Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Mon 29th Jan 2007 20:10 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless Hi-Mobile.net was very generous to send us over the second most high-end Nokia S40-based phone (after the 7390) for a review, the 6288. This model is an updated version over its similarly-looking 6280, and it's considered a high-end feature phone. Read more for our findings and plenty of screenshots.
E-mail Print r 1   · Read More · 19 Comment(s)
Order by: Score:
"Feature"
by netpython (2.44) on Mon 29th Jan 2007 17:29 UTC
netpython
Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 6

Not really feature packed as the coming N95.

RE: "Feature"
by Eugenia (Staff) on Mon 29th Jan 2007 17:32 UTC in reply to ""Feature""
Eugenia Member since:
2005-06-28
Fans: 15

You don't understand. Anything that it's above low-end but not a smartphone, it's called "feature phone", regardless of the features it has (or not). It's a classification, not a statement to its features.

RE[2]: "Feature"
by memson (3) on Tue 30th Jan 2007 14:02 UTC in reply to "RE: "Feature""
memson Member since:
2006-01-01
Fans: 3

"feature phone" isn't a term I've heard used over here in the UK. We seem to get "mobile phones" and "pda phones" pretty much. You buy what you can afford.

It sounds a bit like a buzzword. Like VCR (we say "Video"), "RV" (we say "car" or "4x4"), "SUV" (we say "car", "4x4" or "School run car" :-P ), realtor (?sp?), i.e. "house seller" (we say "estate agent")

Why does the US have to make everything so complex and categorised??

RE[3]: "Feature"
by Moochman (2.84) on Tue 30th Jan 2007 18:50 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: "Feature""
Moochman Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 1

Most people don't called them "feature phones". However, for the purposes of product review, it makes sense to be a bit more specific. I suspect review sites like CNet have had a lot to do with the "phone categorization scheme".

So basically, it is a buzzword. But it makes sense to use in this review...

Why do the British have to make so many generalizations about other countries' populations? ;-)

RE: "Feature"
by ormandj (4) on Mon 29th Jan 2007 18:20 UTC in reply to ""Feature""
ormandj Member since:
2005-10-09
Fans: 6

Just because there is (always) something better coming down the road, doesn't make something junk.

Yes, it doesn't have as many features as the upcoming N95. Apple IIs don't have as many features as Apple Mac Pros either. When Apple IIs came out, however, they were most certainly feature products, in fact feature FILLED products!

So, while this phone may not be as fancy as the N95, it is still most certainly a feature phone, as Eugenia mentioned - it does more than make a call.

Come on, don't be so picky! ;)

It looks like a very nice phone, on another note. It would make a good weekend-beater type phone I think, without giving up too much of the functionality of my S60 phone. Good review!

Any other IMPS ?
by jaxx (2.2) on Mon 29th Jan 2007 19:33 UTC
jaxx
Member since:
2006-10-18
Fans: 0

Just to relief any worry, I believe Yamigo is dead, as well as SmartVAS... So if anybody knows open any free IMPS service which is opened to different networks, let us know :-)

RE: Any other IMPS ?
by Eugenia (Staff) on Mon 29th Jan 2007 19:40 UTC in reply to "Any other IMPS ?"
Eugenia Member since:
2005-06-28
Fans: 15

I don't know any other. There is a Dutch (or was it Danish?) site that offers support for 3 IM protocols, but the whole site is not in english and it requires you give them your phone number...

Really, if there was someone offering a WirelessVillage service (with a jabber backend and AIM/GTalk/ICQ/MSN/Y! hooks -- just like YamiGo but without their bugs), it would be so great!

RE[2]: Any other IMPS ?
by -Anders (1) on Wed 31st Jan 2007 07:45 UTC in reply to "RE: Any other IMPS ?"
-Anders Member since:
2006-01-04
Fans: 0

You might be thinking of www.chatnu.dk

Switching between multitasking java applications
by msundman (3.08) on Mon 29th Jan 2007 20:00 UTC
msundman
Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 0

If you like the java implementation I must assume that it supports running several java apps concurrently. How easy/fast is it to switch between them? How many button presses from the main screen to switch to some particular java app that is running?

Eugenia Member since:
2005-06-28
Fans: 15

I am not sure how I can make it to switch apps. Not sure if supports it or not. This is not usually a J2ME implementation detail anyway, it's an OS one.

msundman Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 0

> I am not sure how I can make it to switch apps. Not
> sure if supports it or not.

Hopfully it does support it, because otherwise most of the really useful apps, like IMs, calendars, email-notifiers, etc. are pretty much useless on this phone.

> This is not usually a J2ME implementation detail
> anyway, it's an OS one.

In a device as integrated as a mobile phone this is really splitting hairs.

Photos, finally?
by Buck (3.84) on Mon 29th Jan 2007 21:38 UTC
Buck
Member since:
2005-06-29
Fans: 1

The pictures it makes are finally more or less decent for a phone. Not horribly ugly at least.

3G???
by mini-me (1.96) on Mon 29th Jan 2007 22:26 UTC
mini-me
Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 0

Where is the 3G?
I only see EDGE and GPRS on the specs sheet

RE: 3G???
by Eugenia (Staff) on Mon 29th Jan 2007 22:27 UTC in reply to "3G???"
Eugenia Member since:
2005-06-28
Fans: 15

Check here for complete specs:
http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_6288-1711.php

Video
by PowerMacX (3.8) on Tue 30th Jan 2007 01:31 UTC
PowerMacX
Member since:
2005-11-06
Fans: 0

I like the video, the water looks computer-generated, particularly in the second half of the video.
There hasn't been a mention of video recording in certain other "phone" (you know which one I'm talking about) - I really hope those other guys are not considering video recording an extra, it's really a basic, obvious feature for phone with built in cameras.
SVGA resolution would be nice, but VGA videos look acceptable on most non-HD TVs.

One request
by Hark3n (2) on Tue 30th Jan 2007 11:50 UTC
Hark3n
Member since:
2007-01-15
Fans: 0

OGG!!!

I really want to see a cell with native OGG support. Most of my music collection is in OGG.

And yes, I do know about the ROKR E2, but we won't be getting it in South Africa.

Argh POP-PORT
by Moochman (2.84) on Tue 30th Jan 2007 18:58 UTC
Moochman
Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 1

Until Nokia & Motorola put out MP3 phones that USE NORMAL HEADPHONE JACKS, I will consider their products to be inferior to all other MP3-players on the market. Even SONY uses them on its Walkman phones! What's the point of an MP3 feature phone if it doesn't match the most basic functionality of the simplest MP3 player (i.e. letting you use whatever headphones you want, or plug the player into a stereo).

Edit: Hmm apparently Nokia does offer some phones with a headphone jack--the N76 and N91. Also, apparently Sony offers the jack on the W600 but not the W800. Damnit! Why can't they all just include it already! Sure, they claim that their special jacks allow for answering calls with the headphones on, but with the size of those pop-port connectors I'm sure they could just as easily come up with a combination 3.5mm/proprietary remote/mic jack a la what you find on pretty much any music players that have in-line remotes.

Their real motivation is clear: they want money for proprietary peripherals! (potentially they also want to limit recording capabilities for DRM-lock-in purposes.) Too bad they screw the consumer over in the process!

Edited 2007-01-30 19:17

RE: Argh POP-PORT
by Eugenia (Staff) on Tue 30th Jan 2007 20:36 UTC in reply to "Argh POP-PORT"
Eugenia Member since:
2005-06-28
Fans: 15

The Nokia phones that are supposed to be "music phones" do come with a standard audio jack. The 5300/5200 also come with a standard jack. I do agree that 2.5mm and mini-usb is the way to go though for ALL the phones.

Solution
by Moochman (2.84) on Tue 30th Jan 2007 19:26 UTC
Moochman
Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 1

Okay, well at least there's an easy solution to the pop-port problem in the meantime:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/KMS-DIRECT-Headphone-Adapter-Compatible/dp/...