

The XBox360 for example is quite a noisy device, significantly louder than my PC. I wouldn't be happy with that running in my living room while I'm watching a film or listening to music.

I know a lot of people will think I'm making a fuss about nothing, but I spent quite a lot on decent AV hardware so that there wouldn't be any audible hiss or distortion. I definitely don't want to have to listen to fans and drives during quiet sections of a film or album.

Keeping the computer running in another room and using a settop box to connect it to the TV seems like a good option. With Apple making it I'd expect it to work well and be easy to use, although I wonder if it'll end up working better with Apple hardware than when connected with a PC.

It's a bit of a shame that it's only designed to work with iTunes, but that's not exactly surprising. Maybe someone will write an open source alternative that supports the iTV and isn't so resource hungry.

RE: Silent media player
by aent on Tue 12th Sep 2006 21:04 UTC in reply to "Silent media player"
aent Member since:
2006-01-25

It's a bit of a shame that it's only designed to work with iTunes, but that's not exactly surprising. Maybe someone will write an open source alternative that supports the iTV and isn't so resource hungry.

Considering probably everything that goes through it is going to be DRM'd, its going to be a battle. Whenever there is a software update, I'm sure they'll be modifying the DRM scheme again and it will always be a losing battle. Your better bet will probably end up being installing Linux on it, which I'm sure a customized distribution with something like http://www.fluendo.com/elisa">Elisa mythtv" rel="nofollow">http://www.mythtv.org">mythtv for the advanced users.

Near
by Thom_Holwerda on Tue 12th Sep 2006 19:14 UTC
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

I like the "near-DVD-quality" remarks. It's like Alfa Romeo saying their cars are "near BMW quality" ;) .

RE: Near
by Eugenia on Tue 12th Sep 2006 19:20 UTC in reply to "Near"
Eugenia Member since:
2005-06-28

A well-encoded h.264 VGA video is near-DVD quality indeed. DVDs have nigher resolution, but overall, you are going to get a similar visual experience anyway, especially if your TV is not a huge HDTV.

Interesting
by Anacardo on Tue 12th Sep 2006 19:15 UTC
Anacardo
Member since:
2005-10-30

To me the real interesting thing would be the actual complexity of the process of browsing/playing videos and other media from the iTV. IF (and it's a big if) the browsing is as seamless as it should be both on Macs and PCs, allowing you to play almost everything you want from your bed, well that could lead the unit to a very bright future. An internal HD and recording capabilities, if confirmed, would eventually transform the thing into a very succesful product. But I guess is too early to speculate onto those things. One thing that I found quite interesting is the USB 2.0 port. Sure it's probably been used to stream media from an ipod or the like but if we're lucky enough maybe we'll see something more interesting. (But everything depends on the operating system of the iTV... any clue?)
Anyway I was already planning to ditch my divx player for something more flexible, and this iThing might just be the answer. We'll see.

Edited 2006-09-12 19:18

unique device
by digitaldisaster on Tue 12th Sep 2006 19:31 UTC
digitaldisaster
Member since:
2006-01-02

Is this the unique device that Apple couldn't create with PPC that they hinted about coming in the future when they started the PPC->Intel transition at WWDC 2005 all those monthes ago?

ugh
by cchance on Tue 12th Sep 2006 19:32 UTC
cchance
Member since:
2006-02-24

this is so overhyped

the new media extenders for MCE will be smaller and they will support the xaml based extensions like the 360 and vista now support... and will allow for tv and video recording....

then we have this iTV thing that works with... iTunes... wow ... so i can purchase Apple branded movies and tv shows to watch for a fee... or i can record my own tv shows with a mediacenter and then watch them for free.

RE: ugh
by digitaldisaster on Tue 12th Sep 2006 20:27 UTC in reply to "ugh"
digitaldisaster Member since:
2006-01-02

It will almost certainly be able to play at least quicktime and mpeg2/4 files. What makes you think otherwise?
If it can't play your vaourite format then just have a machine transcode it on the fly like I do for my Haupage MediaMVP. Apple even has the software to do this in Darwin/Quicktime streaming server.

huh
by cchance on Tue 12th Sep 2006 19:34 UTC
cchance
Member since:
2006-02-24

the main selling point for the premium 360?

The extender is in the cheap core package and the premium package of the 360 it makes no difference and it supports full HD streaming support

RE: huh
by n4cer on Tue 12th Sep 2006 19:51 UTC in reply to "huh"
n4cer Member since:
2005-07-06

the main selling point for the premium 360?The extender is in the cheap core package and the premium package of the 360 it makes no difference and it supports full HD streaming support

One of -- the premium package included the remote. Though you're right that the extender functionality also existed in the core. If you were using it strictly as an extender, the core was the better buy. If you were using it both for gaming and media, the premium was cheaper than buying the remote, harddrive, woreless controller, etc., seperately.

$300!?!?!
by mike hess on Tue 12th Sep 2006 19:47 UTC
mike hess
Member since:
2005-08-22

I can't believe they are charging $300 for that.

I'm doing all the same stuff right now using Xbox Media Center for < $100. And that even does HD video. Granted, this hardware will be able to support HD, but 640x480 on itunes Movies really doesn't cut it.

And in my opinion, XBMC's interface is prettier:
http://www.chokemaniac.net/gfx/gallery/pm3_screenshots/screenshots0...

RE: $300!?!?!
by thavith_osn on Tue 12th Sep 2006 19:53 UTC in reply to "$300!?!?!"
thavith_osn Member since:
2005-07-11

That's a matter of opinion... The screen shot you linked to looks very ordinary to me, but again, that's just my opinion :-) I do like MC's l&f though...

I think it's great Apple is doing this... 1, it's not a secret up to the launch date, they've given us a bit of a preview, and 2, it really does give us more of an idea where Apple is headed...

Cool...

premium
by cchance on Tue 12th Sep 2006 20:31 UTC
cchance
Member since:
2006-02-24

LOL no the premium 360 doesn't include a remote... the first few thousand that MS sold got a special edition remote control... it doesnt anymore, though the extender works fine with the wireless gamepad ;)

RE: premium
by n4cer on Tue 12th Sep 2006 23:17 UTC in reply to "premium"
n4cer Member since:
2005-07-06

LOL no the premium 360 doesn't include a remote... the first few thousand that MS sold got a special edition remote control... it doesnt anymore, though the extender works fine with the wireless gamepad ;)

The Premium packages were those few thousand that included the remote. There is no longer a premium package from Microsoft (though retailers use the term "premium" for some of their bundles). The current packages from Microsoft are simply XBOX 360 and XBOX 360 Core.

itunes
by SK8T on Tue 12th Sep 2006 20:31 UTC
SK8T
Member since:
2006-06-01

maybe offtopic:

I've never seen such a ugly programm than iTunes! This iTunes is the worst iTunes ever!

steve haven't you seen that before you released that!?

v The sound of Steve Jobs begging
by NotParker on Tue 12th Sep 2006 20:31 UTC
atomicplayboy Member since:
2006-04-28

There's a big difference between music you listen to on your device of choice, and the music that annoys everyone around you everytime you recieve a call. For some inextricable reason, ringtones are a huge market (not to mention expensive) and probably make up the majority of that "digital music" sold in 2005. Would you make a playlist and listen to those ringtones with headphones? Absolutly not. In my opionion, including ringtones in that stat pretty much null and voids it.

mallard Member since:
2006-01-06

> The decline of iPod sales continued in the second quarter, while sales
> of music-enabled mobile phones soared."

People are just buying/replacing their phones and virtually all models on the market are "music-enabled". People are not buying a phone as a music device, but it might just persuade them not to buy a cheap mp3 player if their phone already has the functionality.

Less people are buying new iPods because the market is close to saturated. Almost eveybody who wants one has one. Apple really isn't doing much to compel an upgrade.

>the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry said that
>half of all digital music sold in 2005 went directly to mobile phones
>(including ringtones).

If you include ringtones, then you basically make the statistics useless.
Most people don't consider ringtones to be "music" (although they are musical) they certianly don't buy them to listen to.
Ringtone sales do not cut into music sales.

Me: I own a Nokia N70 that can play MP3, WMV, OGG, WAV, PCM, MID, etc and a 4GB iPod Mini. My phone has exactly one MP3, my ringtone (which I did not pay for).
My iPod has approx. 50 iTMS tracks and approx. 200 track from CD. (I have a small music collection).
The camera on my phone was a factor in its purchase. Music support was not.
I bought the iPod after a series of cheap flash-based MP3 players that I found user-unfriendly and limited.

Content
by whartung on Tue 12th Sep 2006 20:47 UTC
whartung
Member since:
2005-07-06

If I could rip DVDs like I rip CDs in to iTunes, I'd grab the iTV in a hot second.

If I could buy shows on a schedule, and I could get everything I wanted (specifically motorcycle racing content), I'd drop DirecTV in a hot second, and buy this iTV thing.

But the beauty now is simply that Apple is getting the impetus going to get more and more content online.

RE: Content
by Kroc on Tue 12th Sep 2006 21:26 UTC in reply to "Content"
Kroc Member since:
2005-11-10

I use handbrake to rip my DVDs into MP4s that iTunes (and my iPod) plays fine. If it's in your iTunes library, then iTV will play it fine.

RE[2]: Content
by tryphcycle on Wed 13th Sep 2006 15:56 UTC in reply to "RE: Content"
tryphcycle Member since:
2006-02-16

>>>>>I use handbrake to rip my DVDs into MP4s that iTunes (and my iPod) plays fine. If it's in your iTunes library, then iTV will play it fine.>>>>>

exactly...

i think most of the non apple crowd are missing this point, COMPLETELY... much like the Fair Play DRM controversy.... iTunes works wonderfully with nonDRMed content... and so will "iTV". the reality is apple is NOT locking any one down with their DRM.... cus you choose to buy content from the ITunes store. you are not FORCED to! they do lock you our of WMV content... ( or does MS do that?)

as long as open apps like Handbreak are available... you can use iTunes, iPod... and iTV (and of cource your Macintosh) and have all the audio, and video content you ever could want... and NEVER have a single piece of DRMed content on you system.... (not to mention WMV garbage!!!)

in summry... the "iPod universe is pretty damn "OPEN" to me!

i am sure others will dissagree.... but so what!

RE[3]: Content
by alcibiades on Thu 14th Sep 2006 10:33 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Content"
alcibiades Member since:
2005-10-12

The real issue is Apple's behaviour and what it shows.

1) We had the Harmony case. Apple revised the iPod firmware to make it impossible to play music bought on another online store.

2) We had the PyMusique case. Apple changed iTunes to make it impossible to buy from the store using non-Apple software.

3) We have the French DRM case. Apple will not license the DRM to make it possible to play iTunes bought music on other players.

All in all this is not an open system. No matter what hacks you can do, the aim of the company as revealed in its behaviour is to force you to buy linked products. It is in short exactly the approach that MS has taken with Windows, which in another context the Apple enthusiasts complain so bitterly about.

This is why emusic is a better store, and why iRiver is a better player. Though emusic too seems to use proprietary download software, and who knows what it really does? But it is more open and better than iTunes.

Mark Williamson
Member since:
2005-07-06

ITV is the name of a TV station in the UK - I'm sure Apple are aware of this. So I imagine it's pretty certain they'll want a new name!

parrotjoe Member since:
2005-07-06

Yes, in fact Jobs said "iTV" is probably a temporary name for it.

tristan Member since:
2006-02-01

ITV is the name of a TV station in the UK - I'm sure Apple are aware of this. So I imagine it's pretty certain they'll want a new name!

Ah, but at least this way you'll be able to say "I like to watch iTV" without having to be embarrassed about it...

(With apologies to all the non-Brits reading who have no idea what we're talking about!)

Flatland_Spider Member since:
2006-09-01

My guesses for the new name are iVision or AppleVision.

Too Expensive...
by bigcraig03 on Tue 12th Sep 2006 21:57 UTC
bigcraig03
Member since:
2006-04-07

Yeah it may be cool and it may have Front Row but $299 for this kind of device is alittle high. The DSM-520 is $249 play movies from CinemaNow, Movielink and Amazon meaning Windows Media Video and it's Hi-Def too. I think D-Link may drop the price for the Holidays... Apple doesn't drop prices too often comparibly.

It can stream Rentals and Buys, that's the difference.

Edited 2006-09-12 21:59

RE: Too Expensive...
by jonsmirl on Tue 12th Sep 2006 22:11 UTC in reply to "Too Expensive..."
jonsmirl Member since:
2005-07-06

I agree, basically a DSM-520. Apple's will probably use proprietary protocols instead of the standard UPNP AV. That means it won't interoperate with anything except Apple products.

The latest version of MythTV (v20) is supposed to support the 520. I haven't tried it yet. Should be great when combined with Firewire HD capture from the cable box.

Adurbe
Member since:
2005-07-06

not 802.11b or g, just 802.11

I wonder if this indicates a 802.11n upgrade b4 the first quater of 2007 (lauch of the iTV)

Airport 'Slightly More' Extreme!!

Maybe somebody can help me out here ...
by WorknMan on Wed 13th Sep 2006 01:15 UTC
WorknMan
Member since:
2005-11-13

So I buy shome movies/TV shows from iTunes, and instead of just being able to burn them to DVD, now I gotta buy a $300 settop box from Apple just to watch the f**king things on my big screen TV? Somebody please tell me how I benefit from this deal.

Arun Member since:
2005-07-07

now I gotta buy a $300 settop box from Apple just to watch the f**king things on my big screen TV? Somebody please tell me how I benefit from this deal.

My best guess is that is the only way Apple can please the MPAA and sell movies from itunes. With the set top box there is still only one copy of the orginal media which is being accessed. If you burn a DVD you have two copies, which is a serious No No for the greedy MPAA.

I think the iTV is a reactionary apporach from Apple rather than a let's make more money selling boxes scheme. Remember it costs millions to build and market a product like the iTV. I would think Apple might find it easier to allow DVD burning.

And the pre-annoucement of a prototype product from Apple says " We know there is this gapping hole in our media strategy but we are working on it.". Something Apple is not known to do.

I'm Suprised...
by bigcraig03 on Wed 13th Sep 2006 01:17 UTC
bigcraig03
Member since:
2006-04-07

It's taken Apple this long to reveal a Media Extender client. I mean they've been out on the market for quite some time in general from Linksys to D-Link to Buffalo. I'm glad Apple is finally going to release the iTV. Know why? Because then that will encourage all the other companies to further invest in Windows Media DRM A/V based media extenders and thus flood the market, with probably cheaper versions or cut prices on existing devices. Apple didn't do the Media Center or media extender first, but they do help drive the market for the Win/PC side of things.

I'm kinda suprised there was no option to purchase/buy a/v content from within the iTV with a click of the button. Aswell as an update to Front Row for such capabilities. Maybe even a Windows version of Front Row?

RE: I'm Suprised...
by tryphcycle on Wed 13th Sep 2006 15:47 UTC in reply to "I'm Suprised..."
tryphcycle Member since:
2006-02-16

yea... sort-a like what they did for the MP3 player market, huh...? lucky for creative and samsung that apple came to market with the iPod... cus apple has really driven sales of the Win/PC (WMV and non iPod devices) side of things!!!


>>>>I'm kinda suprised there was no option to purchase/buy a/v content from within the iTV with a click of the button. Aswell as an update to Front Row for such capabilities. Maybe even a Windows version of Front Row?<<<<<<

i am pretty sure, Jobs just dabbled on the capibilities of this device of the future...

Gappless plyabck
by collywolly on Wed 13th Sep 2006 11:50 UTC
collywolly
Member since:
2006-06-19

Wow, you Apple fans will rant about anything. I mean is gapless playback not a fairly basic feature?

Amarok has had it for a while now (dunno how long, 'cos I did't find it that big of a deal).

Mark Williamson
Member since:
2005-07-06

I just had a (hopefully not prescient) vision of some sort of Microsoft set top box: "Hello! It looks like you're trying to watch X Factor Omnibus! Would you like some help?"

Windows Media Center - shudder
by Sabon on Wed 13th Sep 2006 15:38 UTC
Sabon
Member since:
2005-07-06

I've got TiVo and my wife's sister and her husband have Windows Media Center. There is absolutely no way I'm changing to Media Center.

Apple's iTV (or whatever it is going to be called). What it does is wirelessly or over the wire plays things out of iTunes off a Windows or Mac. It has no hard drive from what I can tell. This is ok if everything you have is already stored in iTunes on your computer and you aren't interested in live TV.

iTunes/iTV and Media Center = 3 out of 10
TiVo = 9.7 out of 10
Not even close.

iTunes - The ability to combine tracks into one "song" so you don't have gaps between songs or tracks that are expected to be like one song has been in iTunes for at least the last three years. This was super easy to do and I did this with all my songs that were supposed to be gapless. In the meantime, the woman whos husband didn't buy an iPod before just because of this ... sure missed out on listening to a lot of other great music on a very user friendly device.