Linked by David Adams on Thu 13th Nov 2008 16:02 UTC
Privacy, Security, Encryption McColo Corp, an internet service provider that has been confirmed to be the provider of choice to a rogue's gallery of unsavory clients, has been cut off by its backbone providers, cutting the world's total volume of spam by as much as 75%. Sadly, these people will undoubtedly be able to find other service eventually. But enjoy the respite while it lasts.
Order by: Score:

Gmail...
by Tuishimi on Thu 13th Nov 2008 16:50 UTC
Tuishimi
Member since:
2005-07-06

My gmail spam folder has dropped to about 1/4 of the total spam... that's still a lot of spam. In two days the box went from 0 to 50 messages which isn't bad at all - I rarely use that account too. But I have also noticed that spamsieve is not working as hard too for my other accounts. ;)

Well done!
by irbis on Thu 13th Nov 2008 20:35 UTC
irbis
Member since:
2005-07-08

This is great news. I hope other service providers, and also national and international legislators all around the world, have enough goodwill to follow suite and do more to stop spammers.

Nobody needs spam, not even those morons trusting spam and buying the rubbish advertised there. Spammers themselves are simply criminals who should be punished and stopped from continuing their crimes.

RE: Well done!
by shykid on Fri 14th Nov 2008 17:19 UTC in reply to "Well done!"
shykid Member since:
2007-02-22

Thing is, at one point there were--and still are if things haven't changed much--quite a few hosting businesses that cater to this type of clientele specifically (although usually not explicitly for obvious reasons). They know exactly what's going on but turn a blind eye to it.

Hopefully more of them will get cut off at the backbone. That combined with legislation is probably the best way to stop spammers.

Woo Hoo!
by leech on Fri 14th Nov 2008 02:27 UTC
leech
Member since:
2006-01-10

Anything to make my job as an email administrator easier, is very welcome.

Spammers go to that special hell that is reserved for child molesters and people who talk in the theater.

RE: Woo Hoo!
by Doc Pain on Sat 15th Nov 2008 20:55 UTC in reply to "Woo Hoo!"
Doc Pain Member since:
2006-10-08

Spammers go to that special hell that is reserved for child molesters and people who talk in the theater.


I'm pretty sure all the "Misters I-have-no-virus" who run spam servers on their desktop machines without knowing it (why bother anyway, "I don't care.") will enjoy their stay in that special hell - they deserve it. :-)

But for the feeling that there's justice even within this world we're living in at the moment, actions should be taken to give legislature the proper means to punish spammers (detention fees, takeaway of their computers, even goto jail).

One spammer less on the Internet is very welcome, but not enough. Still, more than 90% of the mail transferred is spam. It's obvious why it is, isn't it?

Threshold
by sbergman27 on Sat 15th Nov 2008 03:18 UTC
sbergman27
Member since:
2005-07-24

This is valuable information. When an ISP crosses the 75% of world spam line, someone notices and shuts them down. In the future, spamming ISPs should take care to remain at 74% or below.

RE: Threshold
by hollovoid on Sat 15th Nov 2008 13:41 UTC in reply to "Threshold"
hollovoid Member since:
2005-09-21

hahaha I doubt thats a threshold they use, I think personally they should keep it at under 1%, and they have to lose an appendage every time it rises over that.

Seems fair to me!

RE[2]: Threshold
by sbergman27 on Sat 15th Nov 2008 21:26 UTC in reply to "RE: Threshold"
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

they should keep it at under 1%, and they have to lose an appendage every time it rises over that.

With 5 to choose from, which one first?

RE[3]: Threshold
by hollovoid on Sat 15th Nov 2008 23:07 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Threshold"
hollovoid Member since:
2005-09-21

Thats when we leave it up to chance, have a wheel of fortune type setup, where it lands.. you lose.

Comment by BSDfan
by BSDfan on Sat 15th Nov 2008 11:37 UTC
BSDfan
Member since:
2007-03-14

But enjoy the respite?

Engrish funny.

RE: Comment by BSDfan
by StephenBeDoper on Sat 15th Nov 2008 19:03 UTC in reply to "Comment by BSDfan"
StephenBeDoper Member since:
2005-07-06

Out source writing article to Asia quality problems cause?

RE: Comment by BSDfan
by WebDragon on Mon 17th Nov 2008 21:51 UTC in reply to "Comment by BSDfan"
WebDragon Member since:
2007-02-21

"enjoy the respite" is actually correct english phrasing. "respite" is equivalent to "reprieve" (a (temporary) relief from harm or discomfort) or "suspension" (an interruption in the intensity or amount of something) in this case.

Spammers
by fejack on Mon 17th Nov 2008 15:53 UTC
fejack
Member since:
2006-06-12

I know we are living in civilized countries, but Spammers should be beaten up and left an inch close to death.