Linked by fran on Mon 27th Dec 2010 21:32 UTC
Legal "Hopewell Culture & Design reckons it owns the act of double-clicking, and is suing Apple, Nokia, Samsung and just about everyone else for breaching its patent. It's not double-clicking per se that US patent 7,171,625 covers, just the act of clicking twice on an already-selected component to action a request for additional information or greater interactivity."
Order by: Score:
...
by Thom_Holwerda on Mon 27th Dec 2010 21:37 UTC
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

Patenting an act?

I'm going to patent the act of moving your hand up and down the penis at an increasingly rapid pace. I'm going to be rich!

Reply Score: 10

RE: ...
by fretinator on Mon 27th Dec 2010 21:55 UTC in reply to "..."
fretinator Member since:
2005-07-06

Prior art rebuttals should be interesting.

Reply Score: 5

RE[2]: ...
by flanque on Tue 28th Dec 2010 01:57 UTC in reply to "RE: ..."
flanque Member since:
2005-12-15

rebuttals

Depending on your take of things.

Reply Score: 2

RE: ...
by Valhalla on Mon 27th Dec 2010 21:57 UTC in reply to "..."
Valhalla Member since:
2006-01-24

Patenting an act?

I'm going to patent the act of moving your hand up and down the penis at an increasingly rapid pace. I'm going to be rich!

Unless you get sued to oblivion by people claiming they've gone blind and/or gotten hairy palms from using your patented method ;)

Seriously though, how can they expect this to be held up in court? Yes, I know we are talking about the US in which 'patents' like these are actually granted but still...

Reply Score: 5

RE[2]: ...
by Doc Pain on Mon 27th Dec 2010 22:17 UTC in reply to "RE: ..."
Doc Pain Member since:
2006-10-08

Seriously though, how can they expect this to be held up in court? Yes, I know we are talking about the US in which 'patents' like these are actually granted but still...


I assume one point of a possible discussion could be the following, as mentioned in the article: "It's not double-clicking per se that US patent 7,171,625 covers, just the act of clicking twice on an already-selected component to action a request for additional information or greater interactivity." Already-selected. In order to avoid "patent problems", a party could respond that the act of double-clicking does happen on an object that is not selected.

In many GUI settings, the first click of the double-click action does the selection part. A previous click is not needed ("triple-click"). Before the double-click action takes place, the respective element is not selected.

A different approach can be seen in other GUI settings. Here, moving the mouse pointer toward an interactive element already selects that element (like the "modern" concept of selection following the mouse pointer in menus or icon bars, where it is not needed to hold down a mouse button).

Funny, maybe interesting, but basically futile, I think.

Reply Score: 3

RE[3]: ...
by sorpigal on Tue 28th Dec 2010 11:41 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: ..."
sorpigal Member since:
2005-11-02

And yet even though selecting first isn't *required* it is still permitted. In most desktop UIs I can click an icon, then double-click it.

The innovation here really seems to be "Double-clicking a selected element in a web browser." Because, you know, it's clearly not obvious that things which can be done could also be done in a web browser or on the internet[/i]. To one skilled in the art these concepts would be revolutionary!

Reply Score: 3

RE: ...
by drstorm on Mon 27th Dec 2010 23:33 UTC in reply to "..."
drstorm Member since:
2009-04-24

I'm going to patent the act of moving your hand up and down the penis at an increasingly rapid pace. I'm going to be rich!

Linux-minded folks would just keep the pace constant to avoid the law suit. ;)

Reply Score: 3

RE[2]: ...
by flanque on Tue 28th Dec 2010 01:58 UTC in reply to "RE: ..."
flanque Member since:
2005-12-15

This would be the new fair scheduler.

Reply Score: 4

Comment by Stratoukos
by Stratoukos on Mon 27th Dec 2010 22:33 UTC
Stratoukos
Member since:
2009-02-11

I am just trying to imagine the workflow of the guy who approved this patent.

He double-clicked on the 'patents' folder on his desktop, he then double-clicked on '7171625.doc', he read the application and he then proceeded to shit his pants from the awesomeness of this previously unheard technological innovation.

Reply Score: 17

Comment by yoshi314@gmail.com
by yoshi314@gmail.com on Tue 28th Dec 2010 07:08 UTC
yoshi314@gmail.com
Member since:
2009-12-14

if that doesn't serve as a cold shower to all software patent endorses, i don't know what will.

Reply Score: 2