Post a Comment
Thank you for building in an opt-out to this system.
You can't turn the gravatar thing off in v3. You can only turn avatars off in v4 - and the v4 avatars have nothing to do with gravatar (yet - OSN v4 might make use of the gravatar system, or it might not).
Edited 2007-07-03 20:56
Yes, there will be a turn off ability on v4 (which will be released sometime soon). Also, I was testing Gravatar on osnews for 2 months now (in the admin version) and on average, there are only about 1 gravatar icons per 100 comments. I don't expect it to be a big deal although it can be a bit of distraction if not more users don't get an icon. Hopefully, v4 is coming soon.
Edited 2007-07-03 21:02
Yes, it could be the osnews caching. It seems that when the caching was written down the specific gravatar server that was holding your icon was not responding. Give it 10 minutes or so. I can see your icon now on all views in my admin version that bypasses caching.
Edited 2007-07-03 21:40
In FF 2.0.x there is a brief flicker while a placeholder image is loaded if the user doesn't have a gravatar, i.e. the 'default' image is briefly displayed on the left hand side of the comment, then disappears. Do a hard refresh (Ctrl-F5) on this thread and you'll see it on Almafeta's first comment.
The flicker I'm seeing is much larger than 1x1...if I had to guess I'd say more like 20x20, but it's very brief so hard to tell (less than a second). The displayed image is the standard broken image. Not a huge deal, but I'm a perfectionist.
It'd also be nice if gravas anchored back to the user's profile page
Basically, this is how it works, yes, because the email address is used as an ID. However, many many sites support gravatar for 2 years now and there was never a privacy issue -- which is why we decided to go with it. IF there is a documented case against Gravatar though, we will of course retract support for it.
Their privacy statememt is pretty clear: http://site.gravatar.com/privacy
Edited 2007-07-03 21:26
...you probably missed the point, it's about easily seeing/recognize WHO write that "content"... but I'm in favor of the turn-off option... as it's already stated that it will be available, well... may Greek and Troy be in peace now?
(semi)off-topic: As we're talking about bugs here... the quote tag [ q ] and [ /q ] doesn't show-up properly in the preview... it's a long standing bug (since quote tag was introduced)
The server does not return a 404, there is an API to return a custom image, and this is what we do. We return a 1x1 image.
I will look at the permalink.php problem, but Konqueror showing a broken image elsewhere looks like a Konqueror bug.
EDIT: I found what the problem is, but we will have to wait for Adam to come back from vacations to fix it. Regarding Konqueror always showing a broken image instead of a 1x1 gif image, that's a bug in Konqueror.
Edited 2007-07-03 22:32
I can't see yours yet. It takes a bit for their DB to be refreshed, and then you will have to wait 10 more minutes for the osnews caching to be refreshed too. Also, make sure that you registered with them with the same email address as you did for osnews.
Edited 2007-07-03 22:55
I know v3 is on its way out but...
The avatar shouldn't be in the body of the post but rather next to the name in the header. I realize this means more screen real estate being taken for the post headers but making it its own little box with styled beveled edge like the rest of the header bits would make more sense.
OK, bitchfest over. Great idea guys!
Of course they aren't, but neither are Gravatars (or any of the alternatives like .Mac icons, either). Overall, only a tiny minority of Internet users have any of them.
However, the decentralized serving method used by Picons gives them potentially significantly faster performance than either Gravatars or .Mac icons, and it's trivial to support additional flavors of personal icon once the initial one has been added. Some forums out there already support Picons and .Mac icons in addition to (or instead of) Gravatars.
Picons see pretty wide support in e-mail utilities ranging from the ubiquitous SquirrelMail to the expansive Emacs. I suspect that considering OS News' target audience there'll be just as many here already using Picons in some capacity as there are using Gravatars.
To be honest I find it both annoying and distracting. Taking away focus from the important stuff, the actual text of the comment.
Moving it out of the comment box would help immensely. Making it easier for the brain to filter it out, and concentrate on the interesting bits. I guess there are some usability theories about such things.
I think above the comment box, on the right side could be a better place. It's just a empty space now, so the spot is avaliable.
Unfortunately, as I explained above, there are MANY cases where the topic is too long and that would not fit the icon on th the table cells above. When Adam was writing v3 made clear that nothing else fits there -- at least not all the time.
You can turn off icons when V4 is getting released soon. Besides, as I also explained, most users won't have a gravatar, sans this very story.
there are MANY cases where the topic is too long and that would not fit the icon on th the table cells above
The MANY cases I really doubt, very long topics are rathere rare. If you look at the stories in todays frontpage there are far fewer(if any) long topics than the number of gravatars. And it's a simple problem to solve, by placing a length limitation on the subject field.
The only other case making trouble would be in Expanded Threaded view, with many successive replies. And simply placing the gravatar on top of the subject text her would not be a problem. It's treaded afterall, you don't read the subject line again and again.
You can turn off icons when V4 is getting released soon</>
Good.
[i]most users won't have a gravatar
That actually makes it worse, having the text start at different positions makes it harder to ignore/filter out.
What about putting them on the right side? That just seems more intuitive to me because you start reading from the left. It puts the focus on the comment text, not the avatar. For me, having it on the left is like "Bam, avatar!".
If someone doesn't like them, it seems to me they wouldn't be as noticable on the right. Or people that don't like them would grow to like them if they didn't find them as distracting.
I see there's already a stylish style for this http://userstyles.org/styles/2789 
Many thanks, my Opera is happy now
I just got one of these things. Database and cache probably haven't refreshed yet, but maybe I'll get lucky and see my Gravatar when I post this.
I see why this could bother some people and how it could be distracting, but I like it. It makes it way easier for me to tell who's posting what, at least if they have a(n) (Gr)avatar. Hell, I tend to ignore the commenters usernames unless I'm giving out mod points or posting a reply. For me, the little pictures are way easier and quicker to recognize.
However they are a bit distracting.
Perhaps they could go something like this:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~mjvermeulen/Images/suggestion.bmp
"So when will you redo the site to use divs instead of tables?
"
I'll answer this one for you as I'm sure the OSNews staff is sick of answering it: As soon as divs display consistently across a wide variety of browsers.
Repeat after me: There is nothing wrong with using tables to display tabular data.
I don't really see the usefulness in only providing gravatars to root posts, I'd like to see them in all posts, thanks. Not to mention, I can't see much use in them anyhow
Now a request, please add http://microid.org/ to http://www.osnews.com/user.php?uid=**** pages so external sites like claimid.com can verify accounts.
It's really quick & simple to add.
Adds a bit of much needed personality and personalization to the site...
While we can all recognize certain names, I'm afraid most of the time I can only recognize the names of those who I tend to disagree with. I am TERRIBLE with names, especially usernames...
This not only makes it easier to remember who is who (unless of course they change avatars), it also allows us to glimpse a bit of each other's personality - mine for example, reveals just how big a nerd I am...
Like somebody said above - make gravatar part of the comment header. In start of text it just breaks text and comments flow.
Little mockup - current and proposed placement:
http://www.stv.ee/~donq/osnews/gravatar.htm
Instead of 1x1 blank gif you could then display some other placeholder to match avatar size. Currently even 1x1 is too much - it makes first comment line indented (at least in Opera), what looks ugly.
Otherwise good idea 
I just had another look at the code, I don't think we can put it in the header. You see, there is already a cell called "Score: X" or "OSN Staff" and this cell must be quite large -- larger than the icon needs to be which automatically adopts the width of the largest cell in the table. Because the headers are usually long, this will push the design 10% of the time to create a third line of text, and this will make the design really ugly.
Sorry, but looking at the code, it is not possible to put the icon on the headers. Just wait for version 4 of osnews where the design is different.
Edited 2007-07-04 16:58



