Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 20th Sep 2011 21:56 UTC
Hardware, Embedded Systems "Nvidia has released a few technical details of its upcoming 'Kal-El' Tegra processor, including a secret it's done well to keep under its hat thus far: it's a five-core, not four-core, chip." This fifth core is low-power, and can be used for remedial tasks. Clever, although, as the article notes, not new.
Order by: Score:
by Tuxie on Tue 20th Sep 2011 22:21 UTC
Member since:

How quint...

Reply Score: 4

More cores =)
by viton on Tue 20th Sep 2011 23:24 UTC
Member since:

I wonder how many "hidden" cores they have =)
Tegra2 contains 3 ARM cores(2xA9 + ARM7).
Dual core OMAP5 has 4 cores (2xA15 and 2xM4)

Reply Score: 2

RE: More cores =)
by zima on Wed 21st Sep 2011 00:16 UTC in reply to "More cores =)"
zima Member since:

It is probably a bit hilarious with "smartphone Atom" from Intel. When the first version was announced, I saw a block diagram of it - showing:

a) some fairly standard radio module from a manufacturer specialising in this, most likely with the radio stack running on an ARM core.

b) a part mysteriously labelled ~"32bit RISC" in the "southbridge" of sorts, most likely coordinating the whole thing. ~"32 bit RISC" could mean just a fairly standard ARM core (why Intel would bother with anything else?)

So it's possible that this whole "push x86 everywhere" Intel contraption actually has more ARM cores than x86 ones ;) (which is possibly also the case even with an average PC - drive controllers, DSL "modem", monitor menu, ...)
Not central processing units per se... but still, would be a bit hilarious.

Edited 2011-09-21 00:30 UTC

Reply Score: 3

RE[2]: More cores =)
by tylerdurden on Wed 21st Sep 2011 22:08 UTC in reply to "RE: More cores =)"
tylerdurden Member since:

That extrapolation is hilarious indeed... given you had no data whatsoever on the details of that atom design.

Edited 2011-09-21 22:09 UTC

Reply Score: 2

RE[3]: More cores =)
by zima on Tue 27th Sep 2011 23:55 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: More cores =)"
zima Member since:

probably ... most likely ... mysteriously ... ~ ... could mean ... possible ... would be
(some emphasis added)

Hm, my apologies, that was way too few hints - luckily, you were here, able to figure out on your own how it's not exactly a certain info...

(but also not far-fetched, not quite "no data whatsoever"; with stacks of radio modules typically running on some ARM - Intel outright buying out Infineon team providing also their radio chipsets wouldn't change that - strongly hinting to at least equal number of x86 and ARM cores ...also, ~"32bit RISC" label was curiously vague, on an Intel presentation slide)

Reply Score: 2

Screw tablets
by chmeee on Wed 21st Sep 2011 13:51 UTC
Member since:

Screw tablets, I want this in my next laptop.

Reply Score: 2

RE: Screw tablets
by bnolsen on Wed 21st Sep 2011 21:22 UTC in reply to "Screw tablets"
bnolsen Member since:

I doubt that. It seems nvidia isn't doing very well in competing with other arm based manufacturers.

Their 3d is worse than what's currently available. Not sure about their raw cpu. At least this one has neon (I think).

Reply Score: 2

RE[2]: Screw tablets
by Luminair on Wed 21st Sep 2011 21:49 UTC in reply to "RE: Screw tablets"
Luminair Member since:

there is so much wrong with what you said. you need to study this.

Reply Score: 2

RE[2]: Screw tablets
by Carewolf on Thu 22nd Sep 2011 09:39 UTC in reply to "RE: Screw tablets"
Carewolf Member since:

No, but AMD could put a Nano-core their next desktop CPU, or Intel could put an Atom-core in their next desktop CPU. The hard part is OS support, but hardware-wise it is pretty simple.

Current desktop CPUs idle at 10-20W, the netbook CPUs uses 1-2W at full speed.

Reply Score: 2