Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 5th Jul 2008 18:52 UTC, submitted by martini
OS/2 and eComStation eComStation 2.0 RC5 is available for download for users with Software Subscriptions Services subscription. For those who don't know, eComStation is the next evolution of the OS/2 operating system.
Order by: Score:
eComStation myths
by e-co on Sun 6th Jul 2008 09:31 UTC
e-co
Member since:
2006-01-03

Here is the collection of eComStation myths:
http://ecomstation.ru/myths

Reply Score: 1

RE: eComStation myths
by TLZ_ on Sun 6th Jul 2008 10:25 UTC in reply to "eComStation myths"
TLZ_ Member since:
2007-02-05

"1. eComStation is ugly.

eComStation has powerful user interface, object oriented desktop. Users can change colors and icons. Visit the gallery of eComStation screenshots."

I visited the gallery and it *is* ugly! Throwing some Aqua-like icons and having ugly buttons and weird gradients won't make anything pretty.

Win9X is more pretty than this actually, at least it looks consistent.

Reply Score: 3

RE[2]: eComStation myths
by Laurence on Sun 6th Jul 2008 14:31 UTC in reply to "RE: eComStation myths"
Laurence Member since:
2007-03-26

It's ugly by todays standards, but back when OS/2 was first released, the interface was pretty damn sexy compared to the competition.

Reply Score: 3

RE[2]: eComStation myths
by biffuz on Sun 6th Jul 2008 18:59 UTC in reply to "RE: eComStation myths"
biffuz Member since:
2006-03-27

Definitively. Even Vista is nicer than those masterpieces of ugliness.

Reply Score: 2

RE[2]: eComStation myths
by rcsteiner on Mon 7th Jul 2008 17:09 UTC in reply to "RE: eComStation myths"
rcsteiner Member since:
2005-07-12

You know the state of the OS hobbyist community has gone downhill when flashy icons and windowing effects make a larger impression than the actual functionality of a desktop.

The WPS is still one of the best when it comes to raw usefulness. A new paint job doesn't make a desktop any more useful -- all it does is make the potholes look pretty.

Reply Score: 3

RE[3]: eComStation myths
by BallmerKnowsBest on Tue 8th Jul 2008 02:34 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: eComStation myths"
BallmerKnowsBest Member since:
2008-06-02

The WPS is still one of the best when it comes to raw usefulness. A new paint job doesn't make a desktop any more useful -- all it does is make the potholes look pretty.


++

Or as Jean-Louis Gassee put it, "At the risk of sounding ageist, sexist, and French: you can dress Grandma up in a multimedia mini-skirt and take her out to a night club, but that still doesn't mean she's going to score."

Reply Score: 2

what's the point?
by unclefester on Sun 6th Jul 2008 11:59 UTC
unclefester
Member since:
2007-01-13

An OS that hasn't really been updated for over 10 years. Virtually no applications. 32 bit only. Very few drivers. Extremely expensive to purchase. What is the point unless you have critical OS/2 software?

Reply Score: 1

RE: what's the point?
by Ford Prefect on Mon 7th Jul 2008 00:32 UTC in reply to "what's the point?"
Ford Prefect Member since:
2006-01-16

You already said it.

Reply Score: 5

RE: what's the point?
by rcsteiner on Mon 7th Jul 2008 17:03 UTC in reply to "what's the point?"
rcsteiner Member since:
2005-07-12

Some of us aren't willing to settle for the creeping ABIs and the maze of constantly morphing desktop paradigms that Linux folks are seemingly willing to put up with? :-)

I've used Linux in parallel with OS/2 since the early 90's (OS/2 2.0 and SLS 0.99), and there are several reasons why my main desktop is still OS/2. Stability of a desktop installation over time is a huge part of it -- I'm sick and tired of having to refresh my base distro every 2-3 years.

Of course, as an existing OS/2 user the fee for an eCS license isn't that bad. Not that my main desktop runs eCS, mind you. That's a secondary desktop license for me. My primary is Warp 4 FP 15.

Edited 2008-07-07 17:06 UTC

Reply Score: 2

Still better than Linux
by rogerufo on Mon 7th Jul 2008 16:32 UTC
rogerufo
Member since:
2007-04-28

Personally, I prefer eComstation over Linux. I have tried three recent linux distros, and none of them ( Ubuntu, Fedora, or OpenSuse ) is able to recognize my monitor and configure itself properly. With eComstation this is not a problem. I can't use linux in its current state.

Reply Score: 1