Post a Comment
I don't know how it was back then but now, it is very modern.
Rox desktop has one of the best dock available out there. You get a task manager that show running applications and support dnd. If multiple windows are open, you get a popup select menu when you click on the application icon. Instead of getting smaller when it is filled, the dock will slide to accommodate lack of space. Speaking of modern, you now get a devtray applet that will automount removable device just like in gnome.
Of course, Rox filer, which is at the art of the desktop, is fast as hell, nothing to do with nautilus.
Several nice little applications are also available, such as a wallpaper manager, which will change wallpaper at a specified frequencies. You also get an application to set gtk and icon themes... the list goes on, it is very complete.
Haven't tried the full-blow desktop, but (personally) can't stand the Rox filer. We used it on our first and second generation XTerminal/diskless servers, and after trying to explain to students how to use all the separate windows to manage files, we replaced it with Konqueror and Nautilus.
Haven't tried the full-blow desktop, but (personally) can't stand the Rox filer. We used it on our first and second generation XTerminal/diskless servers, and after trying to explain to students how to use all the separate windows to manage files, we replaced it with Konqueror and Nautilus.
That's exactly how Nautilus acts by default and just like Nautilus you can change that option. I used Rox Filer for years and it is great on a low resource system.
Along with XFCE, ROX is probably my favourite Linux interface. Nice and light on system resources without lacking the features that I actually need. The ROX Filer is particularly nice, and not just because I'm an ex-RISC OS user.
To be honest using it doesn't give me the same feeling as RISC OS. I think that's mainly because 95% of the time when I'm interacting with my computer I'm using applications, not the file manager or other desktop environment components. The main thing that made RISC OS special was the consistency and unusual features in its applications. Some of those can be replicated in ROX, drag and drop saving for example, but apps like OpenOffice or Firefox don't have a look and feel anything like a RISC OS app.
It doesn't surprise me that people who are still happy with the RISC OS hardware and software available today chose to stick with the platform. Some elements of the OS look very dated today, but the UI still has some clever features that Linux, Windows and Mac OS X lack. In particular I always found the combination of RISC OS window management, where windows are happy to stay in the background even when you access their menus, and pervasive drag and drop between application, worked very well when creating DTP documents. In my opinion for many tasks it's still very pleasant and productive to use.
"In my humble opinion it is plain ugly, because it lokks so, uhm, dated."
I don't know what you're talking about.
http://users.unet.net.ph/~lars/images/roxshot.png
I don't know what you're talking about.
http://users.unet.net.ph/~lars/images/roxshot.png
Hehehe! He said it's plain Ugly!
Well I don't find it ugly in the screenshot provided in the article: http://images.drobe.co.uk/extra/roxinterview/roxdesktop.png
The only thing ugly that I find ugly is the analog clock as it isn't anti-aliased.
Of course, YMMV.
If you think that's ugly, have a look at a Plan 9 desktop ;-)
http://plan9.bell-labs.com/plan9/screenshot.html
Looks aren't everything.



