Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Tue 1st Sep 2009 18:29 UTC, submitted by James
Post a Comment
RE[2]: Oh that's it....
by AmigaRobbo on Tue 1st Sep 2009 20:00 UTC
in reply to "RE: Oh that's it...."
Cortex-A8 processor, 3D graphics hardware, 512M RAM, wifi
Sounds like the upcoming Nokia N900 hardware.
Sounds like the upcoming Nokia N900 hardware.
Saying a device with Cortex-A8 processor, 3D graphics hardware, 512M RAM, wifi, is like saying a car with an internal combustion engine, wheels and windows.
Cortex-A8 is licensed by a lot of companies.
Edit: There are more ARM hardware implementations than Intel's x84. Very little of those can be called "the same hardware"
Edited 2009-09-01 20:23 UTC
RE: startup time and battery life
by memson on Wed 2nd Sep 2009 10:59 UTC
in reply to "startup time and battery life"
power on to desktop - 1 second.. not far from the RiscOS Archimedes computers where the OS was in ROM.
No. Wrong. The A7000 (Last Acorn machine I used, RISCOS 3.6) takes about 40 - 50 seconds to boot. Whilst the *basic* OS is in ROM, it loads much of the rest of the OS from Hard disc. Even the A3000, which was entirely ROM based and ran RISCOS 2.0 still took around 10 seconds.
RE[2]: startup time and battery life
by timl on Wed 2nd Sep 2009 11:30 UTC
in reply to "RE: startup time and battery life"
Hmmm. Some 10 years ago I knew someone with a RiscPC, not quite sure of the model but I think it had a StrongARM CPU. As I remember it, the thing would indeed boot in a few seconds. I must admit that I never worked closely enough with the machine to remember if it would continue to load stuff in the background (like Windows does since XP). But I am quite sure it was *usable* after only a second of 3 to 5.
Another thing I clearly remember is that the owner would often just reboot instead of closing all his open applications. It was faster and less hassle than closing all apps manually 
"RISC OS is really popular in the UK"
True in 1989 (by virtue of Acorn's privileged status in education), much less true in 1999 (by virtue of Acorn's demise), hardly true at all in 2009.
True in 1989 (by virtue of Acorn's privileged status in education), much less true in 1999 (by virtue of Acorn's demise), hardly true at all in 2009.
Agreed. You'd be hard pressed to find more than a handful of Acorn users in any city. They are thin on the ground and mostly using second user systems that schools threw out or overly expensive (now discontinued) Iyonix.



