Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 28th Mar 2008 20:37 UTC, submitted by Kaj de Vos
Post a Comment
I'm eager to see where this OS ends up. It looks like it has descent support, though I've never tested it really to see what it's like. As far as from what I've read though it sounds like another BeOS type OS or something to that effect which is all good to me.
As for Grub...
...I've heard of that but don't think I use it, though I've heard the ones in the ground can taste good if prepped right.
I have to give these guys credit. It must be very time intensive and exhausting to have to rewrite everything. It would have to be a real labor of love.
You're right, it would be. Which is why we don't re-write everything!
A large part of the "middle" layers are pretty standard GNU stuff and other Open Source software such as CUPS which has been ported and integrated into Syllable. Most of the drivers are based on Linux, BSD and X.org sources.
We may be crazy, but we're not that crazy!
RE[2]: rewriting the OS
by StephenBeDoper on Sat 29th Mar 2008 15:18 UTC
in reply to "RE: rewriting the OS"
A large part of the "middle" layers are pretty standard GNU stuff
Thank you, I've been looking for a succinct description of that factor for a while now.
It's one of the reasons why I'm still cautiously-enthusiastic about Haiku's chances (and Syllable too, of course).
Ten-fiteen years ago, Be Inc. had to license quite a few technologies - AA-capable font rendering, the blade MP3 encoder, various commercial video codecs (Indeo, Cinepak), etc.
The barriers-to-entry are a lot lower for an alt. OS project today. Rather than paying millions of dollars to license various technologies (or paying more to re-implement them), developers of an alt. OS can just make use of existing open-source stuff like Freetype, FFmpeg, LAME, etc.




