Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 1st May 2009 20:39 UTC, submitted by SReilly
Apple Apple's recent hiring spree of chip designers reveals the company may be about to exert even more control over the components that go into its products. The company may go so far as manufacturing computer processors in-house, according to The Wall Street Journal, which cites only anonymous sources to bolster its claim that the internally designed chips will appear in products no sooner than 2010.
Order by: Score:

Not CPU's, other chips.
by gustl on Fri 1st May 2009 20:55 UTC
gustl
Member since:
2006-01-19

The will not make CPU's that is way too much effort for way too little gain.

But northbridge, southbritge, sound (or all-in-one) they probably will make.

This would also put them into a position to get rid of the more broadly sold "hackintosh" machines, simply because no driver or firmware exists for "commonplace hardware".

RE: Not CPU's, other chips.
by Piranha on Fri 1st May 2009 21:43 UTC in reply to "Not CPU's, other chips."
Piranha Member since:
2008-06-24

I don't think they're not going to want to close it off entirely. Bootcamp? Do they really want to write up multiple drivers for multiple operating systems? What about people who use other operating systems on their computer?

Judging by what they do on the iPod, I could see them locking out any other operating systems, but I think it's expected by most people that multiple operating systems are allowed on a computer and they wouldn't do that. Even though I use (and like) OSx itself, I wouldn't buy under the assumption I couldn't put any operating system on my computer. Perhaps they'll allow certain parts of the hardware to run under ANY operating system, but 'secret' parts of hardware will only run under OSx, like the PS3?

Who knows, time will tell I guess...

RE[2]: Not CPU's, other chips.
by xiaokj on Fri 1st May 2009 21:51 UTC in reply to "RE: Not CPU's, other chips."
xiaokj Member since:
2005-06-30

Judging by what they do on the iPod, I could see them locking out any other operating systems, but I think it's expected by most people that multiple operating systems are allowed on a computer and they wouldn't do that.


I beg to differ. To the masses, the computer is just another tool with just one interface. We are hideously in the minority. Maybe hence it is why Steve still fights against third parties.

I think the more likely...
by mrhasbean on Sat 2nd May 2009 00:17 UTC
mrhasbean
Member since:
2006-04-03

...scenario is that they are:

a) going to build custom chips the curb the Hackintosh market (as previously stated)

and / or

b) going to build custom chips for upcoming devices in order to be able to patent the hell out of an idea following the recent patent suits against them.

Will be interesting to follow...

RE: I think the more likely...
by Liquidator on Sat 2nd May 2009 05:42 UTC in reply to "I think the more likely..."
Liquidator Member since:
2007-03-04

Maybe they're going to create a chip that will be hardly reproduceable and that will ship with every Mac. Then the next OS X will require this chip on your computer to install and to "validate".

RE[2]: I think the more likely...
by Tuishimi on Sat 2nd May 2009 06:00 UTC in reply to "RE: I think the more likely..."
Tuishimi Member since:
2005-07-06

Yeah, that seems likely. Ah well, so much for buying a Psystar. :/

New 68k-based Macs, anyone?
by SamuraiCrow on Sun 3rd May 2009 00:44 UTC
SamuraiCrow
Member since:
2005-11-19

Sorry I couldn't resist.

Even CPUs are possible...
by dnm240 on Mon 4th May 2009 13:31 UTC
dnm240
Member since:
2008-06-10

I think that despite the effort involved, it IS possible that they will make CPUs. They already bought PA semi, which made a functioning CPU, so that gives them a head start. I wouldn't go so far as to say that it is likely, but definitely possible.

Remember that these CPUs may not be destined for desktop/laptop machines. Other possible uses include phones, netbooks, wireless routers, music players, dvr/multimedia products, and even softserve ice cream machines! ;-)

arm soc's
by puenktchen on Mon 4th May 2009 15:31 UTC
puenktchen
Member since:
2007-07-27

they'll probably design a range of soc's tailored for their ipods, iphones, ipads & inotes or whatever. especially chips which have a bit more oomp than the stuff offered on the open market for low powered devices but far less power than the notebook chipsets. maybe multicore design which can be used by sno leopards technologies (and apps which have been programmed using them). but they certainly won't manufacture them.

note to myself: rtfa first.

Edited 2009-05-04 15:33 UTC

RE: arm soc's
by fretinator on Mon 4th May 2009 15:49 UTC in reply to "arm soc's"
fretinator Member since:
2005-07-06

They could come in handy in the winter. ;}

RE[2]: arm soc's
by puenktchen on Mon 4th May 2009 19:06 UTC in reply to "RE: arm soc's"
puenktchen Member since:
2007-07-27

rofl!