Post a Comment
Well just because someone has a more than capable system doesn't mean they have to run say KDE or GNOME. Just use what you like. Besides, I'm sure more feature rich minimal wms such as fluxbox can run on the same low end hardware as wmii without a problem.
Edited 2007-10-05 14:16
The power of your system doesn't make the code more easy to manage.
I have really learned C reading code from the suckless project (I even have contributed some code later). For an unexperienced programmer it is very easy to understand a piece of software like dwm (or even wmii) in an aftenoon, try to do that with gnome, kde or what not. Just this makes it an essential project to me (OTOH after some time I really find myself more comfortable working with little tools, but that could be a matter of taste...)
I am a wmii user currently, but am thinking of switching to "awesome" (http://awesome.naquadah.org/ - a DWM rewrite), as it seems the only "usable" (=tiling) window manager which has a normal attitude towards antialiasing/composite and such things, and doesn't want the window manager to look like from the 90s.








