Post a Comment
I looked at the price and weird processor and my only reaction was a shrug. However, looking at the site and the everything on a USB key philosophy of the device, I could see it (or this approach) going over very well in schools.....if there is a way to back up the USB key anyways.
I am surprised someone else hasn't done that already (or maybe they have?)
The price looks a little steep indeed and the processor may seem weird to you but it isn't to me and hasn't been for more than a year. You can expect longer battery life and less heat, two things that are very important in mobile devices.
I'll be looking at this Gdium and try to get one to test my Slackware port, but I wonder if it's possible to use an internal solid state drive if you want to. USB keys can be backed up much easier and it will also be much better to replace the device with another one when it's broken without opening the case.
WTF?
Dont get me wrong, I like the idea of yet another UMPC, and I like the idea that Mandriva is providing the OS, but can't I already set up a system based on virtually any popular Linux distro such that the user's home directory is on the user's personal USB key and the OS itself is on a write-protected hard drive?
I think this is a second foray for Mandriva into the low-cost laptop arena. Intel Classmate PC is already using Mandriva for its OS.
BTW, does anybody have a good review of the Classmate PC especially about the ease-of-use of the OS and the selection of software that comes with it?
Edited 2008-07-18 23:09 UTC
These are the 2 reviews that I could find related to Mandriva and Classmate PC:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070708-abrief-look-at-the-in...
http://www.linux.com/articles/62230
I like the idea of G-Key (extension of Mandriva Flash?). But the price seems to be on the higher end -- 400 Euros (~630$).
Well, the Classmate is a different thing really - you can't just go out and buy one, they're only available in large quantities to large-scale buyers. The Gdium is at least partly a consumer market product.
As the story says, pricing isn't finalized and may vary from territory to territory - the U.S. price won't necessarily be the exact equivalent of the European price. But more details on that will come along soon enough I think.
Well for starters there are things like native flash support. You won't find that on MIPS yet. You can insert any number of other programs that will not compile for the architecture. Basically the same problems that the PPC linux folks have, just an even more obscure platform on the desktop. I'll give you that a lot of things will work and will work just fine, but tell me what is the benefit of the platform? As it is now I see no compelling reason to buy this over an x86 based offering.
"Each user owns its G-Key and may plug it in any Gdium. The user will then retrieve its personal environment, without leaving any traces on the foreign computer."
Imagine such netbooks in the classrooms or even in the companies! This gives more freedom and flexibility. The computer is there but without the crap leaved from the previous user. For example one educational organization could buy only 100 GDiums and 500 G-keys without the other hardware and in one or two classrooms could give different courses.
Or college boys and girls could share one netbook.
And a very useful application - buy one Gdium and two G-keys, one for you and one for the rest of the family 
> (sorry, I don't participate in the hype of calling them netbooks or whatever)
> ...
> will be a netbook with
rotfl
Besides, netbook is (was?) a Psion machine, actually quite ahead of those things by the time...
http://www.geek.com/geek-review-psion-netbook/
It just didn't have an x86.
MIPs has the same problem as ARM. You are tied to repositories hosted by the UMPC manufacturer unless you are very comfortable "rolling your own". Asus had the same problem with the Eee. The customized Xandros OS had special repositories for the Eee pc and it wasn't very extensive. Many linux programs customers wanted were not available. The good news for Eee users is the laptop has an X86 processor. There are many different distos customized for the Eee now. Ubuntu even made a custom distro just for this category. Care to bet how many different distros will be available 9 months from now for a UMPC using a MIPs processor? I won't bet with my hard earned money.
mandriva work fine for the eee too....
mandriva will surely say how much time it suppose to support the machine...
anyway, any netbook don't have a very long life... cpu is not powerfull... so after a couple of year some software will work slowy
another compagny use "special" cpu
jisus
http://vanderled.com/onlinestore/product_info.php/cPath/49_48_58/pr...
jisus v2 use a via c7... it's suppose to do some test to see if the via nano could be used
jisus v3 use atom
if the jisus cpu is enougt powerfull and have good automony... that could be a great machine
I'll bet there will be a Ubuntu that runs on it in 9 month's time especially as Canonical will want to support this processor to gain a foothold in China.
You may think x86 is something special. Well, I can tell you it's not. The only reason x86 is so large nowadays is because of Intel, the Microsoft Windows operating system tied to x86 processors (it isn't that prevalent on Itanium either) and the high cost of RISC/UNIX hardware back in the day.
I have almost the same applications running on my Loongson MIPS system as those on my x86, PPC and SPARC systems. The only difference is the closed source GNU/Linux stuff that's tied to x86, which isn't that important for the device to function and can be accommodated for with e.g. a Linux/x86 emulation layer such as provided by QEMU.
I wonder what Mandriva have done in that respect.
Of late Mandriva is an excellent distro: polished, stable, fast...
So it is ideal for small laptops, IMO. Definitely better than Xandros. Of all the ones I have tried it is also the only one which installs a laptop kernel:
http://justingill.com/blog/2008/03/21/update-mandriva-20081rc2/
Just to catch you early - you may notice 2009 doesn't. That doesn't mean anything's wrong - we just don't have a laptop kernel any more (post-2008.1). There was no longer any need for a separate kernel, as most differences between it and the desktop kernel disappeared, and the one remaining one (USB suspend support) could safely be enabled in the desktop kernel. So, 2009 will have no laptop kernel.
Going MIPS in china may be economically correct but in north america, I think it is pure suicide. I'm pretty sure when you look now at all the EeePC sold in north america, a big part of them is running Windows XP. I work in a computer store and I sold two time Linux based EeePC. The two time the client came back with it, wanting us to install XP. This thing, running on a MIPS processor can't run Windows XP. Maybe Windows NT4 which if I remember well got a port. But what is it possible to do with a 10 years+ old OS and no program to run onto it? Like every other here I'm saying that a MIPS processor is a vendor lock-in for the Linux distributions (maybe except in china were its more used).
MIPS seems as good a choice of CPU platform as any. While you may have had a couple of Linux-hating customers who wanted Windows on their eee's, most people just plain don't care. You see, devices like this aren't really laptops in the conventional sense. Rather they are high-end PDAs, much like the old Psion gear or the early laptop-style PDAs from HP. Most people just want a device that they can surf the web, check e-mail and keep their schedule on. The underlying OS isn't important to those people.
"Surf the web" implies that this device can run flash and java. Is that the case?





.