Post a Comment
How so?
Wider support for FUSE surely means that more developers will work on it, and the existing code will be more thoroughly tested.
I don't know why you've been modded down for expressing your opinion here, but at the same time I don't really understand why it would be counter productive!
Guess why? Don't bash Apple. Do it and you'll suffer tremendous pain
>but at the same time I don't really understand why it would be counter productive!
Because why should open-source freely give away its crown jewels to companies like Apple and Microsoft? Especially Apple who is very eager to spread the word about its "superiority" in terms of hardware and software? Apple MacOS is build on open-source software, its own work is somewhat couture, nothing more, nothing less. So yes it hurts to see real superior software in the hands of this company.
I agree that Apple (IMO) should give more credit to open source projects... but I also understand that they are out to make $$$. So... they do what they do and do it well.
I use a lot of open source software on my Mac which is good in case I ever decide to switch to BSD or linux again. I am glad it is available... so it obviously isn't a waste in my opinion.
I don't get your comment ... how does that project relate to not playing games on Mac?
This being said, I am very glad that this project is a reality. Definitely a feature that all "modern" operating systems should have. Thanks to the developers of that open-source project for making it possible.
if you are looking for sshfs only there is another young project called sshfs for darwin. check it out:
http://mac.pqrs.org/sshfs/
it has some nice features like follow syslinks, non-default ports, etc.



