Post a Comment
...I know of at least on site in JBerg, South Africa (not far from District 9) that is pretty fast. For our work the other day I had to remote (from Australia) onto one of our clients machines to check a few things using teamviewer. The response time was pretty good. I was able to do what I had to on the desktop without too much hassle.
I also have to send zipped up software to them from time to time using MSN, all without any dramas. The files I sent weren't 4Gb worth, but would certainly be closer to 4% of that and would take seconds, not hours...
Perhaps the infrastructure in some areas there is still poor, which again is hardly the fault of the ISP.
Here's hoping they get faster soon...
I still love the idea of a carrier pigeon winning though :-)
Though this story is funny, such "crude reality" hits me all the time.
I am downloading PCBSD installer dvd image and it will finish in two days!
I have a 128kbps broadband Internet connection and pay approximately 25 american dollars per such service.... All ISP here have similar rates and speeds....
Be happy of having such incredibly fast connections at such cheap prices!
Edited 2009-09-11 01:41 UTC
Where are you located?
We have a municipal (as in, community funded) broadband connection here where we live, in suburban Seattle. It connects right in to the Seattle Internet Exchange. We get fiber to the home. I am paying about $50 for 20 Mbit down / 10 MBit up.
(A reasonably popular torrent - like Slackware say - will come down at a rate of 1 GB every 10-12 minutes.)
Anyway, I have to say it's really an impressive example of what can be accomplished when the services to the community take priority over profit. I think more communities need to take the initiative to improve their internet connectivity where ISP's fail.
There is a community near ours here that is doing something similar. The federal government is actually funding part of the effort through some bailout money (or maybe it's part of some other initiative or both).
Perhaps you can get other people involved in your community and get the US government to help out.
Two hours to upload a 4-GB chunk? That's god damn fast. With my current 8 Mbps connection it would take like 1,5 hours to download that piece, and 10 hours to upload it (1,0 Mbps upstream).
Whining /off.
E: dunno but it looks like the transfer was at 4 % after two hours or something. Missed a line and the story is misleading.
Edited 2009-09-11 04:29 UTC
2 minuts that is 33MB/s or 266mbit and even if usb 2.0 is speced out at 480mbit i dont truly think it will hit that speed. i have a hard time finding a stick that will handle 25MB/s (well not if you read the manafactures spec)
3 or 4 minuts sounds more reasonable =)
Edited 2009-09-12 01:41 UTC
Snails have been proven to be even faster
http://www.notes.co.il/benbasat/10991.asp
Can't help myself:
1. You're missing a zero.
2. And the round-time ping is twice that, as it took the pigeon two hours just to get there.
Nonetheless, your point is well-taken -- this is more a publicity stunt than particularly relevant to how most people use broadband (e.g., web browsing).
Can't help myself:
1. You're missing a zero. "
So I am. I feel like a bit of a tool.
The OSnews summary says the pigeon took an hour to reach the destination, and a (hotly-disputed) hour to transfer the data off the USB stick. If you were looking at a round-time ping, then it would be two hours for travelling and a couple of seconds to mount the drive and read/write a couple of bytes.
Exactly!
This is the first thing they teach on our data communication classes at University of Helsinki. You can get insane bandwidth by moving disks on a truck.
Then the story continues on the peer-to-peer course by explaining that moving disks by walking is a peer-to-peer network with rather good bandwidth.
Online peer-to-peer file-sharing systems are then built to solve the problem of figuring out who has what. They also make moving content around cheaper, as you don't have to be walking around moving disks.





