Post a Comment
I then wonder why they are trying to allow software patents via the EPLA...
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/79377
It's german only, sorry.
The parliament clearly rejected the previous vote on software patents with something like a 700 to 50 votes, so don't spread this misinformation, they know about the subject. But, frankly, I was positively surprised myself back when I heard the result of the vote.
And also, the parliament is the most democratic part of the EU. The members are elected directly by the people in the countries, contrary to the Council (the ministers of each country) and Commission (elected by the parliament, but chosen by the national governments).
Edited 2006-10-12 19:45
Microsoft may be a moneymaker as an American tax payer, it is much less to European countries. Some clever people in the EU elite have seen that open source is an opportunity for European software makers. Mandriva, Suse, for example, started out as European firms.
Europe wants to be a little more competitive in hi-tech and as it's hard to beat the giant in its own proprietary field, it now stimulates the public sector to use open source, hoping it will stimulate innovation in the European software/IT sector in turn. A sort of software Keynesianism so to speak.
Unfortunately, the quality of (esp. 'beta') education, and the investments in it, in Europe leave much to be desired.
One notable exception is Finland. Guess which OSS figure comes from there. 




