Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th May 2008 17:43 UTC, submitted by Moulinneuf
Mac OS X Apple has updated its Leopard operating system by releasing Mac OS X 10.5.3. "The Mac OS X 10.5.3 Update is recommended for Mac OS X 10.5, 10.5.1, and 10.5.2 Leopard. It includes general operating system improvements that enhance the stability, compatibility, and security of your Mac."
Order by: Score:

10.5.3
by hornett on Wed 28th May 2008 18:42 UTC
hornett
Member since:
2005-09-19

VMWare and Parallels all run slowly post-LGU and since LGU is built into 10.5.3 we cannot simply avoid that update anymore.
The good news now though is that VirtualBox now works smooth as silk. Excellent stuff.

RE: 10.5.3
by evangs on Thu 29th May 2008 06:43 UTC in reply to "10.5.3"
evangs Member since:
2005-07-07

I'm not up to date on my TLAs. What is LGU?

RE: 10.5.3
by mattboy99 on Thu 29th May 2008 08:27 UTC in reply to "10.5.3"
mattboy99 Member since:
2005-07-06

latest graphics update? (i think it was that 10.5.2) graphics update that seemed to make things interesting.

Java 6
by J.R. on Wed 28th May 2008 18:57 UTC
J.R.
Member since:
2007-07-25

Can we use Java 6 in Safari yet?

iSub Support...
by Ralf. on Wed 28th May 2008 19:06 UTC
Ralf.
Member since:
2005-08-13

To all it may concern:

iSub support ist back in 10.5.3!!! Running flawlessly on my iMac G4.

OSx86
by FunkyELF on Wed 28th May 2008 19:41 UTC
FunkyELF
Member since:
2006-07-26

The question now is whether OSX will run better or worse on non-Apple hardware.
Bug fixes in general are good and should help, but updates are also Apple's opportunities to purposely break things.

RE: OSx86
by macUser on Wed 28th May 2008 19:53 UTC in reply to "OSx86"
macUser Member since:
2006-12-15

updates are also Apple's opportunities to purposely break things.


Some would call those security updates...

RE[2]: OSx86
by apoclypse on Wed 28th May 2008 21:43 UTC in reply to "RE: OSx86"
apoclypse Member since:
2007-02-17

Haha. That's funny. I want to see if they fixed the issues with firewire hardware and poor audio performance for these interfaces. There has also been some issues with their video card drivers on certain models. The nvidia drivers for the SR MBP were still pretty weak in Leopard. Lots of things need fixing hopefully this will take care of them.

RE: OSx86
by Kroc on Wed 28th May 2008 21:47 UTC in reply to "OSx86"
Kroc Member since:
2005-11-10

I doubt Apple have a hackintosh that they run just so they can ensure updates break it.

The already broken hackintosh breaks itself. Stop being so paranoid.

RE[2]: OSx86
by mckill on Wed 28th May 2008 21:52 UTC in reply to "RE: OSx86"
mckill Member since:
2007-06-12

it works on hackintoshes assuming you use pc_efi and assuming you're not dumb enough to run it on completely non-standard hardware that doesnt even come close to resembling a real mac.

'AppleIntelCPUManager.kext' will likely panic your system once it gets installed and automatically loads itself as usual. if you don't remove it before it gets loaded your system will die.

RE: OSx86
by Phloptical on Thu 29th May 2008 03:12 UTC in reply to "OSx86"
Phloptical Member since:
2006-10-10

I suspect that your question will call out the legions of fanboys who will curse you and your future generations for daring to install OS X on non-Steve Jobs approved hardware. That would be part and parcel to "having your cake, and eating it too" which we all know Apple is completely against.

Although, I am interested in knowing the answer myself....not that I'm planning to put one together. You know...it's just out of curiosity.

RE[2]: OSx86
by aesiamun on Thu 29th May 2008 04:28 UTC in reply to "RE: OSx86"
aesiamun Member since:
2005-06-29

It runs just fine ;)

AMD Hackintosh user
by enzobelmont on Wed 28th May 2008 22:12 UTC
enzobelmont
Member since:
2006-11-08

i will wait for some weeks before i can update my hachintosh... apple should reconsider the option to develop MacOS for non apple hardware users.

i could wipe vista in three years.

sorry my fraking english.

RE: AMD Hackintosh user
by kaiwai on Wed 28th May 2008 22:23 UTC in reply to "AMD Hackintosh user"
kaiwai Member since:
2005-07-06

i will wait for some weeks before i can update my hachintosh... apple should reconsider the option to develop MacOS for non apple hardware users.


Its not going to happen - and personally, I think you would be better off giving Ubuntu or OpenSolaris 2008.5 a go. Mac OS X will always be wed to the hardware because that is what gives Apple the ability to develop rapidly and not have to have a huge number of developers to test and trace the numerous possible hardware related bugs that comes with the model used in the Wintel world.

v RE: AMD Hackintosh user
by rockwell on Thu 29th May 2008 01:28 UTC in reply to "AMD Hackintosh user"
RE[2]: AMD Hackintosh user
by enzobelmont on Thu 29th May 2008 07:02 UTC in reply to "RE: AMD Hackintosh user"
enzobelmont Member since:
2006-11-08

here's my laptop disk setup:

/partition1 --> Windows XP Pro
/partition2 --> Gentoo Linux
/partition3 --> MacOS 10.5.2
/partition4 --> Fat32 Personal Data
/partition5 --> Linux Swap

as you can see these three OSes live happy

Partition1 was originally Vista's one.
As you can see Vista is eclipsing itself.

it has its own category: CrapWare.

what's the point of you anger to me?
I'm just pointing that MacOS is a FAR BETTER operative system than Windows Vista, in every category.

Let me note this: i'm not an apple fanboy.

My main os is gentoo, but i like to boot mac os at least a day in week to test its apps.

RE[3]: AMD Hackintosh user
by rockwell on Thu 29th May 2008 20:32 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: AMD Hackintosh user"
rockwell Member since:
2005-09-13

So ... because you multiple partitions on your hard drive with various OS's installed ... therefore Vista is "crapware?"

Stellar logic, that.

Edited 2008-05-29 20:32 UTC

RE[4]: AMD Hackintosh user
by wakeupneo on Fri 30th May 2008 03:46 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: AMD Hackintosh user"
wakeupneo Member since:
2005-07-06

So ... because you multiple partitions on your hard drive with various OS's installed ... therefore Vista is "crapware?"


..actually, I think the fact that Vista was removed and replaced with XP declared that quite loudly.

RE[5]: AMD Hackintosh user
by rockwell on Fri 30th May 2008 18:22 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: AMD Hackintosh user"
rockwell Member since:
2005-09-13

Please explain how this one retard's hatred of Vista makes Vista "Crapware" across the board.

bousozoku
Member since:
2006-01-23

I'm glad to have this on my machine now. It only took 6 months for Apple to get a stable version going. (At least, I hope it's stable.) People shouldn't complain about Ubuntu's strict release schedule hurting 8.04 when Apple took around 2.5 years to get Leopard to this point and they didn't give it away.

Performance is somewhat improved, though I haven't run it long enough to get a good feel for it. Some small, annoying bugs have been fixed and hopefully, some larger bugs like the wireless support have been put to bed for the rest of Leopard.

I'm thankful that they've updated RAW file support for digital SLRs but they're woefully behind on that. Of course, mobile phones are in a similar situation of being supported.

Thanks, Apple. I love the extended (and retail) beta period.

Updated to 10.5.3
by jace78 on Thu 29th May 2008 01:21 UTC
jace78
Member since:
2005-07-06

I just updated my Black 2.2 ghz intel core duo MacBook with 2gb ram to 10.5.3, and everything is working fine.

Thanks Apple.

YAY! my biggest bug is fixed
by Lion on Thu 29th May 2008 07:30 UTC
Lion
Member since:
2007-03-22

On my G4 mac mini, my entire screen would flick upside-down for a fraction of a second whenever I exited any app, and 10.5.3 fixes it ;)
About time, but better late than never.

RE: YAY! my biggest bug is fixed
by bousozoku on Thu 29th May 2008 07:46 UTC in reply to "YAY! my biggest bug is fixed"
bousozoku Member since:
2006-01-23

On my G4 mac mini, my entire screen would flick upside-down for a fraction of a second whenever I exited any app, and 10.5.3 fixes it ;)
About time, but better late than never.


Don't worry, they messed up something else to fix that.

I had a few applications running and at some point, all of the menu bar items of all the application menus decided to be displayed at once. It even stayed long enough to get a screen shot of it.

I'm just happy it wasn't anything worse.

Diablo 2 LoD
by xushi on Fri 30th May 2008 09:39 UTC
xushi
Member since:
2005-08-29

Be warned,

10.5.3 breaks Diablo 2 LoD... it fails to start. If only i knew before i upgraded.

sloppy?
by nighty5 on Fri 30th May 2008 14:14 UTC
nighty5
Member since:
2005-12-18

I bought my mum her first Mac for Xmas, and while 'selling it hard' to my dear mother she wasn't too impressed that 10.5.2 completely broke printer support. It took around 2 weeks for a minor update to come down the line.

And now I just heard 10.5.3 brakes Diablo 2, probably among other applications.

I suggest people don't "install" the update for at least a couple of weeks until all the known critical bugs in the update are well understood.

My 2 cents!

RE: sloppy?
by bousozoku on Fri 30th May 2008 17:12 UTC in reply to "sloppy?"
bousozoku Member since:
2006-01-23

I bought my mum her first Mac for Xmas, and while 'selling it hard' to my dear mother she wasn't too impressed that 10.5.2 completely broke printer support. It took around 2 weeks for a minor update to come down the line.

And now I just heard 10.5.3 brakes Diablo 2, probably among other applications.

I suggest people don't "install" the update for at least a couple of weeks until all the known critical bugs in the update are well understood.

My 2 cents!


It's always a good idea to wait, unless you've been waiting for some things to be fixed, of course.

It seems odd that Blizzard games are always in the middle of the fixes. Everything else I've played seems fine. Other third party software seems okay, but then, I had to upgrade a lot because they would not run with Leopard.