Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 25th Mar 2008 16:37 UTC
Fedora Core The beta version of Fedora 9 has been released. It comes with GNOME 2.22, KDE 4.0.2, Firefox 3.0 beta 5, PackageKit, Kernel 2.6.25-rc5, and much more. "The Beta release is the point at which we really want and need the wider community's help with testing. Beta is a point of much greater stability in Fedora's development branch, but some fixes continue to occur to improve usability, performance, and stability."
Order by: Score:
Comment by rodrigocc
by rodrigocc (1) on Tue 25th Mar 2008 17:15 UTC
rodrigocc
Member since:
2008-03-25
Fans: 0

Shouldn't it be Firefox 3 Beta 4 instead of 5 ?

RE: Comment by rodrigocc
by Rahul (3.56) on Tue 25th Mar 2008 18:26 UTC in reply to "Comment by rodrigocc"
Rahul Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 6

Fedora is tracking the development snapshot on a daily basis that is closer to beta 5 actually.

looks like this..
by lqsh (3.24) on Tue 25th Mar 2008 18:11 UTC
lqsh
Member since:
2007-01-01
Fans: 0
Openoffice 3
by pashar (1.56) on Tue 25th Mar 2008 20:27 UTC
pashar
Member since:
2006-07-12
Fans: 0

Too bad Openoffice 3.0 won't be ready for Fedora 9. Well, there is something to expect from Fedora 10.

Redhat 9 to Fedora 9
by thegnome87 (3.71) on Tue 25th Mar 2008 22:35 UTC
thegnome87
Member since:
2007-08-04
Fans: 0

I think it's cool that just a couple of years ago Fedora was just starting out after the discontinuation of Red Hat 9 and now is itself up to its own version 9. As an end user I think this is one distribution that works well and looks good!

RE: Redhat 9 to Fedora 9
by buff (3.84) on Tue 25th Mar 2008 23:20 UTC in reply to "Redhat 9 to Fedora 9"
buff Member since:
2005-11-12
Fans: 1

I agree with you that it works well and performs well. I am hoping that the rough edges of pulseaudio and the audio applications will be smoother with this release. I am using Fedora 8 on an old Athlon 1 Gig Hz chip and it works well. I have a dual boot of Windows XP on the same box and I only logged into it this year to pay the taxes with Turbo Tax since it has issues with Wine still.

I don't know if anyone has noticed this yet but Firefox 3 picks up the GTK theme correctly so the icons are real Gnome icons and not approximated skins. Nice touch thanks to the Mozilla folks working on the Linux build.

Edited 2008-03-25 23:23 UTC

RE[2]: Redhat 9 to Fedora 9
by AdamW (3.44) on Wed 26th Mar 2008 00:43 UTC in reply to "RE: Redhat 9 to Fedora 9"
AdamW Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 13

buff: as many distros are now using PulseAudio and we've all been testing it and contributing patches, it should be a lot smoother in all upcoming distros (F9, Mandriva 2008 Spring, Ubuntu 8.04 etc) than it was in F8.

RE[3]: Redhat 9 to Fedora 9
by buff (3.84) on Wed 26th Mar 2008 01:12 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Redhat 9 to Fedora 9"
buff Member since:
2005-11-12
Fans: 1

That is good to know people are polishing pulseaudio. I like the idea but it annoys me when it dies for unknown reasons and it often times makes a lot of static noise when volume goes to zero between songs. It also has conflicts with the Flash plugin too. I get more crashes now using Flash under pulseaudio. I sent Adobe a bug report.

RE[4]: Redhat 9 to Fedora 9
by Rahul (3.56) on Wed 26th Mar 2008 01:22 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Redhat 9 to Fedora 9"
Rahul Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 6

In Fedora, you might want to try to update to the 0.9.8 which is rawhide currently that fixes a number of issues. For the flash plugin issue, make sure you follow

http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f8/en_US/sn-Desktop.htm...

Not much new this time
by Bitterman (3.16) on Tue 25th Mar 2008 23:02 UTC
Bitterman
Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 0

Fedora 8 had a TON of stuff to play with. This one has a couple but still more system improvements like xstartup being faster, ext4, encryp. things i dont really get to "play" with but welcome additions just the same.
Love this distro for tinkering daily.

RE: Not much new this time
by Rahul (3.56) on Tue 25th Mar 2008 23:26 UTC in reply to "Not much new this time"
Rahul Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 6

Take a closer look. Fedora 9 integrates quite a lot of new features. You left a number of them:

Things where Red Hat developers are leading include:

* PackageKit - http://packagekit.org - A cross distribution front end for managing software.

* FreeIPA - http://freeipa.org/page/Main_Page. A turn key replacement for Active Directory

* A number of GNOME improvements including GVFS. Fedora 8 already had PolicyKit support that has improved with this release.

* NetworkManager 0.7 with a hell lot of new features and system wide static and wireless network management.

* Live CD persistence support

* Pre Upgrade - A live upgrade solution

* Xen Part virt_ops -

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvops

Other than that, there is:

LTSP 5 integration. Probably will include a targeted spin for this.

KDE 4.0.x - Major new revision. A separate KDE spin as before.

Xfce 4.4.2 - Separate spin as part of the release this time.

Firefox 3.0

OpenJDK 6.0

Swfdec, a flash browser plugin

Even more is listed at

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/FeatureList

RE[2]: Not much new this time
by pinky (3.64) on Wed 26th Mar 2008 13:46 UTC in reply to "RE: Not much new this time"
pinky Member since:
2005-07-15
Fans: 2

>Swfdec, a flash browser plugin

Until now i have always used gnash. Are there any rationale behind the decision to choose swfdec over gnash?

RE[3]: Not much new this time
by sakeniwefu (2.96) on Wed 26th Mar 2008 14:02 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Not much new this time"
sakeniwefu Member since:
2008-02-26
Fans: 0

The player is routinely updated to support the latest features demanded by video players, resulting in most (including Youtube, Google Video, Lulu.tv, AOL video, and CNN video) working at any given time.


I can not think of any other legitimate use for Flash other than watching YouTube videos. LGPL-licensed, and works on FreeBSD and Linux.

RE[3]: Not much new this time
by Rahul (3.56) on Wed 26th Mar 2008 14:17 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Not much new this time"
Rahul Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 6

Swfdec uses gstreamer which allows you to install additional plugins easily. It is also provides hooks to make this easier for the end user.

RE[3]: Not much new this time
by bpepple (1.88) on Wed 26th Mar 2008 16:20 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Not much new this time"
bpepple Member since:
2006-01-16
Fans: 1

"Until now i have always used gnash. Are there any rationale behind the decision to choose swfdec over gnash?"

1. swfdec is now included in GNOME (specifically swfdec-gnome).
2. GStreamer-based (though I believe Gnash is also)
3. It has hooks to install missing codecs (via Codeina or Ubuntu's codec installer), which Gnash currently doesn't.

KDE ....
by handy (3.64) on Wed 26th Mar 2008 17:06 UTC
handy
Member since:
2005-07-06
Fans: 0

Just played with FC9 beta today. The Gnome part seems to run very nice. But KDE 4.02 is not workable with me. If plasma crashes, kde refuses to start .... But I doubt I can blame that on Fedora. I really hope at least KDE 4.03 will be in updates when FC9 final is being released.

New GDM
by Sabz (1.32) on Thu 27th Mar 2008 08:35 UTC
Sabz
Member since:
2005-07-07
Fans: 0

New GDM im not to keen on but in time im sure i'll get used to it,