Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Tue 19th May 2009 04:19 UTC
Legal The two organizations haven't been what you'd call snuggle-buddies, but they're certainly adamant about certain aspects of software enough to agree and collectively petition a legal group for redress of a document. In a somewhat surprising move, Microsoft and the Linux Foundation have joined forces in writing and signing a letter to the American Law Institute asking for the group to hold off on submitting a document entitled "Principles of the Law of Software Contracts" for adjustments.
Order by: Score:
public domain?
by braddock on Tue 19th May 2009 05:19 UTC
braddock
Member since:
2005-07-08

Do the new guidelines address public domain as well? Can nothing be put into the Commons without liability?

Public domain has its own existential difficulties in Europe, of course.

Reply Score: 3

RE: public domain?
by obsidian on Tue 19th May 2009 07:47 UTC in reply to "public domain?"
obsidian Member since:
2007-05-12

Do the new guidelines address public domain as well? Can nothing be put into the Commons without liability?

Public domain has its own existential difficulties in Europe, of course.

Good point, Braddock.

I think it's very important to be able to keep the ability to be able to release software on an "as is"
basis. Lots of people are happy to use software released on that basis, and for those who aren't, there is always paid support by (say) Red Hat, Novell and so on.

Things can be sold on places like EBay and other such sites on an "as is" basis. Software should be no different.

Reply Score: 2

EU
by Lennie on Tue 19th May 2009 08:19 UTC
Lennie
Member since:
2007-09-22

There have been talks in the EU for warranties on software as well.

Reply Score: 1

Guidelines Approved Quickly
by dwmcqueen on Wed 20th May 2009 17:01 UTC
dwmcqueen
Member since:
2009-05-20

What is interesting is the draft guidelines were approved yesterday in record time. Not sure the letter had any impact.

Reply Score: 1