Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 11th Dec 2006 23:03 UTC
Mac OS X Apple website Apple Gazette is reporting rumouring that Leopard will come with an all-new interface, supposedly with lots of black glossy things (similar to Vista, indeed): "Apple Gazette has received a tip from an apple insider that the Mac OS Aqua User Interface will be replaced with a new UI named Illuminous. The source goes on to say that we will see a demonstration of Illuminous at Macworld 2007." I have never heard of this website, so I cannot make an assessment of its reliability, but suffices to say that it is highly debatable. Interesting nonetheless. Update: More info.
Order by: Score:

Cupertino, start your photocopiers
by chocobanana on Mon 11th Dec 2006 23:18 UTC
chocobanana
Member since:
2006-01-04

Well, we haven't seen anything yet, but I hope that Jobs doesn't go against his commentary against Microsoft.

Anyway, it's good to know that the UI skin is going to change, it has been present for a good time. I hope they keep Aqua as an option though, it is in my opinion really one of the best skins ever devised for desktop computing.

Edited 2006-12-11 23:18

That would not be very surprising..
by NicolasRoard on Mon 11th Dec 2006 23:22 UTC
NicolasRoard
Member since:
2005-07-16

Frankly, considering that the current developer release doesn't sport a new UI, I think I'm not alone to have thought during the last keynote that they were preparing a completely different UI, but were hiding it until the final release next year (and vista would be a good enough reason to do so...)

After all, they did exactly the same thing with rhapsody -- the API were the same than OSX, but the UI profoundly changed (aqua).

Perhaps we'll simply have a slightly more refined UI theme with "dark gloss" as previously reported, but I would more expect something really different, not just a new theme. (and hopefully they'll trash the finder while they are here)

Tuishimi Member since:
2005-07-06

If they refactor the Finder I for one will be supremely pleased.

zbrimhall Member since:
2006-08-21

Your argument doen't make sense. You suggest that the absence of changes to the UI indicate that...there will be changes to the UI. How is the absence of a thing evidence for its presence? And is the inverse true? If there WERE changes to the UI in the developer seeds, would that be evidence that the UI will be staying the same when 10.5 ships? You know, change things up in the previews to mess with the copycats in Redmond, and then leave everything the same in the final product.

Late in the game?
by Adam S on Mon 11th Dec 2006 23:27 UTC
Adam S
Member since:
2005-04-01

Isn't it a little late in the game for a completely file manager redesign?

I would love to see some major changes to the Mac OS UI just to keep things fresh, but I don't think Aqua is tired yet, I think we need two things:

1. Consistency (love Uno!)
2. Many long overdue Finder features

Not unexpected
by eivind on Mon 11th Dec 2006 23:28 UTC
eivind
Member since:
2005-11-09

The Aqua interface has been around for a while. When it came, it was revolutionary, and over the last few years it has gone through necessary revisions.

I am not surprised that Apple wants to leap ahead Windows Vista and present us with the next generation GUI at this time. It only seems logical. This is good news for future competition!

Somehow Apple seems to always be one step (or five) ahead of Microsoft in the usability department.

RE: Not unexpected
by twenex on Mon 11th Dec 2006 23:35 UTC in reply to "Not unexpected"
twenex Member since:
2006-04-21


Somehow Apple seems to always be one step (or five) ahead of Microsoft in the usability department.

Apparently not in the design department, though - I mean, Vista's black, so OS X should have been black three years ago!

RE[2]: Not unexpected
by rferrel on Mon 11th Dec 2006 23:41 UTC in reply to "RE: Not unexpected"
rferrel Member since:
2006-03-21

vista has the look of the apple dashboard widgets so YES they are always ahead

RE[3]: Not unexpected
by helio9000 on Tue 12th Dec 2006 03:04 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Not unexpected"
helio9000 Member since:
2006-05-24

And Apple had the look of Konfabulator widgets and those were similar to...oh christ...don't this arguments ever get old? Anyone who has used more than one OS over a number of years can see that they have all influenced one another. And what they didn't get from each other...they took from BeOS!

RE[4]: Not unexpected
by dylansmrjones on Tue 12th Dec 2006 07:58 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Not unexpected"
dylansmrjones Member since:
2005-10-02

And BeOS took it from NexTSTEP and AmigaOS and OS/2 and Mac OS Classic which again took it from earlier systems, incl. DOS-based systems and from elements in applications for the Apple II.

### BEGIN IRONY ###
Oh dear, it's a rotten industry.. they are all "stealing" from each other.
### END IRONY ###

RE[5]: Not unexpected
by twenex on Tue 12th Dec 2006 11:30 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Not unexpected"
twenex Member since:
2006-04-21

And Windows stole the taskbar from RiscOS's iconbar, and...

Edited 2006-12-12 11:31

RE[6]: Not unexpected
by dylansmrjones on Tue 12th Dec 2006 11:48 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Not unexpected"
dylansmrjones Member since:
2005-10-02

And perhaps RiscOS stole it from Windows. Windows 1.0x actually had a taskbar-thingy ;)

RE[2]: Not unexpected
by eivind on Mon 11th Dec 2006 23:42 UTC in reply to "RE: Not unexpected"
eivind Member since:
2005-11-09

Apparently not in the design department, though - I mean, Vista's black, so OS X should have been black three years ago!

That's not right... Black iPods, black MacBooks, now black GUI. It seems that black is the new white.

Colors aside, there's no doubt that the major GUI changes would be more than a re-skin. Anything else seems silly. My guess is - even sleeker, even easier to use and sexier than ever. It will be a Vista killer.

RE[3]: Not unexpected
by Wintermute on Tue 12th Dec 2006 03:05 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Not unexpected"
Wintermute Member since:
2005-07-30

It will be a Vista killer.

You're wrong on that one. People still have to make a conscious decision to buy (and spend extra $$$) a Mac. Vista will be comping pre-installed in the vast majority of PC out there...

RE[4]: Not unexpected
by tyrione on Tue 12th Dec 2006 03:15 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Not unexpected"
tyrione Member since:
2005-11-21

Vista will be comping pre-installed in the vast majority of PC out there...

This is purely speculative and harkens to the days that ``No one got fired for buying IBM.'' Vista requirements are definitely demanding and when the Enterprise markets are holding off; and the DirectX 10 cards being on the highend you won't see it in the standard configuration without the OEM Vendor making some disclaimers about the Vista experience being limited.

RE[3]: Not unexpected
by t4inted on Tue 12th Dec 2006 09:16 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Not unexpected"
t4inted Member since:
2006-11-24

Mac OS X already is the Vista Killer. People just don't know yet.

RE: Not unexpected
by helf on Tue 12th Dec 2006 04:15 UTC in reply to "Not unexpected"
helf Member since:
2005-07-06

"When it came, it was revolutionary..."

How the heck was it revolutionary? I mean, honestly, how? It was an updated 'Mac' interface. With technologies from NEXTSTEP and some new stuff.

RE[2]: Not unexpected
by Wowbagger on Tue 12th Dec 2006 08:42 UTC in reply to "RE: Not unexpected"
Wowbagger Member since:
2005-07-06

Considering the big slump in UI developement, probably that already counts as revolutionary?

RE: Not unexpected
by BluenoseJake on Tue 12th Dec 2006 13:27 UTC in reply to "Not unexpected"
BluenoseJake Member since:
2005-08-11

"I am not surprised that Apple wants to leap ahead Windows Vista and present us with the next generation GUI at this time. It only seems logical. This is good news for future competition!"

If the rumours are true, that means they are staying ahead of MS by copying MS, seems pretty hypocritical, considering Jobs' remarks about photocopiers at redmond

Huh?
by Xaero_Vincent on Mon 11th Dec 2006 23:54 UTC
Xaero_Vincent
Member since:
2006-08-18

Well Apple's preview of Leopard on their website certainly doesn't indicate any drastic changes.

I somehow doubt Apple wants to throw in a whole new interface and set of bugs midway through beta stage.

I do, however, agree that the Aqua interface is aging. It was cool in 2001 but now shiny, gradient icons and widgets are pretty standard on GNU/Linux and Windows Vista.

Illuminous?
by stooovie on Tue 12th Dec 2006 00:01 UTC
stooovie
Member since:
2006-01-25

The name Illuminous suggest light shining spilling from a (dark) glass surface, which is exactly what Aero is about. Vista is Light pulsating from Dark, which is quite fresh. Hope to see Apple add some twist to this idea.. And, darker colors are easier for eyes.

RE: Illuminous?
by Sphinx on Tue 12th Dec 2006 14:41 UTC in reply to "Illuminous?"
Sphinx Member since:
2005-07-09

What a load of crap, not even a stinking word. Darkness also means eye strain.

So what
by Angel Blue01 on Tue 12th Dec 2006 00:02 UTC
Angel Blue01
Member since:
2006-11-01

I just hope they have more color schemes.

I hate black
by A30Guy on Tue 12th Dec 2006 00:05 UTC
A30Guy
Member since:
2005-07-06

I can think of nothing worse than looking at a black-themed GUI. Depressing. Vista's taskbar looks like it was designed by a Goth committee!

RE: I hate black
by orestes on Tue 12th Dec 2006 01:26 UTC in reply to "I hate black"
orestes Member since:
2005-07-06

I can think of something far worse.
The abomination called Luna.

apple copying ms
by Adurbe on Tue 12th Dec 2006 00:07 UTC
Adurbe
Member since:
2005-07-06

seems a shame if its just a copy... I would far prefer something NEW esp if they want me to pay for this upgrade (which they will)

innovate not imitate as they say

Doubtful
by Phloptical on Tue 12th Dec 2006 00:17 UTC
Phloptical
Member since:
2006-10-10

I doubt Apple will stoop to Microsoft's level when it comes to style ideas on any product, let alone their OS, so I'm going to have to go ahead and call BS on the websites prediction. Their (Apple's) whole business model is built on the fact that they know how to bring the "cool" to their hardware such that it will entice people to pay the premium for it. Microsoft is anything but "cool".

I would also believe that the new UI should come in OS XI (11, for all you non-roman numeral types), not an update of OS X. Plus, IMO, the whole "black UI theme" is just garbage....glossy or not, it's just plain dark and depressing. That's great if you like The Cure, but sucks if you have to stare at it day in and day out. At least Vista has the ability to change the color option to other colors.

RE: Doubtful
by ronaldst on Tue 12th Dec 2006 01:00 UTC in reply to "Doubtful"
ronaldst Member since:
2005-06-29

@Phloptical

I doubt Apple will stoop to Microsoft's level when it comes to style ideas on any product.

Apple steals ideas all the time. The Finder is almost the same as XP's Open/Save dialog windows. Even the GNOME and KDE folks have implemented the very concept into their respectives DEs.

Only Apple makes it a big deal out of it (elitism).

RE[2]: Doubtful
by rayiner on Tue 12th Dec 2006 01:44 UTC in reply to "RE: Doubtful"
rayiner Member since:
2005-07-06

What are you talking about? The Finder has had the shortcuts in the window since the public beta two years before XP was released. All they did in Panther was to move the shortcuts to the left hand side of the window.

RE[3]: Doubtful
by ronaldst on Tue 12th Dec 2006 01:59 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Doubtful"
ronaldst Member since:
2005-06-29

They modeled the Finder's main interface after Windows' open/save dialog window.

When Win2K & WinME was released, MS added a row of shortcuts to the left of the open/save dialog. I think ome versions of MS Office had that UI design even earlier.

Up until Jaguar, the Finder window had shortcuts on the toolbar much like NeXT. Only starting with Panther that Apple adopted the Open/Save dialog look for the Finder.

Need screenshots too?

RE[4]: Doubtful
by Tuishimi on Tue 12th Dec 2006 02:30 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Doubtful"
Tuishimi Member since:
2005-07-06

*chuckle* Yes, I am sure the Apple UI team said to themselves "darnit, it's hard to come up with a UI", "Hey guys! Check out the open/save dialog box on Windoze!", "Bingo, we have our new design!"

RE[4]: Doubtful
by Jesuspower on Tue 12th Dec 2006 02:32 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Doubtful"
Jesuspower Member since:
2006-01-28

Ms office got that side bar with office 2k.
But they did get the side bar idea from xp i think, and made it better. Its system-wide and configurable. XP's, and the open/save are not.

RE[4]: Doubtful
by dylansmrjones on Tue 12th Dec 2006 08:04 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Doubtful"
dylansmrjones Member since:
2005-10-02

I need screenshots yes.

I want proof and I want them now!

RE[2]: Doubtful
by dylansmrjones on Tue 12th Dec 2006 08:01 UTC in reply to "RE: Doubtful"
dylansmrjones Member since:
2005-10-02

Bullshit. XP's open/save dialogues are no different than those in Windows 2000 and they are not even remote related to anything in Gnome/KDE or the NeXTSTEP-based OS from Apple.

The Open/Save dialogues in Gnome are radically different than those in XP. However, Vista actually have implemented major parts of the Gnome Open/Save dialogues and file manager windows (like the bread crumbs).

RE[2]: Doubtful
by xmv_ on Tue 12th Dec 2006 13:41 UTC in reply to "RE: Doubtful"
xmv_ Member since:
2006-06-09

you realise that the Finder had those dialog boxes before XP was released ;) (Yes, the Finder existed before OSX. Heck, there were Macs before OSX! Truth! ;)

In other news they also all use windows (not Windows), menus, buttons, and a mouse pointers. This all was in MacOS before Gates even started Windows 1.0.

Also, it existed before the first Apple computers. That's also true.


links:
http://www.ucs.ed.ac.uk/usd/cts/ol/os/mac_osx/Panther/images/OS9_op...

didn't find the screen with OS's 9.2 Favorite inside the dialog though, and don't have this stone-age OS anymore ;)

Edited 2006-12-12 13:44

RE[2]: Doubtful
by kolmyo on Wed 13th Dec 2006 08:01 UTC in reply to "RE: Doubtful"
kolmyo Member since:
2005-07-11

Actually Finder behaviour is "copied" from NEXTSTEP, made by NeXT, which was founded by Steve Jobs. I wouldn't call that copying.

RE[2]: Doubtful
by Phloptical on Tue 12th Dec 2006 03:01 UTC in reply to "Doubtful"
Phloptical Member since:
2006-10-10

Since we're on the topic of Tea in China, I think I'm going to have to agree with one of the guys in the thread that claimed MS had pseudo-Finder first in Office2k. I distinctly remember coming across that, the first time, and thinking, "Hmm, that's different."

Saying things like "Finder is a rip-off of a MS feature that pre-dates OS X" is not really what I was going for in the post. I mean, I personally would have gone with the "Apple stole the mouse idea from IBM" argument before getting nit-picky with XP's save dialogs, but that's your preference....it's cool. Don't get me wrong, I'm not short-changing Windows features. I'm actually one of the few that like the Start button. Always did.

Let's just say that I'll leave it up to those, who know the early Mac OS far better than I, to list all the ways MS has "adopted" ideas from them. I've heard the allegations, and I really can't even begin to know where to start.

RE[3]: Doubtful
by smashIt on Tue 12th Dec 2006 03:26 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Doubtful"
smashIt Member since:
2005-07-06

I think I'm going to have to agree with one of the guys in the thread that claimed MS had pseudo-Finder first in Office2k.

iirc office 97 already had this feature

Edited 2006-12-12 03:41

RE: Doubtful
by BluenoseJake on Tue 12th Dec 2006 15:02 UTC in reply to "Doubtful"
BluenoseJake Member since:
2005-08-11

"I doubt Apple will stoop to Microsoft's level when it comes to style ideas on any product, let alone their OS"

Oh look, a True Believer(tm)

RE[2]: Not unexpected
by acobar on Tue 12th Dec 2006 00:17 UTC
acobar
Member since:
2005-11-15

To be the Vista killer it needs to run on commodity hardware and I don't think this is the big surprise Apple is cooking.

Even being a Linux and FreeBSD addict (and I really like KDE) I have to concede, the Mac interface is gorgeous and to me the new Vista one is not even close. Also, is a pleasure to have Unix tools and feeling under the hood (have played in a Mac Pro of one friend).

Maybe, I will extend my interest to Macs too.

Had someone played with any Intellicad for OS X? If so, can you share your experience? (thanks in advance)

RE[3]: Not unexpected
by eivind on Tue 12th Dec 2006 00:32 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Not unexpected"
eivind Member since:
2005-11-09

To be the Vista killer it needs to run on commodity hardware and I don't think this is the big surprise Apple is cooking.

I disagree, because most people don't buy OSes. They buy computers. And if a very appealing OS X makes them choose a Mac over a PC with preinstalled Windows, OS X could actually become a Windows killer for certain market segments.

Both MS and Apple are very well aware of this, and for the FLOSS movement it can seem a bit unfair. Sadly.

I hope Apple fixes what needs fixing
by ormandj on Tue 12th Dec 2006 00:20 UTC
ormandj
Member since:
2005-10-09

The UI is pretty decent as it is, what really needs to occur is a re-written finder. Not just some bug fixes, but a complete re-write. It's showing its age badly, and it's one of the most counter-intuitive file management systems I've ever used. Very un-apple-ish.

rayiner Member since:
2005-07-06

Yes! Every single folder on my system seems to have ended up with a different view setting, and I'm too numb to even care anymore. Finder is just weird, there is no other way to put it.

Tuz
by siraf72 on Tue 12th Dec 2006 00:22 UTC
siraf72
Member since:
2006-02-22

Apple love making a song and dance about being copied by MS. I suspect it will be sufficiently differentiated from vista.

Also - I think dashboard does show alot of dark gloss as was said in a comment earlier. Whatever the reasoning(and look) its probably safe to assume the design direction was detirmined some time ago.

NeXT renewed
by tyrione on Tue 12th Dec 2006 01:09 UTC
tyrione
Member since:
2005-11-21

It took much longer than anticipated, but I'm looking forward to it.

RE: NeXT renewed
by Tuishimi on Tue 12th Dec 2006 02:32 UTC in reply to "NeXT renewed"
Tuishimi Member since:
2005-07-06

Ha ha! I was thinking the same thing! "We've made the interface darker and more angular, and moved the dock to the upper right... the application menubar? Who needs it? GONE!"

RE[2]: NeXT renewed
by rferrel on Tue 12th Dec 2006 04:06 UTC in reply to "NeXT renewed"
rferrel Member since:
2006-03-21

We really need that, I miss the vertical menu bars on the left side of the window that had detachable submenus, the app menu bar is a pain in the biggest displays.

interesting
by arielb on Tue 12th Dec 2006 01:23 UTC
arielb
Member since:
2006-11-15

but how does it make things easier to use? What about text in the dock so that I don't have to mouseover to know what I'm dealing with?

Riots
by situation on Tue 12th Dec 2006 01:25 UTC
situation
Member since:
2006-01-10

This would probably cause violent street riots for all Apple users. Eventually the economy would collapse to the point that gangs and bandits roam the dusty highways in beaten up armored cars. Trust me, that's the background to Mad Max.

(Hopefully they have an option to go back to the old scheme, otherwise a lot of people would probably complain).

Illuminous?
by Maciek on Tue 12th Dec 2006 01:41 UTC
Maciek
Member since:
2005-11-15

Whoever faked this story probably meant "luminous", which is an actual word. "Illuminous" sounds like something out of a Dan Brown novel.

RE: Illuminous?
by tyrione on Tue 12th Dec 2006 02:47 UTC in reply to "Illuminous?"
tyrione Member since:
2005-11-21

Clearly, you've not read RAW much. Brown is a hack.

RE: Illuminous?
by chocobanana on Tue 12th Dec 2006 04:01 UTC in reply to "Illuminous?"
chocobanana Member since:
2006-01-04

I hope it isn't something from the medieval dark times... ;)

Just a joke

Asus' take on Vista
by tyrione on Tue 12th Dec 2006 03:20 UTC
tyrione
Member since:
2005-11-21

http://event.asus.com/review/events/vista_ready/index.htm

``Vista Premium Ready meets Vista premium hardware requirements.''

The powerful and dependable ASUS motherboards are the best choices for building Window Vista™ systems. With a wide range of new and friendly features, the combination of the latest operating system and ASUS motherboards dramatically enhances the overall computing experience.

http://event.asus.com/review/events/vista_ready/models.htm

Note: Two models for basic Vista.

BLACK? Maybe yes!
by bvkchaitanya on Tue 12th Dec 2006 04:20 UTC
bvkchaitanya
Member since:
2006-05-12

check this: www.rad-e8.com He is one of great icon/web designers on deviantart.

1. He used to use WHITE always, now he switched to BLACK.
2. He is now working in Apple.

Wanna see part of the future?
by thavith_osn on Tue 12th Dec 2006 04:26 UTC
thavith_osn
Member since:
2005-07-11

http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/index.html

Check out the icons for selecting the feature to see. As you roll your mouse over the icons, they are illuminated with a white glow behind them. I'm guessing if this rumor is correct, we will see something like this.

I thing we will see reflections of the icons (like in iTunes) as well.

Just two things I think we'll see... :-)

new pc's
by arielb on Tue 12th Dec 2006 06:45 UTC
arielb
Member since:
2006-11-15

most people already have pc's. why would they buy a new one when they still work?

Oh, they buy new pc's because they want to play better games. But even that will not help Mac. Or PC for that matter because everyone is into the game consoles.

Remember that the big revolution in getting new computers was because of the Y2K scare. That's not going to happen again.

RE: new pc's
by Yoda on Tue 12th Dec 2006 09:17 UTC in reply to "new pc's"
Yoda Member since:
2006-05-30

<< Remember that the big revolution in getting new computers was because of the Y2K scare. That's not going to happen again. >>

But it is (32 bit software on UNIX will fail in 2038)
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem"

Anyway the amount of installed computers (servers, desktop, laptops) has only gotten larger ever since y2k.
So is the amount of computers sold/year

this is an alternative theme right?
by alcibiades on Tue 12th Dec 2006 08:21 UTC
alcibiades
Member since:
2005-10-12

Is that right? Its exactly one alternative theme? The kind of thing one finds a few hundreds, maybe a few thousands, on

http://themes.freshmeat.net/

Is this what it is, and if so, is it really supposed to be news? Sitting here shaking my head and thinking, I must have missed something here, but what?

Anacardo Member since:
2005-10-30

If really IS a theme, that would definitely ve not much of a feature, still I believe there's probably much more under the hood. Resolution indipendence aside, the rumors concerning new full-screen modal modes for applications are interesting, and might denote a new course of action for application appearance in OSX (Maybe they'll get more apps running in frontrow, but that's just a guess)
As far as black is concerned, I tend to like black and have all my Xp boxes running a black theme. Still I really wish to have at least the twos (black an white versions of the same theme, that wouldn't be much of a problem to do) available. One side note though, have a look to "time machine". How would that work with a black theme? mmmmh...

Interesting
by Governa on Tue 12th Dec 2006 09:44 UTC
Governa
Member since:
2006-04-09

So Microsoft takes 5 years to copy Aqua and now Apple is going to change the rules? Shame on you Apple!

Microsoft logo (Aqua anyone?)
http://ascii24.com/news/i/topi/article/2006/08/08/thumbnail/thumb32...

Apple WWDC 2006-Windows Vista Copies Mac OS X
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-2C2gb6ws8

Microsoft rips off Apple’s Workgroup Manager icon
http://daringfireball.net/2006/12/microsoft_workgroup_manager_icon

Honestly those who compare Apple's new Illuminous UI with Vista are totally biased... for one thing nobody has yet seen this "Illuminous" version, how can you say something like "similar to Vista, indeed" ?! Just because it is based on the color black? Maybe Microsoft has patented black and we didn't know it...

What it does look like is that Microsoft based most of its black UI on Apple's Dashboard, Aperture navigation window, iPhoto’s Adjust Window, Front Row’s sliding dark glass, iTunes album preview... even on NeXT if you want. ;)

More info link...
by eMagius on Tue 12th Dec 2006 14:56 UTC
eMagius
Member since:
2005-07-06

The Appleology link gives an "This Account Has Been Suspended" message. Anyone care to fill us in on what was there?

We need more easily resizable windows.
by chas_martel on Tue 12th Dec 2006 16:07 UTC
chas_martel
Member since:
2006-12-04

I just want to be able to resize windows from
any size or corner.

henrikmk Member since:
2005-07-10

Nah, I don't want that, at least not the Windows way. Inadvertently grabbing a non-corner only to drag horizontally or vertically one too many times in Windows makes me furious.

What I'd rather see in OSX would be to use a hotkey with the left/right mouse button to resize or move the entire window. When the hotkey is held, clicking and dragging anywhere in the window with the left mouse button moves the entire window. When the right mouse button is held down, the window is divided into 4 equal sized zones and depending on which zone you are in, the window resizes via that corner. There are a few shoddy hacks that do this, but they are not stable.

If the hotkey isn't held, only the right lower corner could be used for resizing.

WindowMaker does this and it's a very nice and damn fast way to arrange windows with.

mahlerdi Member since:
2006-12-12

Right. If you think about it, Tablets, Tablet PCs and Touch Screens get cheaper and cheaper every day, the now 30 year old workflow of having one whole hand that translates into a little cursor is old and should be abandoned better sooner than later. Things have to change and the idea that the UI has to be controlled through a little cursor is the first thing that should go.

I'm pretty sure that Apple starts making their UIs more accessible and user-friendly and not just look different. A good looking UI is one thing, but what I'd really like to see in Leopard are these kind of changes, in the sense of not having to go somewhere with a cursor just to change a setting, but to change things 'on target' or on a more global level without the user moving his hands like nuts and causing RSI after like a few years of working on a computer.

I also think that things will go towards a black interface and way more full screen editing and controls. They've done some of that work in Apps like iPhoto, etc. already and I'm pretty sure Jobs likes using every inch of their 30" Cinema Displays for working. Pretty sure that Apple will do the right thing, they've got some components developed already.

Edited 2006-12-12 18:46

who cares?
by j.blechert on Wed 13th Dec 2006 14:15 UTC
j.blechert
Member since:
2006-01-04

Why should I put thought into what new skin/UI some guy at apple comes up with?
I could watch a talkshow and make more out of my time...

pics
by deanlinkous on Fri 15th Dec 2006 10:59 UTC
deanlinkous
Member since:
2006-06-19

did I miss the pics?