Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Tue 24th May 2011 14:11 UTC, submitted by vermaden
Post a Comment
RE: Performance benefit?
by Neolander on Tue 24th May 2011 16:49 UTC
in reply to "Performance benefit?"
Probably not, since the GNU toolchain has seen lots of work while this has been solely developed in the basement of one single company so far. But it could become faster in the future, with backup from the *BSD community, considering what has happened to LLVM/Clang.
Edited 2011-05-24 16:56 UTC
RE[2]: Performance benefit?
by pfgbsd on Wed 25th May 2011 00:29 UTC
in reply to "RE: Performance benefit?"
Probably not, since the GNU toolchain has seen lots of work while this has been solely developed in the basement of one single company so far.
Actually I would think a small focused team can achieve better results than the heterogeneous group that usually makes up the gcc contributors group. There's also the benefit of a modern redesign and that they could use the GNU stuff as a reference for ideas and testing.
It's certainly good to have alternatives to the GNU stuff. This package will probably play very with Apple's libc++.
Unfortunately there are not many benchmarks for this type of stuff.



