Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Jan 2009 21:27 UTC
Apple This week, 25 years ago, a company aired an advertisement that would cement that company's name into the minds of many. It was an advertisement about individuality versus conformism, about light versus dark, about new versus established. It was the most expensive advertisement of its time, and yet, it didn't even show the product it was trying to sell. After the ad was over, all we knew was that something called "Macintosh" was going to show us how 1984 wouldn't be like 1984.
Order by: Score:
Wow
by giraffe on Fri 23rd Jan 2009 21:45 UTC
giraffe
Member since:
2006-10-13

i'd forgotten how good that commercial was. I remember drooling with envy over my friends mac. in 1985. Playing zork was a sublime experience.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Wow
by JLF65 on Mon 26th Jan 2009 08:37 UTC in reply to "Wow"
JLF65 Member since:
2005-07-06

I remember drooling with envy over my friends mac. in 1985. Playing zork was a sublime experience.


64 KB of RAM, a 400 KB floppy, a tiny B&W display, and an OS barely better than DOS. Sorry - wasn't impressed at all. The Amiga, release two months after the Mac, had 256 KB of RAM (expandable to 512 KB), an 880 KB floppy, a large color display, and an OS that wasn't equaled until 1995... for less money than the Mac. Now THAT had me drooling. In 1985. ;)

Reply Score: 2

Futurama
by Moredhas on Fri 23rd Jan 2009 21:51 UTC
Moredhas
Member since:
2008-04-10

Well, now I guess I finally get that Planet Express ad in Futurama. Having been born in 88, I kind of missed the boat for that commercial ;)

Reply Score: 4

RE: Futurama
by StephenBeDoper on Sat 24th Jan 2009 02:47 UTC in reply to "Futurama"
StephenBeDoper Member since:
2005-07-06

Ha, yeah - the Futurama parody is great.

"Our enemies will be eaten by squirrels!"

Reply Score: 2

It's too bad ...
by WorknMan on Fri 23rd Jan 2009 22:06 UTC
WorknMan
Member since:
2005-11-13

That they mistook who their competitor really has. They had their eye on IBM, but got blindsided by Microsoft.

Reply Score: 4

RE: It's too bad
by Sabon on Fri 23rd Jan 2009 23:08 UTC
Sabon
Member since:
2005-07-06

"That they mistook who their competitor really has. They had their eye on IBM, but got blindsided by Microsoft."

IBM was clueless too. They thought it was all about the hardware. Turns out they were mostly wrong.

Sure PC companies have made money. But nothing like Microsoft who only has to worry about packaging software, not building computers. Good thing considering the problems they've had with the 360.

Reply Score: 4

Fact fans
by AdamW on Fri 23rd Jan 2009 23:19 UTC
AdamW
Member since:
2005-07-06

Fact fans - this isn't that ad's 25th birthday at all. That was 15th December 2008. It was aired at one o'clock in the morning on KMVT, Channel 11 in Twin Falls, Idaho on 15th December 1983, in order to be eligible for ad awards. See http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12/15/1984_ad_anniversary/ for details.

Reply Score: 4

geek alert
by buff on Sat 24th Jan 2009 00:07 UTC
buff
Member since:
2005-11-12

Fact fans - this isn't that ad's 25th birthday at all. That was 15th December 2008. It was aired at one o'clock in the morning on KMVT, Channel 11 in Twin Falls, Idaho on 15th December 1983, in order to be eligible for ad awards. See http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12/15/1984_ad_anniversary/ for details.

Geek alert! Geek alert! Shields up!

Reply Score: 7

RE: geek alert
by AdamW on Sat 24th Jan 2009 00:28 UTC in reply to "geek alert"
AdamW Member since:
2005-07-06

Heh, I just remembered reading the Reg story last year. ;)

Reply Score: 2

Conformity
by JMcCarthy on Sat 24th Jan 2009 01:53 UTC
JMcCarthy
Member since:
2005-08-12

For the anti-conformist image they conjure they sure are conformist. You can't get much more conformity than you can with a Mac. ;)

Not that conformity is necessarily bad, for them it's a major +.

Edited 2009-01-24 01:54 UTC

Reply Score: 7

RE: Conformity
by Moredhas on Sat 24th Jan 2009 03:15 UTC in reply to "Conformity"
Moredhas Member since:
2008-04-10

But of COURSE mac users are nonconformists! Haven't you ever heard the saying "all you nonconformists are all alike"? I jest, of course. The real nonconformists are using Linux, but we're all going to have to move to Syllable if Linux's popularity keeps growing.

Reply Score: 4

Times
by Buck on Sat 24th Jan 2009 09:55 UTC
Buck
Member since:
2005-06-29

Times change, people change. The 1984 would never work in today's cynical hasty world. So the Get a Mac commercials are actually more fitting. And by the way, show me any recent computer industry commercial that rivals either 1984 or Get a Mac in terms of impact. There are just none.

Also for those who haven't seen it, here's a treat:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oGFogwcx-E

Reply Score: 4

It was in fact a disaster
by alcibiades on Sat 24th Jan 2009 10:33 UTC
alcibiades
Member since:
2005-10-12

It was in fact a disaster. The commercial embodied the Cupertino mindset that confined Apple to a locked in niche. It was the spirit of the disaster that Apple became in the following decade. Jobs was creator, nemesis and then savior, all in this same limited, limiting and restricted culture, and its all down to the cultural spirit embodied in this view of Apple and its users as beleagured small dissenting and to some degree victimized minorities.

Reply Score: 3

and then there was the "other" add
by siraf72 on Sat 24th Jan 2009 12:55 UTC
siraf72
Member since:
2006-02-22

the same company produced this gem. A lesson for budding advertisers, try not to insult the people you are selling to ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYP1Tjgt1Ao

Reply Score: 2

Is it me ..
by de_wizze on Sun 25th Jan 2009 11:53 UTC
de_wizze
Member since:
2005-10-31

.. or do current MacWorld Keynotes remind you of that commercial its self?

Reply Score: 4

Comment by memson
by memson on Mon 26th Jan 2009 17:36 UTC
memson
Member since:
2006-01-01

Wasn't this also the release date of the Mac? Every source under the sun says 24th Jan 1984 was the Mac's release date. I was 10. Litterally. It's my Birthday too :-))

Reply Score: 2