Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 19th Sep 2006 09:25 UTC
Linux "While other articles seem to discuss the impact of this drastic change for some older Windows users, here we are going to discuss how those newbies looking to Linux can tell you if are truly ready for Linux, and which Linux distro would be the logical and best choice for their own needs and/or tastes. More here.
Order by: Score:
Win98 & ME .... Puppy
by noip on Tue 19th Sep 2006 11:23 UTC
noip
Member since:
2006-08-16

The linked article talks of options available for dis-enfranchised Win98 and ME users, yet discusses distros that are (mostly) more akin to WinXP.

I'd suggest that Puppy would be a better first step for such users and their hardware. DSL, whilst excellent, is just that bit different to what a Windows user would be familiar with. (although they could be beaten into submission pretty quickly) ...

Sort of like moving from beer to wine ... little steps. And before you know it, you are a Slackware / Debian / Gentoo evangelist. ;)

N

Reply Score: 2

RE: Win98 & ME .... Puppy
by poiurewq on Tue 19th Sep 2006 13:48 UTC in reply to "Win98 & ME .... Puppy"
poiurewq Member since:
2006-09-19

Puppy Linux runs really fast because it loads into RAM.
Recent versions install to hard drive easily and boot-up time is quick. I replaced ME with Puppy on a 400 Mhz 128 Mb RAM machine so I could take video guitar lessons with Gxine.

Reply Score: 1

RE[2]: Win98 & ME .... Puppy
by rcsteiner on Tue 19th Sep 2006 17:24 UTC in reply to "RE: Win98 & ME .... Puppy"
rcsteiner Member since:
2005-07-12

Yup, Puppy is very fast, and it's also quite nice from a Windows user perspective because it identifies programs on the desktop by generic names which are less likely to confuse a new user.

Here's a picture of Puppy 2.01 running on my XP desktop using QEMU:

http://www.visi.com/~rsteiner/puppy-qemu.jpg

Torsmo and MC are my own additions (they aren't on the default installation).

Edited 2006-09-19 17:25

Reply Score: 2

depends
by netpython on Tue 19th Sep 2006 12:08 UTC
netpython
Member since:
2005-07-06

It all depends on the persons learning capabilities and willingness to learn.

Reply Score: 2

Re:Win98 & ME .... Puppy
by helf on Tue 19th Sep 2006 13:12 UTC
helf
Member since:
2005-07-06

I've used linux for years and puppy is still one of my favorite distributions ;) probably because I'm too cheap/poor to upgrade my hardware and it runs fantastically with minimum effort on my lowend machines. (think p233mmx overclocked with 128-256mb of ram)

Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows NT Windows CE)

Reply Score: 1

v Seriously...
by cozby on Tue 19th Sep 2006 13:32 UTC
v RE: Seriously...
by eggman on Tue 19th Sep 2006 13:41 UTC in reply to "Seriously..."
desktop linux?
by opkool on Tue 19th Sep 2006 15:08 UTC
opkool
Member since:
2006-02-13

This article is uncomplete, as Mandriva is left out of the review. And Mandriva is probably the first Linux distro that was aimed to the desktop!

It's like talking about server Linux and leaving out RHEL and RHEL-clones.

Peace

Reply Score: 2

rcsteiner
Member since:
2005-07-12

...even though later versions of DSL provide both apt-get and synaptic as a MyDSL package, which opens up over 8000 debian applications to a DSL user.

DSL *is* intended for power users. It just has a different goal in terms of initial installation size, but one can expand the system considerably from that point.

Reply Score: 1