Post a Comment
RE[3]: Thanks to all trolls also
I read your first three posts and I have to say, your wording leaves allot to be desired.
Sure, you feel like the man is beating on you, but guess what? I get voted up/down for derogatory and/or off topic comments all the time but you don't hear me bitching about it.
Just because you can act like an ass, doesn't mean you should! ;-)
I just voted you up, no heartfeelings "brodah"
I might be acting like an ass, but what to do here then?
1. They claim to be a OS "NEWS" site. Hell, even /. and digg sometimes have an old "news", what to say about here? But that's fine, they grab from real news site.
2. Abusive moderation. So better close user's moderation and leave it to half-assed thom to do that. Do not claim that the users moderate the comments, and thom, you vote -500, and you know what? you don't worth 500, maybe (1/500).
3. /. + Digg -> 500xOSNEWS. The things that we have here and they don't, well, it's not worth anyway.
So, OSNEWS was once a great site. Now it's just a grey-lemon half-assed moderation news site. Move along, can vote me down, curse, whatever
Make my day!
RE: Thanks to all trolls also
But I wouldn't call OSNews, a news site. As much as I enjoy this site, news are produced by real journalists doing research and investigative reporting. This is more of an aggregated blog with headlines and discussion.
I am aware that there is the occasional review and interview, but even the quality of those tend to be quite amateurish.
WHICH IS OK, since this site claims to be run by hobbyists on their spare time.
Edited 2007-08-26 22:43
Perhaps the maintainers should revise their editorial policy, their goals and such. Do they want to keep on being seen as mini-Slashdot or do they want to be something better?
If the latter, they should exercise more care in choosing their stories. In particular, they should resist the impulse to pick up every other piece of sensationalism they see. I know it makes the hen-house happy (ie. members) but it cheapens the experience.
There are plenty of stories to pick from, and yet they pick a strange mix that is neither here nor there. The comparison to Digg must've hurt, yet it's strangely accurate, because there's no apparent sense of purpose, just some vague guidelines for picking stories.
But I wouldn't call OSNews, a news site
Uh... I can't believe I have to explain thi, but that's what news is, dude. CNN and FOX and ABC don't MAKE news, they report it. That what OSNews does.
news are produced by real journalists doing research and investigative reporting
No, that is precisely not what news is, or rather, should be. News is not "produced"... it is reported.
Nice cherry-picking of my words to dodge the real issue that was being raised.
You are a blog, not a news organization. A news organization sends people daily into the field, conducts interviews, and checks mulitple sources when reporting a story. A news organization conducts thorough and serious testing of products. Look at anandtech if you need a reference on how a review should be done.
Look, I like it here, that's why I visit. But you should own up to what "OSNews" actually is and does.
Don't be ridiculous, no one is dodging the issue. I just think your expectations are a little unrealistic. It is *not* a pre-requisite of news that it must be deep-cover investigative journalism to be news reporting. If that's what you want, go for it, there are plenty of sites that do just that. I am looking at the webpage of my local CBS news... I guess it's a blog, none of the stories appear to be something where the journalist affected the story. BBC too... a blog.
We report news. If you want to call us a blog, go ahead... it's semantics. Call us whatever you want.
A lot of "news sites" use this principle of linking to other websites. If a good article happened to be posted on osnews (original writing, not linking), then it might be linked by other sites as well.
This way, all news sites contribute with potential articles for other sites. Not such a bad system if you ask me
First of all congratulations! OSNews is one of the best news sites for OS and software related topics, especially if you are interested in free software.
However, I do think that OSNews isn't as good as it used to be. This is not the fault of the comment system or OSNews site, but of the OSNews users. The problem is that some people can't follow the moderation guidlines.
They vote things down because they don't agree with the contents, not because it is offensive or off topic but because they disagree as the guidlines suggests.
The start of this thread is a good example of this. It contained no offensive language and saying the comment was off topic was a bit of a stretch. Still it currently is rated -4.
So please, if you come across comments that you don't agree with, don't vote them down. Instead tell us why you don't agree. Who knows, sometimes you might even convince the other person and others that he is wrong. Just voting it down makes the voting system useless for selecting comments worth to read.
We are actually adressing this. Adam has come up with a new moderation system, which will hopefully go live together with v4.
The basic premise of it is that seeing users mod based on (dis)agreement anyway, we might as well be upfront about it. So, the new mod system will have an "agree", "disagree", and "report" button. Comments will not be hidden on the number of "disagree" mods, but based on the number of "reports".
It's quite elegant, actually.
The community ?
I don't think there is a single community at OSn - several IMO .
IMO the topics are broad enough to attract several types of folk .
If there was one community then we'd all participate equally in the different topics posted .
Those commenting on programming languages won't neccessarilty be interested at all in the latest OSX beta build - for example .
IMO the different groups are good & bad - good mix but also sometimes mindless flamewars .
Congrats to 10years to OSn !
Been following you for the last 7 years .
The greater amount of more opinion based & less technical news items I find a bit "sad" .
- but other sites with big topic ranges will have less solid & simpler opinion pieces as well with more & more being glued to the net & generally more discovering open-source & the whole syndication social sites & these Blogs .
With the rise of OSX & Linux , the fanboys & girls have unfortunatly also increased .
But - Happy Birthday & thx to all for maintaining OSn .
I lurked on this site for many years after mandatory registration was required for posting comments. Before hand, anybody could say what they like, no consequences. Even then, I always like this site. But since the registration pre-requisite, the quality of this site has increased one hundred fold.
Today, OSNews is one of, if not the first site I visit and although we still have out trolls, they are nowhere near as disruptive as before*.
Thanks to Eugena, Thom, Adam and anyone I (may) have forgotten for all your hard work making this site one of my favorite stops on the net. I certainly appreciate it. :-)
*(I know I'm the last person to bitch about trolls as I tend to feed 'em. Well, at least one well known one. But what can I say, I just really like baiting the guy ;-)
Hmmm. I just gave you a +1 on that comment earlier in the thread that you are likely upset about. Not because I thought it was a great comment. But because I don't think it deserved to be modded down so. Sure, OSNews is a news amalgamation site. But that and the comments are fine with me.
I used to be critical of the mod system. And I guess I still am. But one really good thing about it is that it gives me a really good way to practice diplomacy while getting good feedback on how I'm doing.
If you'd like to try it, do this:
Make up your mind ahead of time that you are going to say what you mean and not just say stuff that you know will get modded up. Write it out and read it back. Soften some words where they need to be softened. Remove the charged words and replace them with accurate words that don't have emotional connotations. Make sure to acknowledge agreement on points on which you *do* happen to agree. Don't just gloss over any common ground.
At the same time, make your argument regarding the points on which you do *not* agree. Don't overstate it. Don't understate it. Avoid name calling. Show respect to others, even if you don't happen to think they deserve it; it helps your credibility.
Use emoticons. A smiley or a winky in the appropriate place, or a little joke included in your post can make all the difference in how people perceive it.
But for now, sit down, play some nice music, have a cup of tea or cocoa, and relax. And *don't* let the mod system or anything else here upset you. If it does, you are taking things *way* too seriously for your own good. You're supposed to enjoy your time here.
Edited 2007-08-27 02:07
But one really good thing about it is that it gives me a really good way to practice diplomacy while getting good feedback on how I'm doing.
That is something I also really enjoy about OSNews also. I write very little prose for a living, and I know my skill in expressing myself is less than I would like.
But this site is alive with opportunities to practice a little on topics that can incite strong emotions in one direction if I'm careless and in the other if I accurately capture a popular view. And the feedback system here helps me assess how I've done.
P.S.
Please remove my account, I don't want to be with this people!!!!
BYE
csousa, your wish has been granted. I disabled your account.
Welcome to the internet!
Edited 2007-08-27 02:11 UTC
Urm, if you wanted to leave, you could at any time. Having to post about it and try and go out in a bang (more like a whimper) is about the most pathetic thing I can think of. OSNews is a great site with a good community. There are arguments and trolling, but that's mainly a clash of personalities. We're not talking unchecked raving idiocy like YouTube or Digg here.
I don't know how long I've been hanging out here. At least 8 years.
It's managed to stay one of my top visited sites even as my interests drift and wane.
I have no opinion about the moderation system, the editorial content, story selection, or whatever.
Whatever it is you're doing seems to still work and keep me coming back.
Congrats! And no archive.org link? =| http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://osnews.com
random pick: http://web.archive.org/web/20020520101524/www.osnews.com/comment.ph...
not so random pick: http://web.archive.org/web/19980625180609/www.osnews.com/oped/09.97...
Edited 2007-08-27 02:45
The content of the site has been very interesting over the years, and I usually enjoy the site.
The only thing thng which continues to bother me is the constant change w.r.t. browser support. Both Minimo and Opera on the Nokia 770 work fine on the site when the browser ID is hacked, but the OSNews site still seems to consider them second-class citzens, and I see tonight that the Opera version I use on the 770 can no longer post. It could a few days ago, and it has no issues on /. or a dozen other sites.
It's ironic that a site which is supposedly about alternative OSes is the only one I use which seems to have these issues.
Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux armv5tejl; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061130 Minimo/0.016
Happy Birthday OSNews, OSNews give us all a platform to voice our opinions on various topics. Personally I get to keep in touch with what's going around in the TechWorld without any effort on my part. Thanks and Congratulations to the OSNews team for their hard work (most of which is volunteer work).
I remember them well, we were all in awe of an alternative OS that blazed a trail on our PC's that couldn't be touched by Windows or Mac OS. My, how times have changed and not for the better in some instances.
Still, hardware has improved to give the 2 mainstream commercial OS's the impression of being fast. LOL
Every day or so I cannot resist checking the blogs at www.teslamotors.com. Likewise I once installed BeOS on an ancient 333-mhz Pentium-II, and it was remarkably zippy in performance, a clue as to "what could be".
So I AGREE with your assessment of the fundamentality of BeOS failure, as has been remarked arguably due to Microsoft-business-strategy rather than lack of merit. Something-like-or-beyond-BeOS is a Big Shoe Waiting to Drop, somewhere in some secret lab, by analogy to teslamotors vs GM's EV1.
Reading through some of the archives, there was a lot of names there, names that are no longer on the site.
How many of these once very verbal people are no longer around ?
They might have settled with an OS and did not feel the need to discuss others, or they might not actually be around this life anymore.
So pause for a moment and remember those long forgotten people we once argued with.
Where is "Linux is Poo" ?
OSNews is one of a small, select group of tech news sites I keep coming back to again and again, because it gets the mix just right: the site is pleasing in both practical and aesthetic terms, the news is interesting and (for the most part) relevant, and the comments are generally informative.
Many happy returns to OSNews staff, and OSNews users - current and former alike - that have kept me coming back for the past five or so years, on this, your tenth birthday.



