Post a Comment
Exactly. There is absolutely no harm in Ubuntu doing this.
And for those preaching "the cloud is a fad" need to think back in history when instant messaging was a also a fad that would "never catch on in the business world". It will evolve over time, but it is here to stay, especially as it gets harder to differentiate between local networks and the Internet.
Also consider that more and more people these days are perfectly fine with putting their personal information online. Consider technology like social networking and SAAS apps (Google Apps for instance). Again, the cloud is not going away.
I'm not preaching the cloud is a fad, as it has already been used for years. Instant messaging at work though will normally get a person fired, so it still has not caught on in the business world.
Yeah. When first tier puts me on hold and then comes back with a completely nonsensical answer to my problem, I always wonder what bizarre chain of typographical errors might have resulted in it. Can these companies not afford phones and extension numbers?
No, not a rare thing. If it's secured, and it's logged, a lot of places use it.
Companies generally don't use free services most likely, but Microsoft has had corporate IM solutions for years, first in Exchange 2000 and now in Live Communications Server. There's OpenFire which is XMPP-based, SSL secured, and logs everything said.
Are you kidding? You can't compare Cloud Computing with messaging technologies. That's a whole different story, goals, and so on. CC takes your data into the cloud so you loose a touch with it - completely. Your data is no longer yours - it physicaly belongs to company X, Y or Z. And what about backups?
Urhh, whatever. Just go and read through the whole thing, not only the positives of CC. There's always the second side of the coin.
Cloud Computing (taken from Wikipedia) is "a computing capability that provides an abstraction between the computing resource and its underlying technical architecture (e.g., servers, storage, networks), enabling convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction."
Cloud computing is what people have already been doing for years, just without the web-based stuff. It is a client server model by definition, where the client uses resources stored on a server, whether it is an application or files. This used to be the norm back with the mainframe and dumb terminal days, and continues with all kinds of application servers designed to do just that. They have been in use for years. There is certainly nothing new about the idea, nor is it revolutionary. It is just the latest IT buzz word to throw around at the water cooler.
The business model around "the cloud" also makes it somewhat different than the pre-cloud days. Usually, like with all of Amazon's services for example, you have "unlimited" usage and storage capability, but you only pay for what you use. This is similar to how Compuserve and some of the old BBS systems worked (pay by the hour).
Same kinds of services, different business model.
Whoa, buzzword police.
There's no such thing as a private cloud. While the term is pretty ambiguous, minimally, storing something in "the cloud" refers to storing it with some third party, passing off the burden of storage to someone else. If the term is diluted to the point that one can also create their own "private" cloud, it then refers to nothing more than storing something remotely. We already have a word for that: a server.




