Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Oct 2006 14:19 UTC, submitted by MaxxTotal
Hardware, Embedded Systems Sun Microsystems and Fujitsu engineers on Tuesday promised significant performance increases with two next-generation chips, models that they hope will help keep the Sparc line relevant. Company representatives speaking at the Fall Processor Forum promised significant gains over the chips' predecessors - the first Niagara (now called UltraSparc T1) and the single-core Sparc64 V.
Order by: Score:
Good news
by !dev!null on Wed 11th Oct 2006 15:37 UTC
!dev!null
Member since:
2006-06-18

At least they didn't killed the sparc line as originaly announced. I'm gland that there still exist non x86 architetures, so I can still build stronger Fw machines.

Ludo
--
http://perso.hirlimann.net/~ludo/blog/

Reply Score: 1

How do Fujitsu's chips compare to Sun's?
by kiz01 on Wed 11th Oct 2006 17:19 UTC
kiz01
Member since:
2005-07-06

They made some nice comparisons about how the Sparc64 VI is a huge improvement over the Sparc64 V but how does it compare to the UltraSparc IV+? I work in a shop that has UltraSparc servers and I would like to know what kind of performance boost the new generation of chips will give me.

On a related note, I SO want to play with the Niagra II chips. Eight threads per core, 5x increase on floating point, 1.4x increase on integer, etc. What's not to like?

Reply Score: 2

rayiner Member since:
2005-07-06

Sparc64 leaves UltraSPARC in the dust. They are true OOO cores with both better IPC and higher clockspeed than Sun's UltraSPARC chips.

I don't know whether the system interconnect is any good, though.

Reply Score: 1

kaiwai Member since:
2005-07-06

Well, the TPC benchmarks demonstrate its performance pretty good - one assumes that database benchmarks are going to be bandwidth and latency sensitive.

I'd say that Sun will be using their own interconnect, with the SPARC VI sitting ontop; its their CPU that is crap, not the processor itself.

Edit: Mind you, IIRC, Sun is a member of Hypertransport consortium, so I'm assuming that when Hypertransport surpasses Suns own technology, they're going to use it - IIRC, Hypertransport 3.0 looks *really* good on paper, that would be a great combo; SPARC IV + Hypertransport 3.0.

Edited 2006-10-12 07:47

Reply Score: 1

drdoug Member since:
2006-04-30

I'd say that Sun will be using their own interconnect, with the SPARC VI sitting ontop; its their CPU that is crap, not the processor itself.

I thought both Sun and Fujitsu will co-marketing the Sparc64 VI in the APL systems developed by Fujitsu. The only difference probably will be the badges and possibly the colour of the plastic.

Reply Score: 1

Niagra II
by ormandj on Wed 11th Oct 2006 18:03 UTC
ormandj
Member since:
2005-10-09

I've been waiting for Niagra II, I love the original but with the advent of the second version, I don't believe I'll need to maintain a single x86 machine!

I am really liking the direction Sun has been heading and continues to move towards. If they keep this up, the company may yet have it's day in the "Sun" again. ;)

Reply Score: 2