Post a Comment
Eugenia, thanks for this. Did you do anything by way of color calibration? Did the monitor come with icc profiles and did you import them into Windows and set one up as default? Did you set up and adjust a gamma program at all? Do you know what color space and temperature you're running at? Does the Viewsonic come with own-brand software that does all this and if so what's it like?
These are just questions out of interest and in no way critical. I recently got a Belinea monitor. It's very nice indeed, after it's been calibrated. But out of the box, it was glaringly bright and the colors were way off. Turning the contrast down, as you did with the VX2235wm, helped with the glare but didn't do much for the colors.
I have a feeling that many monitor makers are just knocking the stuff out these days, with the result that users suffer a degraded experience unless they take some time to set their monitor up properly. Of course, this may not apply to Viewsonic which is a premium brand I'd imagine.
Hmmn, the makings of an OSNews articlelet begin to stir. A couple of utilities mean it's even quite easy to do this on Linux these days, which at one time it certainly wasn't.
On Windows, I downloaded the latest driver version for this monitor from Viewsonic website and installed it. After it was done, the default monitor profile was changed by the driver, and it's now using the Viewsonic-recommended one. The only adjustments I had to make *before* I installed the driver was to just "auto calibrate" and this fixed the screen that was a tiny bit off (the colors were as accurate though). The monitor is at 6500k btw.
On Windows, I downloaded the latest driver version for this monitor from Viewsonic website and installed it. After it was done, the default monitor profile was changed by the driver, and it's now using the Viewsonic-recommended one. The only adjustments I had to make *before* I installed the driver was to just "auto calibrate" and this fixed the screen that was a tiny bit off (the colors were as accurate though). The monitor is at 6500k btw.
Ah nice, so with this brand a lot is done for you. If only that were true of all of them.
Yes, my Samsung monitor supports both vertical and horizontal, which was the reason I shed $600 for it.
It is absolutely amazing using a web browser with it, pages just fit! Office documents, programming, also much more efficient to use than in widescreen!
This is why I use one widescreen monitor for movies and normal apps, and a vertical monitor for documents. Bliss!
Are your sure? The reason I asked about the vertical oriented LCD was because of this page:
http://www.grc.com/ctwhat.htm
And I can tell you for sure that both the Thinkpad I'm typing this on and my MacBook at home have that same pixel component arrangement.
Why this monitor costs 249$ in US, and in an online shop in my country is 439€? which is more than 500$?
Why europeans have always to pay more to get the same technology? Why at best we have the weird conversion of 1$ = 1€, while in reality 1€ more than 1.3$?
Sometimes being an european sucks, and buying latest technology sucks quite a lot.
I did a comparison myself once and that is not true.
On many occasions it would be cheaper to buy the stuff online and ship it to Europe even including tariffs, additional payments ... would still be cheaper.
Yet this still was no option for me, as it would overcomplicate warranty claims.
Imo companies know that they can exhaust us, maybe once higher prices were due to shippment costs etc., but imo now they only remain because people still buy the overprized stuff. Look at the PS3, in Europe it is stripped down, yet we still pay more.
PS3 on Amazon.de:
599 Euro
599 / 1.19 = 503.36 Euro (without VAT)
503.36 * 1.364 = 686.58 US Dollar
PS3 on Amazon.com:
599.99 US Dollar
Germans pay 14.4% more just for the sake of it.
VX2235wm on Amazon.de
483.56 Euro
483.56 / 1.19 = 406.35 Euro (without VAT)
406.35 * 1.364 = 554.27 US Dollar
VX2235wm on Amazon.com
346.29 US Dollar
60.1% more, for what?
In fact I can compare a single product on a single shop. I never said this example is representative - and in fact it is not - it just outlines what I experienced on many occasions.
The costs of translation are negligible in the case of the PS3 or a LCD compared to the total costs of production, R & D etc.
Additionally did the EU lowered the distribution costs a lot. So there remains marketing as main inflater. Yet I doubt they invest so much in marketing that you could legitimate a 60% higher price.
As for taxes not being included in the US price, most US states "require" that you pay tax on items that you've ordered online. My local sales tax is 9%, which would bring the $599 PS3 price up to $652.91.
You still pay more, I'll admit, and what's more, the taxes (on the online orders) are more of an "honor system" than anything, so I don't know anyone who pays them.
[edit] If you buy locally, you have to pay the tax.
Edited 2007-04-27 15:25
Almost a year ago now I bought a 19" wide screen lcd from viewsonic and im still impressed every time I look at it, the brightness is phenomenal, the quality is just unmatched for the price. In fact a couple people who just came over to surf around on this computer ended up buying the monitor a couple days after. I don't ever see it advertised around, the side by side I got at officemax with the likes of Sony, Princeton, Samsung in the mix and this is the one I saw first. Better than the rest, and hundreds of dollars less... I'll take it!
Buyer beware
In the disclosure at bottom, I see dead pixels are now called Bright or Dark Dots in refurbish speak. Huh?
http://www.geeks.com/details.asp?invtid=VS11446-R&cpc=SCH
I had the misfortune to pay full price for another LCD model at another well known online site T.D. and it had 12 dead pixels defects. It took 2mths to get a replacement.
I suspect refurbished in LCD panel speak only means it has higher threshold of dead pixels but less than worst allowed. Can't see much other reason for LCDs to be reburbished.
Brian
And that is supposed to be high resolution? it doesent cut it. My 15" laptop has 1400x1050, and i could easily use higher resolution, my brothers laptop is 14.1", and it too runs 1400x1050, now THATS the perfect resolution.
though im gonna go with a samsung 30" with 2560x1600, it has the resolution i need, allthough the DPI isnt as high as some might want, i think its okay cause its so big it needs to be further away.
>it could atleast have covered the panel type used and >compared it to say a new TN-panel of whatever brand
Sorry, but you ask for too much. The panel was not sent to me from ViewSonic, but from a retailer. I have no way or knowing what kind of panel that is, neither I can't compare it to another TN-whatever-the-hell that is panel because, well, I don't have access to that stuff.
My review was a user's review. While I do have an extensive lab, most of the hardware comes from retailers, not from the manufacturers (unlike sites like Engadget and Gizmodo). And therefore, I have limited contacts towards more internal specs.







). I think this is the LCD I recommended to someone. I'll be visiting them soon so I'm looking forward to trying it out. It'll probably blow my 19" monitor away.
)