Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 5th May 2009 17:08 UTC, submitted by Moulinneuf
Legal The Federal Trade Commission in the United States has started an inquiry into the close ties between the boards of Apple and Google. They are wondering if the close ties constitute a violation of antitrust laws now that the two companies are increasingly participating in the same markets.
Order by: Score:
to the EU..
by poundsmack on Tue 5th May 2009 17:38 UTC
poundsmack
Member since:
2005-07-13

want to go after someone that might actually need some regulation before they get out of control? Might want to look here.

Reply Score: 2

RE: to the EU..
by stestagg on Tue 5th May 2009 20:29 UTC in reply to "to the EU.."
stestagg Member since:
2006-06-03

So, the people they are currently 'going after' are beyond control now?? ;)

Reply Score: 4

Comment by moleskine
by moleskine on Tue 5th May 2009 19:22 UTC
moleskine
Member since:
2005-11-05

Yes, I don't imagine that, say, Amazon relishes the idea of an Mac OS tablet PC that can do e-books better than the Kindle, the e-books being supplied by Google. Quite hard to see how folks sitting on the same boards could keep all that separate, but what do I know. A strict separation does sound a good idea even if only to ensure that folks stay well above suspicion.

Reply Score: 2

RE: Comment by moleskine
by tyrione on Tue 5th May 2009 19:40 UTC in reply to "Comment by moleskine"
tyrione Member since:
2005-11-21

Yes, I don't imagine that, say, Amazon relishes the idea of an Mac OS tablet PC that can do e-books better than the Kindle, the e-books being supplied by Google. Quite hard to see how folks sitting on the same boards could keep all that separate, but what do I know. A strict separation does sound a good idea even if only to ensure that folks stay well above suspicion.


They are barred from conflict of interest meetings.

However, I wouldn't blink an eye if Schmidt were told to resign.

Reply Score: 2

RE[2]: Comment by moleskine
by moleskine on Tue 5th May 2009 21:21 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by moleskine"
moleskine Member since:
2005-11-05

Good point, though I guess we might blink an eye if Schmidt were told to resign - and resigned from Google.

Reply Score: 3

Comment by kaiwai
by kaiwai on Tue 5th May 2009 22:34 UTC
kaiwai
Member since:
2005-07-06

Although I see the links between the two, I do think the accusations is a stretch of the imagination. The equivalence of their accusations would be me to claim that because there are directors on different software companies, they all refuse to support Linux, Conclusion: they are working with Microsoft to prop up their monopoly in the operating system business.

I support the need for oversight but at the same time I think that one needs to realise that there are 'investigations' that go on all the time based on complaints raised. This complaint may or may not even be valid - just like when an SEC does an investigation and find there is nothing untoward taken place in the financial reporting.

So I think people need to stand back, take a deep breath and realise that this is only an investigation - innocent till proven guilty.

Reply Score: 2

One clear evening in the mountains
by alcibiades on Wed 6th May 2009 07:34 UTC
alcibiades
Member since:
2005-10-12

On second thoughts, this comment is better not made.

Edited 2009-05-06 07:37 UTC

Reply Score: 1

Comment by chmeee
by chmeee on Wed 6th May 2009 18:18 UTC
chmeee
Member since:
2006-01-10

How can the government accuse these companies of potentially violating antitrust laws, when they themselves violated the antitrust acts of 1890 with the recent bailout crap? Seems too much of a double standard to be legal in any way.

Reply Score: 1