Linked by Kroc Camen on Thu 28th May 2009 17:32 UTC
Internet & Networking It appears that great minds think alike (or in the case of open-source software and the close-ties between Google and Mozilla, share-alike). Within a week of each other both Mozilla and Google have announced new initiatives to allow for extensions to their browsers to be written using regular HTML / JavaScript and CSS, greatly lowering the bar for developers to join in. Strap on your Mozilla Jetpack and take a peek at extensions for Chrome.
Order by: Score:
Question is:
by kragil on Thu 28th May 2009 18:47 UTC
kragil
Member since:
2006-01-04

Will Google host and update an adblock plus like extension that will block their ads? Or will we need a fork of the whole system for that. It will be interesting who that dilemma is resolved.

Reply Score: 2

RE: Question is:
by google_ninja on Thu 28th May 2009 18:59 UTC in reply to "Question is:"
google_ninja Member since:
2006-02-05

Where are you seeing that google will not allow extensions not authorized by them? Even if they don't host it, who cares?

Reply Score: 3

RE[2]: Question is:
by Kroc on Thu 28th May 2009 19:25 UTC in reply to "RE: Question is:"
Kroc Member since:
2005-11-10

It was a hypothetical question. Mozilla are not in the advertising business, allowing AdBlock Plus on their add-ons site is not a conflict of interest.

Reply Score: 2

RE: Question is:
by Liquidator on Thu 28th May 2009 21:18 UTC in reply to "Question is:"
Liquidator Member since:
2007-03-04

Who cares? There are lots of places on the web where you can download ad-blocking tools. Google won't make this mistake, as they know people will react badly and will rush to other web sites to get their ad blocker. The community might even be able to boycott Google Chrome if Google were to refuse ad-blocking extensions.

Reply Score: 2

Isn't Jetpack Greasemonkey?
by fz105 on Thu 28th May 2009 20:54 UTC
fz105
Member since:
2007-03-20

Isn't Jetpack just Greasemonkey?

What will happen to Greasemonkey? I think its kind of stupid for Mozilla to reinvent the wheel when something already exists.

I mean Greasemonkey might not be exactly Jetpack but isnt it achieving the kind of thing Jetpack is doing?

Confused....:)

Reply Score: 1

RE: Isn't Jetpack Greasemonkey?
by Kroc on Thu 28th May 2009 21:01 UTC in reply to "Isn't Jetpack Greasemonkey?"
Kroc Member since:
2005-11-10

Sorry no, GreaseMonkey allows you to modify website you’re viewing. Jetpack allows you to modify Firefox itself. You can write toolbars and status bar items and such using HTML.

Reply Score: 2

HTML?
by strcpy on Fri 29th May 2009 04:51 UTC
strcpy
Member since:
2009-05-20

WTF?

Since when has HTML been a programming language?

Reply Score: 1

RE: HTML?
by Kroc on Fri 29th May 2009 10:04 UTC in reply to "HTML?"
Kroc Member since:
2005-11-10

I didn’t say it was, I just said that you could write extensions using HTML ;) JavaScript is the programming language involved here.

Reply Score: 1

RE[2]: HTML?
by strcpy on Fri 29th May 2009 10:08 UTC in reply to "RE: HTML?"
strcpy Member since:
2009-05-20

No, no.

I wasn't aiming at you: I think it is Google and Mozilla who wants us to believe so.

Reply Score: 2

Comment by kaiwai
by kaiwai on Fri 29th May 2009 06:15 UTC
kaiwai
Member since:
2005-07-06

I had a look at the Google slideshow and quite honestly it is awesome; process isolation for each extension for example, using web technologies that'll allow a person to make one extension and for it to be usable on multiple browsers (hopefully Apple and Opera will come to the party on this one). I don't use many extensions but if it means that one less barrier can be taken down as to allow people to move between different browsers or use multiple browsers depending on the circumstances - Firefox on the desktop and Chrome on the Netbook (for example) then I welcome out new extension API overlords ;)

Reply Score: 3

deathshadow
Member since:
2005-07-12

But back in december on the Opera forums I suggested that they extend their widgets code - which is pretty much just HTML and javascript, to allow this same type of functionality so it could have something resembling extensions.

... and people scoffed at it as either impossible or undesirable.

Now FF and Chrome are going to have it.

Reply Score: 4

fonebone Member since:
2005-10-05

Of course! If Firefox or Google does it it's just wonderful. If IE or Opera does it it's just evil. </sarcasm>

Reply Score: 0