Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 4th Feb 2007 21:08 UTC, submitted by kenvandine
Linux Distrowatch did the first review of Foresight Linux 1.0. They conclude: "Overall, despite a few early glitches while installing Foresight Linux 1.0, this distribution has turned out to be very usable system with an excellent package management utility and a unique, web based system configuration manager. It is clearly designed for users who enjoy GNOME and Mono software on their desktops or those who want to try the latest versions of these applications."
Order by: Score:
v not impressed
by mark_in_rdjbrasil on Sun 4th Feb 2007 21:35 UTC
RE: not impressed
by cmost on Mon 5th Feb 2007 01:32 UTC in reply to "not impressed"
cmost Member since:
2006-07-16

Well, YOU obviously didn't know how to set up pppoe, so why would you expect someone else unfamiliar with your particular setup to know how to do it? Foresight is a brilliant up and coming distribution.

Reply Score: 3

RE: not impressed
by kaiwai on Mon 5th Feb 2007 04:05 UTC in reply to "not impressed"
kaiwai Member since:
2005-07-06

Maybe you should stop abusing the developer and do a little googling - Roaring Penguin is your friend: http://www.roaringpenguin.com/en/penguin/openSourceProducts/rpPppoe

More reading, less abusing.

Reply Score: 4

Uhhh
by zizban on Sun 4th Feb 2007 21:50 UTC
zizban
Member since:
2005-07-06

his less than enthusiastic response with me was that he didn't really know pppoe configuration for brasil.

Is he from Brazil? If not, how he would know such stettings?

Reply Score: 5

RE: Uhhh
by mark_in_rdjbrasil on Mon 5th Feb 2007 00:05 UTC in reply to "Uhhh"
mark_in_rdjbrasil Member since:
2005-11-30

gee, doesn't pppoe configuration work the same in any location ? username + password = internet access. those are the settings that pclinux and dreamlinux offer in their forum base....and they work very effeciently.

Edited 2007-02-05 00:06

Reply Score: 2

RE[2]: Uhhh
by johndaly on Mon 5th Feb 2007 00:33 UTC in reply to "RE: Uhhh"
johndaly Member since:
2006-01-16

Some providers like to screw with the system, like T-Com here in Germany. Instead of having just a password and a username they insist on giving you 4 numbers. They try to force you to use their software that way but you can also mash the numbers together in a rather unintuitive way to use pppoe like normal providers do.

As to the problem with resolution and pppoe there is documentation on the internet and on your computer. For the resolution try man xconfig and for pppoe try man adsl.

Reply Score: 2

theme
by RJop on Sun 4th Feb 2007 22:19 UTC
RJop
Member since:
2007-01-08

Looks really great. I think it's one of the best looking GNOME distro so far.

Reply Score: 2

...
by Hiev on Sun 4th Feb 2007 23:42 UTC
Hiev
Member since:
2005-09-27

Foresight Linux was the first distro who introduced Mono (after SUSE of course) in the default installation and I respect the author(s) for having the balls to do it.

Reply Score: 1

I am downloading it
by Raha on Mon 5th Feb 2007 00:17 UTC
Raha
Member since:
2006-02-02

I am downloading it, which package does it use rpm or deb ?

Reply Score: 1

RE: I am downloading it
by siimo on Mon 5th Feb 2007 00:26 UTC in reply to "I am downloading it"
siimo Member since:
2006-06-22

It uses Conary. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conary_(package_manager)

Its a new type of package management system that can partially update packages (only files in the package that need updating instead of downloading the whole package with new version).

It is used by rPath that Foresight is based on. Read more about it here: http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Conary:Overview

Reply Score: 2

RE: I am downloading it
by butters on Mon 5th Feb 2007 04:13 UTC in reply to "I am downloading it"
butters Member since:
2005-07-08

Wow, you download random distributions without knowing the first thing about them? Well, at least you're not afraid to try new things...

Conary is pretty sweet. It's both a package manager and a revision control systems. Perhaps the first "new-school" packaging system that actually tries to make the upstream developer's job easier.

Reply Score: 2

RE[2]: I am downloading it
by alwayscrashing on Mon 5th Feb 2007 05:01 UTC in reply to "RE: I am downloading it"
alwayscrashing Member since:
2006-01-13

Surely downloading random distributions is one of the best ways of learning things about them?

There's always time for checking documentation later if it uses something completely non-standard.

Reply Score: 2

RE[3]: I am downloading it
by butters on Mon 5th Feb 2007 06:34 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: I am downloading it"
butters Member since:
2005-07-08

Yeah, sure, but I normally take a look at the web page first. You know, see how active the forums are and whatever.

Truth be told, I don't really try distributions anymore. I cured my distro-junkyism several years ago when I convinced myself of one seemingly fundamental truth: you rarely like a new distribution more than the one you're most comfortable with.

At first I bounced around a little, didn't really like Red Hat 6.2 or Mandrake 7.0 or Slackware or Debian Potato. I found Gentoo in early 2002 and have been using that predominantly ever since. I played around with Arch (even wrote an advanced installer for it), but it just wasn't big enough to keep up-to-date the way Gentoo does. I tried Ubuntu because it was so popular, and I still use it as my favorite LiveCD, but it isn't as comfortable for me day-to-day.

If some distribution becomes so big and everyone starts buzzing about it, then I'll give it a whirl. But I won't try little distributions unless their philosophy really resonates with me (like Gentoo and Arch did). Because otherwise I know I'll just end up being uncomfortable. And I just don't have the time anymore.

Reply Score: 5

RE[4]: I am downloading it
by twenex on Mon 5th Feb 2007 17:58 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: I am downloading it"
twenex Member since:
2006-04-21

And that, sir, is the crux{,gentoo,ubuntu, slackware,redhat} of the issue!

Well done.

Reply Score: 2

wow
by broken_symlink on Mon 5th Feb 2007 01:11 UTC
broken_symlink
Member since:
2005-07-06

that stuff about metisse looks very interesting. http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20070129#news

Reply Score: 1

RE: wow
by butters on Mon 5th Feb 2007 04:44 UTC in reply to "wow"
butters Member since:
2005-07-08

It turns out that flipping windows into the plane of the desktop isn't that hard; you can do it without any 3D acceleration at all. Good thing nobody told MS about that...

Reply Score: 2

RE[2]: wow
by kaiwai on Mon 5th Feb 2007 08:03 UTC in reply to "RE: wow"
kaiwai Member since:
2005-07-06

Pardon? Butters, you could always accomplish that - the problem was, it requires major CPU grunt; so the most logical thing is, why not use the GPU which sits like a spare prick at a wedding 1/2 the time, shunt the stuff off to it, and free up CPU time for more important things.

Reply Score: 5

RE[3]: wow
by rayiner on Mon 5th Feb 2007 18:57 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: wow"
rayiner Member since:
2005-07-06

By and large, you're not flipping windows around often enough that it uses up any major portion of your CPU time. As long as it happens fast enough to be interactive, what does it matter?

And of course, don't forget that on laptops its usually a better idea to let the CPU do the work than to bring the GPU out of low-power mode to do it.

Reply Score: 3

nice
by kwanbis on Mon 5th Feb 2007 02:10 UTC
kwanbis
Member since:
2005-07-06

another distro

Reply Score: 2

RE: nice
by diskinetic on Tue 6th Feb 2007 00:01 UTC in reply to "nice"
diskinetic Member since:
2005-12-09

Sigh...

Another leggy blond supermodel...

Reply Score: 1