Linked by snydeq on Wed 14th Jul 2010 19:40 UTC
Java InfoWorld's Andrew Binstock takes an in-depth look at scripting language performance on the JVM. While Java has become more complex, the JVM has become one of the fastest and most efficient execution platforms available, creating an opening for a new generation of languages that lack Java's syntax overload to take advantage of the JVM. The report examines Groovy, JRuby, Scala, Fanthom, and Jython. Of the five, Groovy and JRuby have risen from the niche, a trend that will also likely benefit Scala and Fanthom as well. Jython's moment in the sun, Binstock writes, has probably come and gone.
Order by: Score:
Scala?
by sigzero on Thu 15th Jul 2010 01:41 UTC
sigzero
Member since:
2006-01-03

Scala is NOT a scripting language!

Reply Score: 2

RE: Scala?
by DataPath on Thu 15th Jul 2010 01:48 UTC in reply to "Scala?"
DataPath Member since:
2005-06-29

Did you see his definition of "scripting language"?

"Technologists differ on what exactly is a scripting language[...] I used a broader definition, which is any JVM language that is simpler to code in than Java."

Brilliant.

Reply Score: 1

RE[2]: Scala?
by sigzero on Thu 15th Jul 2010 02:17 UTC in reply to "RE: Scala?"
sigzero Member since:
2006-01-03

LOL...I missed that. He is, um, not smart.

Reply Score: 1

Clojure?
by lawina on Thu 15th Jul 2010 05:55 UTC
lawina
Member since:
2006-01-20

Unfortunate he dismissed Clojure with few comments.

Reply Score: 1

Too weak...
by karijes on Thu 15th Jul 2010 08:29 UTC
karijes
Member since:
2009-04-22

This review looks like was done by someone who is regular Java developer (or even casual) and (from time to time) read online about other JVM languages.

No talk about interoperability with Java, no talk about speed and no talk about each language unique features (I know this is a big topic, but smart writer would handle it).

And only few words about Clojure?

Edited 2010-07-15 08:35 UTC

Reply Score: 1

It's Fantom
by bogomipz on Thu 15th Jul 2010 15:26 UTC
bogomipz
Member since:
2005-07-11

... not Fanthom. The article gets it right, but OSnews decided to introduce an extra letter in the name.

I thought I'd mention it because it's easier to google for something when you spell it correctly. Especially when the wrong spelling is a word in english dictionaries.

Reply Score: 2