Post a Comment
1) CISCO introduces security technology to forever block open source protocols and systems from ever connecting to the future internet.
2) CISCO pays off homeland security to make legislation that only allows certain configurations of hardware and software to connect to the internet, which also by the way must be licensed by the FCC.
3) They introduce a new proprietary protocol, patented that is only available to select businesses that can afford to buy it, which by the way is required if you want to hook up to internet 2.
-Hack
PS: CISCO SUCKS ARSE
LOL
Now why would Cisco hurt itself by doing that? They *use* nothing but open protocols and such...
CISCO ARE ARSELOCKERS, they will eventually lock your arse down! we will all end up with locked-down arses!
Now, seriously: your scenario sounds bit paranoid to me.
This won't probobly ever happen. Why? because we have many environments, which cannot be tight by some business model in ANY way, i.e academics, opensource, healthcare, military sector. They just can't afford an IT dependance and they will never agree to such form of trade.
I can just imagine. LOL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAUyaELfwBo
skyNet is already online and currently being extended:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8556585.stm
:P
This is likely what is going to "forever change the internet:"
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9168058/Cisco_unveils_next_I...
"The Cisco CRS-3 triples the capacity of its predecessor, the Cisco CRS-1 Carrier Routing System, with up to 322 Terabits per second, which enables the entire printed collection of the Library of Congress to be downloaded in just over one second;"
Printed? Sounds painful.
"every man, woman and child in China to make a video call, simultaneously;"
As opposed to being surveiled?
"and every motion picture ever created to be streamed in less than four minutes."
Every motion picture? Even the ones I made in by basement?
The real question is, "can we all hold hands while using it?"
"and every motion picture ever created to be streamed in less than four minutes."
Over my 256 DSL line? Fat f'n chance.
That seems like setting the bar pretty low for "changing the internet forever". It's great, but it's incremental. It's like saying AMDs 5890 is going to change gaming forever because it's faster than previous cards. Scaling something up without making fundamental changes is not what I would call "changing something forever". I mean their "forever" will only last until they make an even faster CRS





