Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 10th Jun 2009 09:46 UTC, submitted by RJop
Linux Linus Torvalds has announced the release of version 2.6.30 of the Linux kernel. "I'm sure we've missed something, and I know we have some regressions pending. At the same time, we do need the coverage of a eral release, and on the whole it looks pretty good. We've fixed a few regressions in the last few days, and there's always 2.6.30.x." The list of changes is interesting.
Order by: Score:

They sure did miss something...
by Morph on Wed 10th Jun 2009 10:00 UTC
Morph
Member since:
2007-08-20

proofreading the announcement, for one ;)

RE: They sure did miss something...
by kragil on Wed 10th Jun 2009 10:17 UTC in reply to "They sure did miss something..."
kragil Member since:
2006-01-04

It is a kernel regression. The kernel isn't fast enough to keep up with Linus' typing speed.

kernel regression
by Andre4s on Wed 10th Jun 2009 10:59 UTC
Andre4s
Member since:
2006-02-10

What does kernel regression mean?

RE: kernel regression
by WereCatf on Wed 10th Jun 2009 11:02 UTC in reply to "kernel regression"
WereCatf Member since:
2006-02-15

It means that a feature that worked in the last release will exhibit buggy or completely broken behaviour now.

RE: kernel regression
by _xmv on Wed 10th Jun 2009 12:11 UTC in reply to "kernel regression"
_xmv Member since:
2008-12-09

What does kernel regression mean?

its a nice way to say "bug"


(yes yes, its a specific kind of bug: feature that worked before stopped working, effectively "regressing")

RE[2]: kernel regression
by meeh on Wed 10th Jun 2009 13:22 UTC in reply to "RE: kernel regression"
meeh Member since:
2009-01-19

"bug" is too ambigious, regression is when functionality gets worse.

I belive in this case the topic is performance regression, which means that while new features was added or other modules/features got optimised one or more existing features got slower , eg uses more cpu cycles to achieve the same work.

Common regressions happens while eg. choosing to optimise towards either latency or throughput, you rarely get to satisfy all users in such a case, which could explain why just about every important module is hot-plugable in the Linux kernel (eg. schedulers optimized for servers vs desktops).

Intel GEM
by Isolationist on Wed 10th Jun 2009 11:09 UTC
Isolationist
Member since:
2006-05-28

I really hope that Intel's GEM is stable and giving out good performance.

RE: Intel GEM
by big_gie on Wed 10th Jun 2009 13:31 UTC in reply to "Intel GEM"
big_gie Member since:
2006-01-04

It is, at least on 3 of my machines ;)

RE[2]: Intel GEM
by Isolationist on Wed 10th Jun 2009 19:06 UTC in reply to "RE: Intel GEM"
Isolationist Member since:
2006-05-28

It is, at least on 3 of my machines ;)


With version 2.6.30?

RE[3]: Intel GEM
by big_gie on Wed 10th Jun 2009 19:10 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Intel GEM"
big_gie Member since:
2006-01-04

Not even... I'm using .29.4, xf86-video-intel 2.7.1, xorg-server 1.6.1.901 and KMS+UXA+DRI2 on my netbook (eeepc 1000), a Dell Workstation and a Dell latitude D830 without issues.

This is since a month or two. Before that I often had crashes and freeze. I don't see those now, I'm happy ;)

RE[3]: Intel GEM
by Damnshock on Sun 14th Jun 2009 07:45 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Intel GEM"
Damnshock Member since:
2006-09-15

It is not stable on my machine (toshiba U200 Intel GM945) ;)

It is stable without KMS though.

Personally..
by fithisux on Wed 10th Jun 2009 16:00 UTC
fithisux
Member since:
2006-01-22

I would like to see more things pushed to the user-space (ala uKernel). Anyway I believe they did their best again with this release.

RE: Personally..
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Wed 10th Jun 2009 19:50 UTC in reply to "Personally.."
Bill Shooter of Bul Member since:
2006-07-14

Well, you're in luck. You can personally change it. As linus likes to say, His tree of the kernel is his tree. If you disagree, create your own tree. All the major distros have their own trees that vary from Linus' tree.

I know that would be a time consuming proposition for little real gain, but sometimes I think we have it too good in our vast world of open source software.

Feel free to express your desires, we need to hear all voices so that the majority of them can be served by the default behavior. Your particular request, most likely wouldn't be best for most users so its unlikely to be adopted in a major tree.

Edit: my grammar filter is broken again. Sorry.

Edited 2009-06-10 19:51 UTC

Latest stable version
by Isolationist on Wed 10th Jun 2009 19:10 UTC
Isolationist
Member since:
2006-05-28

Has 2.6.30 been released or are they preparing to release it ... reason I ask is that at the time of writing, on kernel.org it shows the latest stable version of the Linux kernel as 2.6.29.4.

Update: looks like the website is lagging behind.

Edited 2009-06-10 19:24 UTC

multitouch
by boulabiar on Thu 11th Jun 2009 07:00 UTC
boulabiar
Member since:
2009-04-18

Hi,
Why they don't mention the new multitouch support ?
http://www.lii-enac.fr/en/projects/shareit/linux.html

Comment by diego
by diego on Thu 11th Jun 2009 13:52 UTC
diego
Member since:
2006-08-15

Great release, the NILFS2 file system looks really great and interesting, I can't wait for Btrfs to be stable though ;) .