OSNews

you don't have to keep up to date more than 300 pcs, do you?

i want SP3 NOW.

Edited 2006-10-20 13:12

No, lucky me

But look at it this way - it means you have a high level of job security

"with SP3 arriving three years later, the update will focus security patches and bug fixes rather than feature enhancements"

I thought Windows XP SP-3 was finally shipping this coming November? They're calling it Vista, or something like that, and charging from $199.00 to $300.00 for it.

The horse is dead, please stop flogging it; I know you're part of the 'anti-Microsoft-no-matter-what-they-do' crew please allow the adults in the forum appreciate being able to run an operating system and having access to such 'useless' (by Linux fanboy definition) of such things are Adobe Creative Suite, Microsoft Office, and being able to use hardware without stuffing around with bits and pieces of the OS.

The horse is dead, please stop flogging it; I know you're part of the 'anti-Linux-no-matter-what-the-community-do' crew please allow the adults in the forum appreciate being able to run an operating system and having access to such 'useless' (by MS fanboy definition) of such things are Adobe Creative Suite, Microsoft Office, (yeah, they run under Wine) and being able to use hardware without stuffing around with bits and pieces of the OS, because the motherboard is somehow incompatible with XP and don't have any new drivers.

Now, kaiwai, please stop your trolling. You are no better than NotParker, and that's terrible.

You ought to know better. I'm disappointed in you.

Now, kaiwai, please stop your trolling. You are no better than NotParker, and that's terrible.

So you think his post is a troll and you respond with a search-and-replaced version of it. What, precisely, does that make your post? I'll give you a hint, it rhymes with "droll."

I usually hold you in high regard due to bedoper.com, but if you keep attacking me like that, I won't for sure.

kaiwai was way out of line, and I mimicked him to show how much out of line he was.

How hard is that to cope?

I usually hold you in high regard due to bedoper.com, but if you keep attacking me like that, I won't for sure.

"attacking" you? You may want to grow a thicker skin, or discard the persecution complex, if you plan to keep participating in this whole "internet" thing.

kaiwai was way out of line, and I mimicked him to show how much out of line he was.

Out of line? Because he pointed out the lack of originality in one of the trite one-liners that gets repeated every single time there's a Vista thread here? Riiiiight.

How hard is that to cope?

Uh... what is that sentence supposed to mean?

Saying that wouldn't be original if you would have immitated one of the thousands telling that joke before but it even has been told in this very thread before.

Please, if you insist on beeing a troll and flaming around, at least try to say something yourself instead of just over and over repeating others.

And this comes from an linux user.

//And this comes from an linux user.//

Obviously, considering your grammar.

English is not my native language, but i guess someone as educated as you doesn't even know that other languages exist.

English is not my native language,

That is such a tired excuse. I freely admit to not being fluent in French or German or Gaelic or whatever, but I still have the sense to actually realize that I'm not capable of expressing myself in those languages - along with enough sense not to try to participate in forums that where those languages are dominant.

ha! I was going to say that then refrained from it

Why? What pressing issues with Xp is SP3 supposed to solve?
Your avarage Joe User never even heard of SP3.

Average Joe doesn't even grok firewalls or antivirus. What Average Joe haven't heard of is pretty much irrelevant.

And that is exactly the point. Pushing back XP-SP3 to a later release isn't going to affect mass market choices, because mass market doesn't know the first thing about it.

Why switch to Apple? I'd gain nothing from doing that. The tactics of Apple are no better than those of Microsoft.

They may have been too busy with Vista and Office 2003 to have focused on WinXP SP3, I see no ploy here, just a really messed up development schedule for Vista and Office. Not everything MS does is a conspiracy

For some reason, I'm suddenly reminded of an old quote on the fallacy of assuming conspiracy when incompetence is a much more plausible explanation.

I have to admit I seriously doubt the legality of TinyWindows2003. To me it appears to be most illegal.

Thom, you might want to take a closer look at it.

I am sure that iso's aren't illegal, and you still need a valid windows license. Burning and copying windows cd's is common practice in the IT business. You don't pay for the cd, you pay for the cd key.

Considering the contents of the "release info", I'm not sure it could be considered legal. Definitely not in Denmark. Distribution is usually a right reserved by the copyright holder, unless the license specifically allows you to distribute the product.

However, distributing patches to turn a normal Windows 2003 Server into a TineWindows2003 would be legal. But not otherwise.

And a automatic Product Key Changer doesn't seem that legal to me.

"I am sure that iso's aren't illegal, and you still need a valid windows license."

Sorry but you're completely wrong. That is warez, that's not legal. Making isos of commercial products available for download most certainly is illegal, not to mention that the readme file on that page says "No 'Product Key' is needed". It's a hacked up VLK version from the sounds of it. Also if you go up a directory that site is full of warez and cracks. I am surprised that OSNews would allow links to illegal software to remain on this board.

Edited 2006-10-20 04:44

I agree with you. It has a very illegal warez-like taste.

Especially that automatic Product Key changer... sounds most illegal to me.

i put my key (that i never used), i paid full price for it.

I think it's been made with Bart PE builder:P

Will tinywindows boot from a CD, like knoppix?

The fact XP is from 2001 doesn't really matter since it's been upgraded constantly since then.

The differences between XP and Win2K are so small it could have been released as a SP to Win2K.

Using old releases are a non-issue as long as you apply the proper security fixes and bugfixes.

Someplaces WERE still running win3.11 machines in 2000, it's crazy but true, which would be the equvalent, and lots of places are still running Windows 2000, which came out 7 years ago, and there are still places running NT, and that came out in 1996 (10 years ago), so your statement makes no sense. I also ran into quite a few customers who ran Windows 98 when I worked for an ISP, and I just left there 2 months ago. People run what they need to run, and what they are comfortable with.

Windows 2000 is great. It's NT, it doesn't have the Internet Exploiter engine as tightly integrated (meaning it's easier to remove) and best of all it's very lightweight, especially as compared to XP. The only reason I don't still use it is due to Microsoft's decision to not add cleartype to it in the none-existing Service Pack 5. Otherwise I could live without many of XP's "features" and stick with what works best....

--bornagainpenguin

It's a true story, and that's why people don't upgrade, they find what they like, and stick with it. I certainly won't be going to vista for a very long time, if ever, but I am not Vista's target market, either.