Post a Comment
I'm a little skeptical about the OO claim, although it would be cool. I suspect it's selection bias. In other words, the sorts of people who would be interested in participating in a survey like this would tend to be the sort who would use OO, but I happily admit I could be wrong.
I would also be skeptical about the OO claim for business, as from my experience they almost always run MS Office because they really have to.
If a client sends a file that OO can't handle, you can't do the whole FSF 'please resend in a neutral file format' thing because $$$ is at stake. It just doesn't look professional to them.
alot of my customers have switched to open office, gimp and firefox lately. im really happy that my clients are embracing open standards - even though they dont know about them. i usually tell them, hey its $XXX for microsoft office and free for open office. and the kicker is open office will do excel, power point and word, what is there to lose?
they simply love it.
Dr. D
How are these stats collected? Based on a process running on the hosts, or based on asking people questions?
The former is likely to favour microsoft (especially since it counts browser and media player share, when the ms apps are always installed even if users don't use any such apps) while the latter might favour others (more technical users are likely to understand and complete the questions)



