Post a Comment
"Flash is not "open" so this was reverse engineered? "
There is a Flash spec out there. For instance, in OpenOffice, you can export Presentations to a Flash file.
Implementing the spec is easier said than done, I imagine. Radeon finally released the specs for their graphics cards, and it's several hundred pages long.
>There is a Flash spec out there. For instance, in OpenOffice, you can export Presentations to a Flash file.
The problem is that this spec doesn't allow you to create a flash player, only to export files to SWF format.
http://www.adobe.com/licensing/developer/fileformat/faq/#item-1-8
RE[3]: Sounds promising!
I also wonder about the legal state of Flash. I know ActionScript is an ECMAScript implementation, so maybe that's a standard free of patents, but other parts of flash are under patents, AFAIK.
So I wonder if Gnash will be in the same situation as ffmpeg, x264, libmad, etc... which are all FOSS but still can't be distributed by mainstream distributions because of patents.
Anyone know about it?
>What version of flash compatibility are they shooting for?
For now, flash 7.
<sarcasm>Gnash in FreeBSD. But it's a GNU project released under the GPL. Oh, no, can't have that.</sarcasm>
It's good to see that people can see beyond the nonsensical bullshit debates that often arise here. Both the BSD and the GPL are both copyleft licenses,even if the GPL makes it easier and more likely for all branches of the same tree to continue being developed under the same license into the future.
Edited 2007-09-19 01:06
This really sounds promising. I didn't really expect them to get this far. I hope this takes off, so alternative OSes can properly integrate flash in their default installations.
It's a bit strange though how this guy talks about the de-synch'ed sound. No matter how fast your CPU and graphics card are, and how much RAM you have, there is inevitably some flash media that will stutter. Keeping the sound synchronized despite stuttering is definitely a must-have!



