Post a Comment
Yes, I don't imagine that, say, Amazon relishes the idea of an Mac OS tablet PC that can do e-books better than the Kindle, the e-books being supplied by Google. Quite hard to see how folks sitting on the same boards could keep all that separate, but what do I know. A strict separation does sound a good idea even if only to ensure that folks stay well above suspicion.
They are barred from conflict of interest meetings.
However, I wouldn't blink an eye if Schmidt were told to resign.
Although I see the links between the two, I do think the accusations is a stretch of the imagination. The equivalence of their accusations would be me to claim that because there are directors on different software companies, they all refuse to support Linux, Conclusion: they are working with Microsoft to prop up their monopoly in the operating system business.
I support the need for oversight but at the same time I think that one needs to realise that there are 'investigations' that go on all the time based on complaints raised. This complaint may or may not even be valid - just like when an SEC does an investigation and find there is nothing untoward taken place in the financial reporting.
So I think people need to stand back, take a deep breath and realise that this is only an investigation - innocent till proven guilty.




