OSNews

I agree with some of your points as Reiser4 could simply be forked and carried on under the GPL. As mentioned in the article though the company also own some proprietry software (such as a file compressor) that could not be forked.

Hans also isn't the lead programmer (at least according to the namesys website) so development on the FS could continue.

I would say though, that ReiserFS does indeed have some brand recognition, particularly in techie circles, and if the benchmarks for Reiser4 are to be believed then it would seem a good chance to own a good file system at a good price...

Edited 2006-12-22 12:27

You could buy the company for the copyrights and then you can release the code under other licenses. That would be the main reason, I can see, to buy the company.

Well, Hans, you are the prime suspect in a murder investigation, and rightfully so. You've been charged, and rightfully so. Somehow, I just don't see the injustice. Then again, I suspect you're guilty as sin.

..guilty until proven innocent? Any proof of your assertions?

--Robin

"Innocent until proven guilty" is an excellent policy for the law and for the courts. Holding individuals' opinions to it is just silly. Circumstantial evidence is perfectly good evidence, especially when there is a *lot* of it. However, in a legal conviction, there really should be no doubt.

My personal opinion will not convict Mr. Reiser, and I am perfectly free to come to a reasonable conclusion based upon the evidence available. And it looks to me like he is guilty as sin.

yeah, his filesystem hosed my machine. he must be guilty.

hang ihm now !

</sarcasm>

I've been running ReiserFS for years and never had a problem. It is also faster than some of the other options.

Are you sure it was the FS?

"Innocent until proven guilty" is an excellent policy for the law and for the courts. Holding individuals' opinions to it is just silly. Circumstantial evidence is perfectly good evidence, especially when there is a *lot* of it. However, in a legal conviction, there really should be no doubt.

First, I'm not judging if Reiser did it or not. Couldn't care less. That's for others to decide.

Your logic sounds great until you're on the other side of the fence. A lot of circumstantial evidence can be gathered on any topic. And in Hanses case? He was living in that house (who doesn't argue at least few times, and especially if divorce is in question?). He was driving that car (hell, I seriously cut my self few times in my car, meaning if I disappear there will be dna evidence in it) He was never what you would call "people person", more like "dissociative arguing eccentric", so he's bound to look strange when his personality is taken to question. Another example, I bought few books about perfect murder too, not because I would be interested how should I do it, but rather because I was more intrigued by puzzle of algorithm which would cover all the facts.

I seem to fit your profile, but am I guilty?

It is like SCO case, except that for difference from SCO case where they say "We know you did it, now tell us how" here "He seems strange and this is why we suspect..." drives the court case.

It is hard to go against circumstantial evidence. Facts you can fight, global descriptions? much harder

Edited 2006-12-22 14:12

Perhaps I was not clear enough. What part of:

"""
"Innocent until proven guilty" is an excellent policy for the law and for the courts
"""

is so hard to understand?

My opinion doesn't mean diddly squat to the court. And I would not want it to.

Finchwizard posted this good link earlier in the thread:

http://tinyurl.com/yhqqge

Hans' strangeness is irrelevant.

Now, could we possibly talk about how this affects Reiser4?

Edited 2006-12-22 14:26

What's up with modding people down for voicing their own opinion? This post wasn't off topic or inflammatory in any way. There's no excuse for modding it down. I happen to agree with sbergman27 on this one, but even if I didn't I like to think I have a bit more discretion with the mod down button.

Please, guys, complaining about modding is off-topic. As you can see, sbergman27's post has been modded back up.

I've found that the modding system works pretty well: when people mod posts down for dubious reasons, others usually mod the posts back up a little later.

Saying that somebody is as guilty as sin without anything upon which to found one's statement is nowhere close to voicing an opinion: that's identical with making an accusation and defaming a man who has not yet been found guilty and condemned. In a private tête-à-tête conversation all this may be an inconsequential incident, but I'm not so sure it is in a public forum.

> Well, Hans, you are the prime suspect in a murder investigation, and
> rightfully so. You've been charged, and rightfully so. Somehow, I just
> don't see the injustice. Then again, I suspect you're guilty as sin.

Well... can anyone here translate the german word "Stammtischniveau"? That's the only thing that comes to my mind when I read such nonsense.

So he is rightfully the prime suspect... because he is the prime suspect?

He is charged rightfully... without proof? Right, who needs proof when we already have a scapegoat.

It doesn't matter if he is guilty or not. Without *proof* that he is guilty, he should not be affected. Or better, you could just admit that he does not live in a consitutional state, and stop talking about rightfulness.

sbergman27, you used to post in this forum at a migh higher level than you do now. I wonder if your account got hijacked...

I can translate that, although it makes little sense. A "stammtisch" is a table reserved for regulars in German and Austrian pubs. "Niveau" is a lenition (loan word) from French meaning "level".

"Level table" is like "level playing field" meaning 'fair', I would guess, from context.

It would seem to be an admonishment to hear out both sides before deciding the guilt in this story.

I guess you don't even live some 100 miles close to Reiser's home. But sure, anyone on the internet, as you are, knows first, who is guilt in a murder trial without even the body found.


Sorry, but even "clearer" cases can have a big twist. For example: http://www.truthinjustice.org/Paul-House.htm


Heiser is in a bad position. Sure he seems to be the killer. But you can't know if it's the truth, especially not just because you didn't like him before. And although this is only your opinion, I have to raise the question how much/less evidence you need to form your opinion?

Edited 2006-12-22 12:26

"""But you can't know if it's the truth..."""

Of course not. And I have not claimed that I do. Others have jumped to the conclusion that I have said so. (Ironic, when you think about it, huh?)

I have said that I "suspect" he is guilty. I have said that "it looks to me like he is guilty". I have *not* said that I know he is guilty, bloody sleeping bags in the back seat aside.

Time will tell, I suppose. Or maybe it won't if he hid the body well enough. ;-)

No one has commented on my assertion that this is a good thing for Reiser4, BTW.

You pretty much hit the nail on the head. Of course, you really should wait a bit - a man is innocent until proven guilty.

Dave

"""
Linux, the only one operating system running on a filesystem designed by a murderer.
"""

You'd never make it in marketing.

Reiser4: The Killer Filesystem! ;-)

LOL sbgerman27, I was about to write the exact same :o)

You're hired!

Edit: Sorry, completely misread the comment.

I don't really know what to think. But this is sad, I don't really think he's gonna be able to sell anything from the jail :-S

Edited 2006-12-22 13:28

umm.. reiser is not the main filesystem in linux. Its ext3. Or did I miss something?

Yeah, burn him!

"""
Yeah, burn him!
"""

I believe they use lethal injection in California. However, it appears that Hans may be in luck. According to Wikipedia:

"In February of 2006, a de facto moratorium on capital punishment was enforced in California as the state was unable to obtain the services of a licensed medical professional to carry out the execution of Michael Morales. The occurrence came as a result of an injunction made by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals which held that an execution could only be carried out by a medical technician legally authorized to administer IV medications, as the lethal injection procedure if wrongfully performed could lead to suffering for the condemned, potentially constituting cruel and unusual punishment."

I absolutely agree with your statement, 100%.

But what if he is not guilty,
what if his wife got killed by somebody else, she simply flew or whatever..., and let us even assume the court to be fair and the case will be investigated fully and in an honest unbiased manner and he gets acquited.

He lost

* his company,
* and therefore his job,
* his kids,
* his reputation,
* ...

it won't help him too much anyway.

Dude, you really need to take the tin foil hat off and go outside (the black helicopters won't shoot). Do you really think that the government is behind this? Please tell me you aren't serious!

skipping the Hans Reiser stuff -- why does it need a new filesystem ? reiserfs itself doesn't cut it really, unless you like botched filesystems now and then....

there are a lot of oher filesystems to choose from.

"""why does it need a new filesystem ? reiserfs itself doesn't cut it really, unless you like botched filesystems now and then...."""

Agreed about the botchedness. Hopefully, a new owner, with less "vision" and less attitude would fix the botched parts and get the (long stalled) Reiser4 show on the road.

Personally, I'm more excited about ext4, which is not suffering from such a severe case of impedance mismatch with the rest of the kernel.

"there are a lot of oher filesystems to choose from."

Basically we are left only with ext3, which I don't like because of many reasons.

Compare it with OS X which has now HFS+ and should have ZFS soon...

Basically we are left only with ext3, which I don't like because of many reasons.

There are more filesystems available for Linux than that...what about JFS and XFS? Isn't HFS also available?

"""Isn't HFS also available?"""

I was going to say no, I don't think so. But then I checked. There is an hfs and hfsplus in my /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/fs directory.

So what are hfs(+)'s pros and cons? I'm curious.

"Isn't HFS also available?"

To my knowledge the Linux kernel has read-only support for HFS. In any case I have never seen an installer which offered HFS as an option (and I believe I have tried all Linux installers)