Post a Comment
If it's for a hobby, that's ok. I mean, if you use DesktopBSD at home, and if it's not maintained anymore, you can switch to FreeBSD, PC-BSD or even to Linux or other *BSD distro. They're all similar and sometimes compatible.
But since the very beginning when DesktopBSD was launched with PC-BSD being a strong competitor, I always felt discourage on the DesktopBSD forum somehow. I'm amazed it has survived that long, truely. Who's next? 
That's what so great about projects based on Open Source components, you're almost never relying on just one vendor. I haven't looked into it, but I doubt migrating from DesktopBSD to some other FreeBSD based distro is all that hard. Certainly easier than migrating to a completely different OS.
Same with Linux, if your favorite one man distro goes under you can often trivially move to another distro with minimal effort. And it's even easier if your favourite one man distro is based on a larger distro like Debian or Fedora.
So while there are certainly wisdom in your statement it seems somewhat overstated. The important thing is to keep a migration path open. If you do that then use the software that works best for you no matter how small it might be.
For the moment.
I recall that a while back Patrick was doctor shopping, ignoring their advice, and posting to Slashdot or some such for medical advice regarding a serious long-term illness he had or thought he had, possibly involving an electric toothbrush.
Edited 2009-06-09 03:24 UTC
I figured this was coming last week when I was reading the message boards. It's a shame, but I can't really see the need anymore when we have PC-BSD essentially doing the same thing. With NetBSD going the Gnome route, perhaps the next user-friendly BSD should cater to XFCE users?




