Linked by David Adams on Tue 20th Oct 2009 18:32 UTC
Post a Comment
RE: including a pretty serious CHKDSK bug?
by drstorm on Wed 21st Oct 2009 00:26 UTC
in reply to "including a pretty serious CHKDSK bug?"
RE[2]: including a pretty serious CHKDSK bug?
by Karitku on Thu 22nd Oct 2009 08:34 UTC
in reply to "RE: including a pretty serious CHKDSK bug?"
It is, in fact, not a bug at all. The great memory usage is by design. This article should be corrected ASAP.
Indeed. Bug was in Intel(if I remember correct) drivers that caused BSOD during chkdsk. High memory consuming was new design in chkdsk in order to decrease time that it takes. I feel sad that Osnews editors knowledge of technical details is level of Engadget editor.
RE: One would have to be utterly crazy
by strcpy on Thu 22nd Oct 2009 10:04 UTC
in reply to "One would have to be utterly crazy"
RE[2]: One would have to be utterly crazy
by lemur2 on Thu 22nd Oct 2009 11:37 UTC
in reply to "RE: One would have to be utterly crazy"
Do you have to pollute every article related to Microsoft with this bulk Linux advocacy? It is annoying.
OK, sorry. I react very badly to commercial companies trying to rip people off. When it is as blatant a rip-off as Windows 7 in my country, I had to say something somewhere.
I get so angry.



